肩关节部位肩肌皮质脊髓兴奋性的变化。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1152/jn.00296.2025
Garrick N Forman, Kailynn Mannella, Robin MacKenzie, Davis A Forman, Alan C Cudlip, Michael W R Holmes
{"title":"肩关节部位肩肌皮质脊髓兴奋性的变化。","authors":"Garrick N Forman, Kailynn Mannella, Robin MacKenzie, Davis A Forman, Alan C Cudlip, Michael W R Holmes","doi":"10.1152/jn.00296.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The shoulder is a complex region of the body that can be prone to injury associated with awkward postures due to a broad range of motion and relatively low stability. A better understanding of how arm orientation influences neural drive (excitability) to muscles surrounding the glenohumeral joint can provide insight into recruitment strategies. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of glenohumeral joint angle on excitability of the muscles surrounding the shoulder complex. Ten participants underwent transcranial magnetic stimulation in five randomized joint angles: neutral, 45°, and 90° of elevation in shoulder flexion and abduction. Surface electromyography was collected from eight muscles of the dominant arm: biceps brachii, triceps brachii, anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and upper trapezius. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited as stimulus response curves (SRC) in the resting muscles, with intensities of 85/100/115/130/145/160% of resting motor threshold. Results of this work revealed an angle and stimulus intensity interaction; 90° of shoulder abduction elicited the greatest MEP amplitudes across all intensities, whereas neutral resulted in the lowest MEP amplitude. There were main effects of joint angle and muscles, as supraspinatus resulted in the largest variability across neutral, 45° flexion, and 45° abduction as compared with deltoid muscles. This work highlights that changes in glenohumeral joint angle at the shoulder affect corticospinal excitability while at rest. Understanding how posture affects excitability for a range of muscles that surround the shoulder complex could have useful implications for task design and injury prevention.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This work reports the influence of glenohumeral joint angle on resting corticospinal excitability of muscles of the shoulder complex. This work demonstrated that 90° of shoulder abduction resulted in the greatest excitability across all muscles, whereas the neutral position resulted in the lowest MEP amplitude. These findings provide evidence that changes in glenohumeral joint angle affect corticospinal excitability while at rest.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"786-793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in corticospinal excitability of shoulder muscles across functional glenohumeral joint positions.\",\"authors\":\"Garrick N Forman, Kailynn Mannella, Robin MacKenzie, Davis A Forman, Alan C Cudlip, Michael W R Holmes\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/jn.00296.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The shoulder is a complex region of the body that can be prone to injury associated with awkward postures due to a broad range of motion and relatively low stability. A better understanding of how arm orientation influences neural drive (excitability) to muscles surrounding the glenohumeral joint can provide insight into recruitment strategies. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of glenohumeral joint angle on excitability of the muscles surrounding the shoulder complex. Ten participants underwent transcranial magnetic stimulation in five randomized joint angles: neutral, 45°, and 90° of elevation in shoulder flexion and abduction. Surface electromyography was collected from eight muscles of the dominant arm: biceps brachii, triceps brachii, anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and upper trapezius. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited as stimulus response curves (SRC) in the resting muscles, with intensities of 85/100/115/130/145/160% of resting motor threshold. Results of this work revealed an angle and stimulus intensity interaction; 90° of shoulder abduction elicited the greatest MEP amplitudes across all intensities, whereas neutral resulted in the lowest MEP amplitude. There were main effects of joint angle and muscles, as supraspinatus resulted in the largest variability across neutral, 45° flexion, and 45° abduction as compared with deltoid muscles. This work highlights that changes in glenohumeral joint angle at the shoulder affect corticospinal excitability while at rest. Understanding how posture affects excitability for a range of muscles that surround the shoulder complex could have useful implications for task design and injury prevention.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This work reports the influence of glenohumeral joint angle on resting corticospinal excitability of muscles of the shoulder complex. This work demonstrated that 90° of shoulder abduction resulted in the greatest excitability across all muscles, whereas the neutral position resulted in the lowest MEP amplitude. These findings provide evidence that changes in glenohumeral joint angle affect corticospinal excitability while at rest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"786-793\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00296.2025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00296.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肩膀是身体的一个复杂区域,由于活动范围大,相对较低的稳定性,容易因笨拙的姿势而受伤。更好地了解手臂方向如何影响肩关节周围肌肉的神经驱动(兴奋性),可以为招募策略提供见解。本研究的目的是确定肩关节角度对肩关节周围肌肉兴奋性的影响。10名参与者接受了5个随机关节角度的经颅磁刺激:中性、45°和90°肩关节屈曲和外展。采集优势臂8块肌肉的表面肌电图:肱二头肌、肱三头肌、三角肌前、中、后、冈上肌、冈下肌和斜方肌上肌。运动诱发电位(MEPs)在静息肌肉中以刺激反应曲线(SRC)的形式被激发,强度为静息运动阈值的85/100/115/130/145/160%。研究结果揭示了角度与刺激强度之间的相互作用;在所有强度下,肩外展90°诱发的MEP振幅最大,而中性诱发的MEP振幅最低。与三角肌相比,冈上肌的关节角度和肌肉的主要影响是中性、45°屈曲和45°外展的最大变异性。这项工作强调,肩关节角的变化会影响休息时的皮质脊髓兴奋性。了解姿势如何影响肩部周围一系列肌肉的兴奋性,可能对任务设计和伤害预防有有益的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in corticospinal excitability of shoulder muscles across functional glenohumeral joint positions.

The shoulder is a complex region of the body that can be prone to injury associated with awkward postures due to a broad range of motion and relatively low stability. A better understanding of how arm orientation influences neural drive (excitability) to muscles surrounding the glenohumeral joint can provide insight into recruitment strategies. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of glenohumeral joint angle on excitability of the muscles surrounding the shoulder complex. Ten participants underwent transcranial magnetic stimulation in five randomized joint angles: neutral, 45°, and 90° of elevation in shoulder flexion and abduction. Surface electromyography was collected from eight muscles of the dominant arm: biceps brachii, triceps brachii, anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and upper trapezius. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited as stimulus response curves (SRC) in the resting muscles, with intensities of 85/100/115/130/145/160% of resting motor threshold. Results of this work revealed an angle and stimulus intensity interaction; 90° of shoulder abduction elicited the greatest MEP amplitudes across all intensities, whereas neutral resulted in the lowest MEP amplitude. There were main effects of joint angle and muscles, as supraspinatus resulted in the largest variability across neutral, 45° flexion, and 45° abduction as compared with deltoid muscles. This work highlights that changes in glenohumeral joint angle at the shoulder affect corticospinal excitability while at rest. Understanding how posture affects excitability for a range of muscles that surround the shoulder complex could have useful implications for task design and injury prevention.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This work reports the influence of glenohumeral joint angle on resting corticospinal excitability of muscles of the shoulder complex. This work demonstrated that 90° of shoulder abduction resulted in the greatest excitability across all muscles, whereas the neutral position resulted in the lowest MEP amplitude. These findings provide evidence that changes in glenohumeral joint angle affect corticospinal excitability while at rest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信