{"title":"跌倒的年轻人与走路时意外滑倒后成功恢复的年轻人大脑皮层激活的差异。","authors":"Rudri Purohit, Shuaijie Wang, Tanvi Bhatt","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15070765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Biomechanical and neuromuscular differences between falls and recoveries have been well-studied; however, the cortical correlations remain unclear. Using mobile brain imaging via electroencephalography (EEG), we examined differences in sensorimotor beta frequencies between falls and recoveries during an unpredicted slip in walking. <b>Methods</b>: We recruited 22 young adults (15 female; 18-35 years) who experienced a slip (65 cm) during walking. Raw EEG signals were band-pass filtered, and independent component analysis was performed to remove non-neural sources, eventually three participants were excluded due to excessive artifacts. Peak beta power was extracted from three time-bins: 400 milliseconds pre-, 0-150 milliseconds post and 150-300 milliseconds post-perturbation from the midline (Cz) electrode. A 2 × 3 Analysis of Covariance assessed the interaction between time-bins and group on beta power, followed by Independent and Paired <i>t</i>-tests for between and within-group post hoc comparisons. <b>Results:</b> All participants (<i>n</i> = 19) experienced a balance loss, seven experienced a fall. There was a time × group interaction on beta power <i>(p</i> < 0.05). With no group differences pre-perturbation, participants who experienced a fall exhibited higher beta power during 0-150 milliseconds post-perturbation than those who recovered <i>(p</i> < 0.001). However, there were no group differences in beta power during 150-300 milliseconds post-perturbation. <b>Conclusions</b>: Young adults exhibiting a greater increase in beta power during the early post-perturbation period experienced a fall, suggesting a higher cortical error detection due to a larger mismatch in the expected and ongoing postural state and greater cortical dependence for sensorimotor processing. Our study results provide an overview of the possible cortical governance to modulate slip-fall/recovery outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12293453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Cortical Activations Among Young Adults Who Fall Versus Those Who Recover Successfully Following an Unexpected Slip During Walking.\",\"authors\":\"Rudri Purohit, Shuaijie Wang, Tanvi Bhatt\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/brainsci15070765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Biomechanical and neuromuscular differences between falls and recoveries have been well-studied; however, the cortical correlations remain unclear. Using mobile brain imaging via electroencephalography (EEG), we examined differences in sensorimotor beta frequencies between falls and recoveries during an unpredicted slip in walking. <b>Methods</b>: We recruited 22 young adults (15 female; 18-35 years) who experienced a slip (65 cm) during walking. Raw EEG signals were band-pass filtered, and independent component analysis was performed to remove non-neural sources, eventually three participants were excluded due to excessive artifacts. Peak beta power was extracted from three time-bins: 400 milliseconds pre-, 0-150 milliseconds post and 150-300 milliseconds post-perturbation from the midline (Cz) electrode. A 2 × 3 Analysis of Covariance assessed the interaction between time-bins and group on beta power, followed by Independent and Paired <i>t</i>-tests for between and within-group post hoc comparisons. <b>Results:</b> All participants (<i>n</i> = 19) experienced a balance loss, seven experienced a fall. There was a time × group interaction on beta power <i>(p</i> < 0.05). With no group differences pre-perturbation, participants who experienced a fall exhibited higher beta power during 0-150 milliseconds post-perturbation than those who recovered <i>(p</i> < 0.001). However, there were no group differences in beta power during 150-300 milliseconds post-perturbation. <b>Conclusions</b>: Young adults exhibiting a greater increase in beta power during the early post-perturbation period experienced a fall, suggesting a higher cortical error detection due to a larger mismatch in the expected and ongoing postural state and greater cortical dependence for sensorimotor processing. Our study results provide an overview of the possible cortical governance to modulate slip-fall/recovery outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12293453/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15070765\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15070765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differential Cortical Activations Among Young Adults Who Fall Versus Those Who Recover Successfully Following an Unexpected Slip During Walking.
Background: Biomechanical and neuromuscular differences between falls and recoveries have been well-studied; however, the cortical correlations remain unclear. Using mobile brain imaging via electroencephalography (EEG), we examined differences in sensorimotor beta frequencies between falls and recoveries during an unpredicted slip in walking. Methods: We recruited 22 young adults (15 female; 18-35 years) who experienced a slip (65 cm) during walking. Raw EEG signals were band-pass filtered, and independent component analysis was performed to remove non-neural sources, eventually three participants were excluded due to excessive artifacts. Peak beta power was extracted from three time-bins: 400 milliseconds pre-, 0-150 milliseconds post and 150-300 milliseconds post-perturbation from the midline (Cz) electrode. A 2 × 3 Analysis of Covariance assessed the interaction between time-bins and group on beta power, followed by Independent and Paired t-tests for between and within-group post hoc comparisons. Results: All participants (n = 19) experienced a balance loss, seven experienced a fall. There was a time × group interaction on beta power (p < 0.05). With no group differences pre-perturbation, participants who experienced a fall exhibited higher beta power during 0-150 milliseconds post-perturbation than those who recovered (p < 0.001). However, there were no group differences in beta power during 150-300 milliseconds post-perturbation. Conclusions: Young adults exhibiting a greater increase in beta power during the early post-perturbation period experienced a fall, suggesting a higher cortical error detection due to a larger mismatch in the expected and ongoing postural state and greater cortical dependence for sensorimotor processing. Our study results provide an overview of the possible cortical governance to modulate slip-fall/recovery outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.