Wanda Martin Burton, Jala Lockhart, Stefanie A Wind
{"title":"探讨黑人女大学生性别种族微侵犯量表的心理测量特征:项目反应理论分析。","authors":"Wanda Martin Burton, Jala Lockhart, Stefanie A Wind","doi":"10.1037/cdp0000765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We examined item ordering and model-data fit related to items and persons for the frequency and stress appraisal versions of the Gendered Racial Microaggressions Scale (GRMS) using an item response theory approach.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>With a sample that included 153 Black college women attending a predominantly White institution in the Southeast United States, we used the partial credit model to evaluate the psychometric properties of the GRMS. We examined model-data fit, rating scale functioning, and item and person locations for the frequency and stress appraisal versions of the items. We compared item ordering between the two versions of the items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preliminary analyses suggested that some items did not fit the partial credit model requirements well, and the original rating scale included some uninformative categories. After we dropped several items and recoded the scale, the GRMS exhibited defensible psychometric properties. Our results indicated that there is a progression of various gendered racial microaggressions (GRMs) both in terms of frequency and stress appraisal and that participants distinguished between these GRMs effectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GRMS exhibited acceptable psychometric properties and can be used to understand the progression and nature of GRMs as a construct and to identify individuals who experience different frequencies and stress appraisals of GRMs. This instrument warrants use and exploration in future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48151,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the psychometric characteristics of the Gendered Racial Microaggressions Scale in Black college women: Item response theory analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wanda Martin Burton, Jala Lockhart, Stefanie A Wind\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cdp0000765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We examined item ordering and model-data fit related to items and persons for the frequency and stress appraisal versions of the Gendered Racial Microaggressions Scale (GRMS) using an item response theory approach.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>With a sample that included 153 Black college women attending a predominantly White institution in the Southeast United States, we used the partial credit model to evaluate the psychometric properties of the GRMS. We examined model-data fit, rating scale functioning, and item and person locations for the frequency and stress appraisal versions of the items. We compared item ordering between the two versions of the items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preliminary analyses suggested that some items did not fit the partial credit model requirements well, and the original rating scale included some uninformative categories. After we dropped several items and recoded the scale, the GRMS exhibited defensible psychometric properties. Our results indicated that there is a progression of various gendered racial microaggressions (GRMs) both in terms of frequency and stress appraisal and that participants distinguished between these GRMs effectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GRMS exhibited acceptable psychometric properties and can be used to understand the progression and nature of GRMs as a construct and to identify individuals who experience different frequencies and stress appraisals of GRMs. This instrument warrants use and exploration in future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000765\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000765","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:采用项目反应理论方法,对性别化种族微侵犯量表(GRMS)的频率和压力评估版本进行项目排序和与项目和人相关的模型数据拟合。方法:以美国东南部一所以白人为主的大学的153名黑人女大学生为样本,我们使用部分学分模型来评估GRMS的心理测量特性。我们检查了模型数据拟合、评定量表功能以及项目和人的位置,以确定项目的频率和压力评估版本。我们比较了两个版本的项目排序。结果:初步分析表明,部分项目不符合部分信用模型要求,原评定量表中包含了一些信息不充分的类别。在我们删除了几个项目并重新编码量表后,GRMS显示出可防御的心理测量特性。本研究结果表明,不同性别种族微侵犯(GRMs)在频率和压力评估方面都有进展,并且参与者能够有效地区分这些GRMs。结论:GRMS表现出可接受的心理测量特性,可用于理解GRMS作为一个结构的进展和性质,并可用于识别经历不同频率和压力评估的GRMS个体。该仪器值得在未来的研究中使用和探索。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Exploring the psychometric characteristics of the Gendered Racial Microaggressions Scale in Black college women: Item response theory analysis.
Objectives: We examined item ordering and model-data fit related to items and persons for the frequency and stress appraisal versions of the Gendered Racial Microaggressions Scale (GRMS) using an item response theory approach.
Method: With a sample that included 153 Black college women attending a predominantly White institution in the Southeast United States, we used the partial credit model to evaluate the psychometric properties of the GRMS. We examined model-data fit, rating scale functioning, and item and person locations for the frequency and stress appraisal versions of the items. We compared item ordering between the two versions of the items.
Results: Preliminary analyses suggested that some items did not fit the partial credit model requirements well, and the original rating scale included some uninformative categories. After we dropped several items and recoded the scale, the GRMS exhibited defensible psychometric properties. Our results indicated that there is a progression of various gendered racial microaggressions (GRMs) both in terms of frequency and stress appraisal and that participants distinguished between these GRMs effectively.
Conclusions: The GRMS exhibited acceptable psychometric properties and can be used to understand the progression and nature of GRMs as a construct and to identify individuals who experience different frequencies and stress appraisals of GRMs. This instrument warrants use and exploration in future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology seeks to publish theoretical, conceptual, research, and case study articles that promote the development of knowledge and understanding, application of psychological principles, and scholarly analysis of social–political forces affecting racial and ethnic minorities.