{"title":"限时饮食和六餐饮食的比较:对身体成分和生化参数的影响。","authors":"Merve Yüzbaşıoğlu, Aclan Özder","doi":"10.6133/apjcn.202508_34(4).0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Obesity and obesity-related diseases is increasing worldwide. The widely accepted approach in the dietary treatment of obesity is the calorie-restricted six meal diet; however, alternative approaches are needed. This study aimed to compare time-restricted eating (TRE), a method that can be easily conveyed and applied in overcoming obesity, to six meals diet.</p><p><strong>Methods and study design: </strong>A total of 174 participants aged 18-65, BMI>25 kg/m2 were included, with 88 participants in the time-restricted eating group and 86 participants in the six-meal group. Diet lists with similar calorie, macro counts suitable for their respective groups were prepared. Anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, blood tests were analyzed before the study and at the end of the 8-week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More weight loss [MD: 1.17 kg, (95% CI: 0.23-2.06), Cohen's d=0.42], higher decrease in BMI [MD: 0.41 kg/m2 (95% CI: -0.77 to -0.06), Cohen's d=0.39] , decrease in waist-to-hip ratio [MD: 0.008 (95% CI: -0.016-0.000), Cohen's d=0.35], decrease in obesity degree [MD: 2.35 (95% CI: -3.99 to -0.70), Cohen's d=0.50] were observed in the time-restricted eating group (p<0.05). In the six meals group, decrease in LDL values was higher compared to the time-restricted eating group [p<0.05, MD:0.23 mmol/L (95% Cl:0.41-15.79), Cohen's d=0.36]. More participants preferred to continue TRE (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TRE resulted in greater weight loss, body fat reduction, and improved metabolic parameters, proving more effective for weight management. The six-meal diet was superior for LDL reduction. Both approaches yielded positive outcomes, with TRE emerging as an alternative weight loss strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8486,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","volume":"34 4","pages":"589-595"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12310433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of time-restricted eating and a six-meal diet: Effects on body composition and biochemical parameters.\",\"authors\":\"Merve Yüzbaşıoğlu, Aclan Özder\",\"doi\":\"10.6133/apjcn.202508_34(4).0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Obesity and obesity-related diseases is increasing worldwide. The widely accepted approach in the dietary treatment of obesity is the calorie-restricted six meal diet; however, alternative approaches are needed. This study aimed to compare time-restricted eating (TRE), a method that can be easily conveyed and applied in overcoming obesity, to six meals diet.</p><p><strong>Methods and study design: </strong>A total of 174 participants aged 18-65, BMI>25 kg/m2 were included, with 88 participants in the time-restricted eating group and 86 participants in the six-meal group. Diet lists with similar calorie, macro counts suitable for their respective groups were prepared. Anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, blood tests were analyzed before the study and at the end of the 8-week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More weight loss [MD: 1.17 kg, (95% CI: 0.23-2.06), Cohen's d=0.42], higher decrease in BMI [MD: 0.41 kg/m2 (95% CI: -0.77 to -0.06), Cohen's d=0.39] , decrease in waist-to-hip ratio [MD: 0.008 (95% CI: -0.016-0.000), Cohen's d=0.35], decrease in obesity degree [MD: 2.35 (95% CI: -3.99 to -0.70), Cohen's d=0.50] were observed in the time-restricted eating group (p<0.05). In the six meals group, decrease in LDL values was higher compared to the time-restricted eating group [p<0.05, MD:0.23 mmol/L (95% Cl:0.41-15.79), Cohen's d=0.36]. More participants preferred to continue TRE (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TRE resulted in greater weight loss, body fat reduction, and improved metabolic parameters, proving more effective for weight management. The six-meal diet was superior for LDL reduction. Both approaches yielded positive outcomes, with TRE emerging as an alternative weight loss strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"589-595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12310433/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202508_34(4).0010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202508_34(4).0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of time-restricted eating and a six-meal diet: Effects on body composition and biochemical parameters.
Background and objectives: Obesity and obesity-related diseases is increasing worldwide. The widely accepted approach in the dietary treatment of obesity is the calorie-restricted six meal diet; however, alternative approaches are needed. This study aimed to compare time-restricted eating (TRE), a method that can be easily conveyed and applied in overcoming obesity, to six meals diet.
Methods and study design: A total of 174 participants aged 18-65, BMI>25 kg/m2 were included, with 88 participants in the time-restricted eating group and 86 participants in the six-meal group. Diet lists with similar calorie, macro counts suitable for their respective groups were prepared. Anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, blood tests were analyzed before the study and at the end of the 8-week.
Results: More weight loss [MD: 1.17 kg, (95% CI: 0.23-2.06), Cohen's d=0.42], higher decrease in BMI [MD: 0.41 kg/m2 (95% CI: -0.77 to -0.06), Cohen's d=0.39] , decrease in waist-to-hip ratio [MD: 0.008 (95% CI: -0.016-0.000), Cohen's d=0.35], decrease in obesity degree [MD: 2.35 (95% CI: -3.99 to -0.70), Cohen's d=0.50] were observed in the time-restricted eating group (p<0.05). In the six meals group, decrease in LDL values was higher compared to the time-restricted eating group [p<0.05, MD:0.23 mmol/L (95% Cl:0.41-15.79), Cohen's d=0.36]. More participants preferred to continue TRE (p<0.001).
Conclusions: TRE resulted in greater weight loss, body fat reduction, and improved metabolic parameters, proving more effective for weight management. The six-meal diet was superior for LDL reduction. Both approaches yielded positive outcomes, with TRE emerging as an alternative weight loss strategy.
期刊介绍:
The aims of the Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition
(APJCN) are to publish high quality clinical nutrition relevant research findings which can build the capacity of
clinical nutritionists in the region and enhance the practice of human nutrition and related disciplines for health
promotion and disease prevention. APJCN will publish
original research reports, reviews, short communications
and case reports. News, book reviews and other items will
also be included. The acceptance criteria for all papers are
the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated,
manuscripts are peer-reviewed by at least two anonymous
reviewers and the Editor. The Editorial Board reserves the
right to refuse any material for publication and advises
that authors should retain copies of submitted manuscripts
and correspondence as material cannot be returned. Final
acceptance or rejection rests with the Editorial Board