Mohamed J Saadh, Qusay Mohammed Hussain, Rafid Jihad Albadr, Hardik Doshi, M M Rekha, Mayank Kundlas, Amrita Pal, Jasur Rizaev, Waam Mohammed Taher, Mariem Alwan, Mahmod Jasem Jawad, Ali M Ali Al-Nuaimi, Bagher Farhood
{"title":"放射组学与变形:乳腺癌乳房x光检查中肿瘤分割和分类的新方法。","authors":"Mohamed J Saadh, Qusay Mohammed Hussain, Rafid Jihad Albadr, Hardik Doshi, M M Rekha, Mayank Kundlas, Amrita Pal, Jasur Rizaev, Waam Mohammed Taher, Mariem Alwan, Mahmod Jasem Jawad, Ali M Ali Al-Nuaimi, Bagher Farhood","doi":"10.1177/08953996251351624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop a robust framework for breast cancer diagnosis by integrating advanced segmentation and classification approaches. Transformer-based and U-Net segmentation models were combined with radiomic feature extraction and machine learning classifiers to improve segmentation precision and classification accuracy in mammographic images.Materials and MethodsA multi-center dataset of 8000 mammograms (4200 normal, 3800 abnormal) was used. Segmentation was performed using Transformer-based and U-Net models, evaluated through Dice Coefficient (DSC), Intersection over Union (IoU), Hausdorff Distance (HD95), and Pixel-Wise Accuracy. Radiomic features were extracted from segmented masks, with Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) employed to select significant features. Classifiers including Logistic Regression, XGBoost, CatBoost, and a Stacking Ensemble model were applied to classify tumors into benign or malignant. Classification performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, F1 score, and AUC-ROC. SHAP analysis validated feature importance, and Q-value heatmaps evaluated statistical significance.ResultsThe Transformer-based model achieved superior segmentation results with DSC (0.94 ± 0.01 training, 0.92 ± 0.02 test), IoU (0.91 ± 0.01 training, 0.89 ± 0.02 test), HD95 (3.0 ± 0.3 mm training, 3.3 ± 0.4 mm test), and Pixel-Wise Accuracy (0.96 ± 0.01 training, 0.94 ± 0.02 test), consistently outperforming U-Net across all metrics. For classification, Transformer-segmented features with the Stacking Ensemble achieved the highest test results: 93% accuracy, 92% sensitivity, 93% F1 score, and 95% AUC. U-Net-segmented features achieved lower metrics, with the best test accuracy at 84%. SHAP analysis confirmed the importance of features like Gray-Level Non-Uniformity and Zone Entropy.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the superiority of Transformer-based segmentation integrated with radiomic feature selection and robust classification models. The framework provides a precise and interpretable solution for breast cancer diagnosis, with potential for scalability to 3D imaging and multimodal datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":49948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"8953996251351624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiomics meets transformers: A novel approach to tumor segmentation and classification in mammography for breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed J Saadh, Qusay Mohammed Hussain, Rafid Jihad Albadr, Hardik Doshi, M M Rekha, Mayank Kundlas, Amrita Pal, Jasur Rizaev, Waam Mohammed Taher, Mariem Alwan, Mahmod Jasem Jawad, Ali M Ali Al-Nuaimi, Bagher Farhood\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08953996251351624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop a robust framework for breast cancer diagnosis by integrating advanced segmentation and classification approaches. Transformer-based and U-Net segmentation models were combined with radiomic feature extraction and machine learning classifiers to improve segmentation precision and classification accuracy in mammographic images.Materials and MethodsA multi-center dataset of 8000 mammograms (4200 normal, 3800 abnormal) was used. Segmentation was performed using Transformer-based and U-Net models, evaluated through Dice Coefficient (DSC), Intersection over Union (IoU), Hausdorff Distance (HD95), and Pixel-Wise Accuracy. Radiomic features were extracted from segmented masks, with Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) employed to select significant features. Classifiers including Logistic Regression, XGBoost, CatBoost, and a Stacking Ensemble model were applied to classify tumors into benign or malignant. Classification performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, F1 score, and AUC-ROC. SHAP analysis validated feature importance, and Q-value heatmaps evaluated statistical significance.ResultsThe Transformer-based model achieved superior segmentation results with DSC (0.94 ± 0.01 training, 0.92 ± 0.02 test), IoU (0.91 ± 0.01 training, 0.89 ± 0.02 test), HD95 (3.0 ± 0.3 mm training, 3.3 ± 0.4 mm test), and Pixel-Wise Accuracy (0.96 ± 0.01 training, 0.94 ± 0.02 test), consistently outperforming U-Net across all metrics. For classification, Transformer-segmented features with the Stacking Ensemble achieved the highest test results: 93% accuracy, 92% sensitivity, 93% F1 score, and 95% AUC. U-Net-segmented features achieved lower metrics, with the best test accuracy at 84%. SHAP analysis confirmed the importance of features like Gray-Level Non-Uniformity and Zone Entropy.