跌倒的年轻人与走路时意外滑倒后成功恢复的年轻人大脑皮层激活的差异。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Rudri Purohit, Shuaijie Wang, Tanvi Bhatt
{"title":"跌倒的年轻人与走路时意外滑倒后成功恢复的年轻人大脑皮层激活的差异。","authors":"Rudri Purohit, Shuaijie Wang, Tanvi Bhatt","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15070765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Biomechanical and neuromuscular differences between falls and recoveries have been well-studied; however, the cortical correlations remain unclear. Using mobile brain imaging via electroencephalography (EEG), we examined differences in sensorimotor beta frequencies between falls and recoveries during an unpredicted slip in walking. <b>Methods</b>: We recruited 22 young adults (15 female; 18-35 years) who experienced a slip (65 cm) during walking. Raw EEG signals were band-pass filtered, and independent component analysis was performed to remove non-neural sources, eventually three participants were excluded due to excessive artifacts. Peak beta power was extracted from three time-bins: 400 milliseconds pre-, 0-150 milliseconds post and 150-300 milliseconds post-perturbation from the midline (Cz) electrode. A 2 × 3 Analysis of Covariance assessed the interaction between time-bins and group on beta power, followed by Independent and Paired <i>t</i>-tests for between and within-group post hoc comparisons. <b>Results:</b> All participants (<i>n</i> = 19) experienced a balance loss, seven experienced a fall. There was a time × group interaction on beta power <i>(p</i> < 0.05). With no group differences pre-perturbation, participants who experienced a fall exhibited higher beta power during 0-150 milliseconds post-perturbation than those who recovered <i>(p</i> < 0.001). However, there were no group differences in beta power during 150-300 milliseconds post-perturbation. <b>Conclusions</b>: Young adults exhibiting a greater increase in beta power during the early post-perturbation period experienced a fall, suggesting a higher cortical error detection due to a larger mismatch in the expected and ongoing postural state and greater cortical dependence for sensorimotor processing. Our study results provide an overview of the possible cortical governance to modulate slip-fall/recovery outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12293453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Cortical Activations Among Young Adults Who Fall Versus Those Who Recover Successfully Following an Unexpected Slip During Walking.\",\"authors\":\"Rudri Purohit, Shuaijie Wang, Tanvi Bhatt\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/brainsci15070765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Biomechanical and neuromuscular differences between falls and recoveries have been well-studied; however, the cortical correlations remain unclear. Using mobile brain imaging via electroencephalography (EEG), we examined differences in sensorimotor beta frequencies between falls and recoveries during an unpredicted slip in walking. <b>Methods</b>: We recruited 22 young adults (15 female; 18-35 years) who experienced a slip (65 cm) during walking. Raw EEG signals were band-pass filtered, and independent component analysis was performed to remove non-neural sources, eventually three participants were excluded due to excessive artifacts. Peak beta power was extracted from three time-bins: 400 milliseconds pre-, 0-150 milliseconds post and 150-300 milliseconds post-perturbation from the midline (Cz) electrode. A 2 × 3 Analysis of Covariance assessed the interaction between time-bins and group on beta power, followed by Independent and Paired <i>t</i>-tests for between and within-group post hoc comparisons. <b>Results:</b> All participants (<i>n</i> = 19) experienced a balance loss, seven experienced a fall. There was a time × group interaction on beta power <i>(p</i> < 0.05). With no group differences pre-perturbation, participants who experienced a fall exhibited higher beta power during 0-150 milliseconds post-perturbation than those who recovered <i>(p</i> < 0.001). However, there were no group differences in beta power during 150-300 milliseconds post-perturbation. <b>Conclusions</b>: Young adults exhibiting a greater increase in beta power during the early post-perturbation period experienced a fall, suggesting a higher cortical error detection due to a larger mismatch in the expected and ongoing postural state and greater cortical dependence for sensorimotor processing. Our study results provide an overview of the possible cortical governance to modulate slip-fall/recovery outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12293453/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15070765\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15070765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:跌倒和恢复之间的生物力学和神经肌肉差异已经得到了很好的研究;然而,皮层的相关性仍不清楚。我们使用移动脑成像技术,通过脑电图(EEG),检查了在行走中意外滑倒时跌倒和恢复之间感觉运动β频率的差异。方法:我们招募了22名青壮年(15名女性;18-35岁)走路时滑倒(65厘米)。对原始EEG信号进行带通滤波,并进行独立分量分析去除非神经源,最终因伪影过多而排除3名参与者。从中线(Cz)电极扰动前400毫秒、扰动后0-150毫秒和扰动后150-300毫秒三个时间区间提取峰值β功率。2 × 3协方差分析评估了时间箱与组间的相互作用,然后对组间和组内事后比较进行了独立和配对t检验。结果:所有参与者(n = 19)都经历了平衡丧失,7人经历了跌倒。β功率存在时间×组交互作用(p < 0.05)。在扰动前没有组差异的情况下,经历跌倒的参与者在扰动后0-150毫秒内比恢复的参与者表现出更高的β功率(p < 0.001)。然而,在扰动后150-300毫秒内,没有组间差异。结论:在扰动后的早期阶段,表现出更大的β能量增加的年轻人经历了下降,这表明由于预期和正在进行的姿势状态的更大不匹配以及对感觉运动加工的更大皮层依赖性,皮质错误检测更高。我们的研究结果概述了可能的皮质调节滑倒/恢复结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential Cortical Activations Among Young Adults Who Fall Versus Those Who Recover Successfully Following an Unexpected Slip During Walking.

Background: Biomechanical and neuromuscular differences between falls and recoveries have been well-studied; however, the cortical correlations remain unclear. Using mobile brain imaging via electroencephalography (EEG), we examined differences in sensorimotor beta frequencies between falls and recoveries during an unpredicted slip in walking. Methods: We recruited 22 young adults (15 female; 18-35 years) who experienced a slip (65 cm) during walking. Raw EEG signals were band-pass filtered, and independent component analysis was performed to remove non-neural sources, eventually three participants were excluded due to excessive artifacts. Peak beta power was extracted from three time-bins: 400 milliseconds pre-, 0-150 milliseconds post and 150-300 milliseconds post-perturbation from the midline (Cz) electrode. A 2 × 3 Analysis of Covariance assessed the interaction between time-bins and group on beta power, followed by Independent and Paired t-tests for between and within-group post hoc comparisons. Results: All participants (n = 19) experienced a balance loss, seven experienced a fall. There was a time × group interaction on beta power (p < 0.05). With no group differences pre-perturbation, participants who experienced a fall exhibited higher beta power during 0-150 milliseconds post-perturbation than those who recovered (p < 0.001). However, there were no group differences in beta power during 150-300 milliseconds post-perturbation. Conclusions: Young adults exhibiting a greater increase in beta power during the early post-perturbation period experienced a fall, suggesting a higher cortical error detection due to a larger mismatch in the expected and ongoing postural state and greater cortical dependence for sensorimotor processing. Our study results provide an overview of the possible cortical governance to modulate slip-fall/recovery outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信