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the superiority of Transformer-based segmentation integrated with radiomic feature selection and robust classification models. The framework provides a precise and interpretable solution for breast cancer diagnosis, with potential for scalability to 3D imaging and multimodal datasets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8953996251351624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08953996251351624\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08953996251351624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的本研究旨在通过整合先进的分割和分类方法,建立一个强大的乳腺癌诊断框架。将基于transformer和U-Net的分割模型与放射学特征提取和机器学习分类器相结合,提高乳房x线图像的分割精度和分类精度。材料与方法采用多中心数据集8000张乳房x光片(4200张正常,3800张异常)。使用基于transformer和U-Net模型进行分割,通过Dice Coefficient (DSC)、Intersection over Union (IoU)、Hausdorff Distance (HD95)和Pixel-Wise Accuracy进行评估。利用递归特征消除法(RFE)和方差分析法(ANOVA)选择显著特征,从分割后的掩模中提取放射组学特征。分类器包括Logistic回归、XGBoost、CatBoost和堆叠集成模型,用于将肿瘤分为良性或恶性。采用准确性、敏感性、F1评分和AUC-ROC评价分类效果。SHAP分析验证了特征重要性,q值热图评估了统计显著性。结果基于transformer的模型在DSC(0.94±0.01训练值,0.92±0.02测试值)、IoU(0.91±0.01训练值,0.89±0.02测试值)、HD95(3.0±0.3 mm训练值,3.3±0.4 mm测试值)和Pixel-Wise Accuracy(0.96±0.01训练值,0.94±0.02测试值)上均取得了较好的分割效果,在所有指标上均优于U-Net。对于分类,使用Stacking Ensemble的Transformer-segmented feature获得了最高的测试结果:93%的准确率,92%的灵敏度,93%的F1分数和95%的AUC。u - net分割的特征实现了较低的指标,最佳测试准确率为84%。SHAP分析证实了灰度非均匀性和区域熵等特征的重要性。结论结合放射学特征选择和鲁棒分类模型,验证了基于变压器的图像分割方法的优越性。该框架为乳腺癌诊断提供了精确且可解释的解决方案,具有可扩展到3D成像和多模态数据集的潜力。
Radiomics meets transformers: A novel approach to tumor segmentation and classification in mammography for breast cancer.
ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop a robust framework for breast cancer diagnosis by integrating advanced segmentation and classification approaches. Transformer-based and U-Net segmentation models were combined with radiomic feature extraction and machine learning classifiers to improve segmentation precision and classification accuracy in mammographic images.Materials and MethodsA multi-center dataset of 8000 mammograms (4200 normal, 3800 abnormal) was used. Segmentation was performed using Transformer-based and U-Net models, evaluated through Dice Coefficient (DSC), Intersection over Union (IoU), Hausdorff Distance (HD95), and Pixel-Wise Accuracy. Radiomic features were extracted from segmented masks, with Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) employed to select significant features. Classifiers including Logistic Regression, XGBoost, CatBoost, and a Stacking Ensemble model were applied to classify tumors into benign or malignant. Classification performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, F1 score, and AUC-ROC. SHAP analysis validated feature importance, and Q-value heatmaps evaluated statistical significance.ResultsThe Transformer-based model achieved superior segmentation results with DSC (0.94 ± 0.01 training, 0.92 ± 0.02 test), IoU (0.91 ± 0.01 training, 0.89 ± 0.02 test), HD95 (3.0 ± 0.3 mm training, 3.3 ± 0.4 mm test), and Pixel-Wise Accuracy (0.96 ± 0.01 training, 0.94 ± 0.02 test), consistently outperforming U-Net across all metrics. For classification, Transformer-segmented features with the Stacking Ensemble achieved the highest test results: 93% accuracy, 92% sensitivity, 93% F1 score, and 95% AUC. U-Net-segmented features achieved lower metrics, with the best test accuracy at 84%. SHAP analysis confirmed the importance of features like Gray-Level Non-Uniformity and Zone Entropy.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the superiority of Transformer-based segmentation integrated with radiomic feature selection and robust classification models. The framework provides a precise and interpretable solution for breast cancer diagnosis, with potential for scalability to 3D imaging and multimodal datasets.
期刊介绍:
Research areas within the scope of the journal include:
Interaction of x-rays with matter: x-ray phenomena, biological effects of radiation, radiation safety and optical constants
X-ray sources: x-rays from synchrotrons, x-ray lasers, plasmas, and other sources, conventional or unconventional
Optical elements: grazing incidence optics, multilayer mirrors, zone plates, gratings, other diffraction optics
Optical instruments: interferometers, spectrometers, microscopes, telescopes, microprobes