神经网络分类巴恩斯迷宫搜索策略的应用

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Scott Ferguson, Coral Hahn-Townsend, Benoit Mouzon, Salina Yathiraj, Giovanni Brunetti, Nicole Saltiel, Cillian E. Lynch, Michael Mullan, Fiona Crawford
{"title":"神经网络分类巴恩斯迷宫搜索策略的应用","authors":"Scott Ferguson,&nbsp;Coral Hahn-Townsend,&nbsp;Benoit Mouzon,&nbsp;Salina Yathiraj,&nbsp;Giovanni Brunetti,&nbsp;Nicole Saltiel,&nbsp;Cillian E. Lynch,&nbsp;Michael Mullan,&nbsp;Fiona Crawford","doi":"10.1016/j.brainresbull.2025.111483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Barnes maze is a commonly used test of allocentric spatial reference memory, consisting of an elevated circular table with holes around the perimeter. Spatial cues surrounding the maze are intended to allow the animal on the maze to locate a target hole from which they can escape and return to their home cage during a period of acquisition trials. Following the acquisition period, the target box under the target hole is removed and a probe trial is performed to test spatial memory. One of the limitations of Barnes maze testing is that non-spatial strategies can be employed to locate the target hole, such as systematic serial searching hole to hole, which may mask the signal of spatial learning or memory deficits on gross outcome measures, such as the latency to find the target hole. Quantifying the search strategies used during Barnes maze testing can provide a more direct measurement of spatial memory impairments, and even allow for the detection of impairments to executive functioning and working memory that may impact the ability to utilize non-spatial systematic search strategies. We have developed a machine learning algorithm to automatically quantify search strategy utilization in an unbiased manner. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is known to cause impairments in spatial learning and memory, and in our testing with a model of repetitive mild TBI we have found significant deficits in the utilization of both spatial and systematic non-spatial search strategies 3 months after TBI. Understanding the factors driving gross outcome measures on the Barnes maze may provide greater insight into the effectiveness of potential treatment strategies designed to mitigate the chronic effects of TBI and other neurodegenerative diseases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9302,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research Bulletin","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 111483"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neural network classification of Barnes maze search strategy utilization\",\"authors\":\"Scott Ferguson,&nbsp;Coral Hahn-Townsend,&nbsp;Benoit Mouzon,&nbsp;Salina Yathiraj,&nbsp;Giovanni Brunetti,&nbsp;Nicole Saltiel,&nbsp;Cillian E. Lynch,&nbsp;Michael Mullan,&nbsp;Fiona Crawford\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brainresbull.2025.111483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Barnes maze is a commonly used test of allocentric spatial reference memory, consisting of an elevated circular table with holes around the perimeter. Spatial cues surrounding the maze are intended to allow the animal on the maze to locate a target hole from which they can escape and return to their home cage during a period of acquisition trials. Following the acquisition period, the target box under the target hole is removed and a probe trial is performed to test spatial memory. One of the limitations of Barnes maze testing is that non-spatial strategies can be employed to locate the target hole, such as systematic serial searching hole to hole, which may mask the signal of spatial learning or memory deficits on gross outcome measures, such as the latency to find the target hole. Quantifying the search strategies used during Barnes maze testing can provide a more direct measurement of spatial memory impairments, and even allow for the detection of impairments to executive functioning and working memory that may impact the ability to utilize non-spatial systematic search strategies. We have developed a machine learning algorithm to automatically quantify search strategy utilization in an unbiased manner. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is known to cause impairments in spatial learning and memory, and in our testing with a model of repetitive mild TBI we have found significant deficits in the utilization of both spatial and systematic non-spatial search strategies 3 months after TBI. Understanding the factors driving gross outcome measures on the Barnes maze may provide greater insight into the effectiveness of potential treatment strategies designed to mitigate the chronic effects of TBI and other neurodegenerative diseases.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Research Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"230 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Research Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361923025002953\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361923025002953","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巴恩斯迷宫是一种常用的非中心空间参考记忆测试,它由一个四周有孔的高架圆形桌子组成。迷宫周围的空间线索是为了让迷宫中的动物找到一个目标洞,在一段时间的获取试验中,它们可以从中逃脱并返回到它们的家笼子。采集周期结束后,移除目标孔下的目标盒,进行探针试验,测试空间记忆。巴恩斯迷宫测试的局限性之一是,可以采用非空间策略来定位目标洞,如系统的连续搜索洞到洞,这可能掩盖了空间学习或记忆缺陷的信号,如寻找目标洞的延迟。量化巴恩斯迷宫测试中使用的搜索策略可以更直接地测量空间记忆障碍,甚至可以检测可能影响使用非空间系统搜索策略能力的执行功能和工作记忆障碍。我们开发了一种机器学习算法,以无偏的方式自动量化搜索策略的利用率。众所周知,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)会导致空间学习和记忆障碍,在我们对重复性轻度TBI模型的测试中,我们发现在TBI后3个月,空间和系统非空间搜索策略的使用都出现了明显的缺陷。了解巴恩斯迷宫总体结果测量的驱动因素,可以为减轻创伤性脑损伤和其他神经退行性疾病的慢性影响的潜在治疗策略的有效性提供更深入的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neural network classification of Barnes maze search strategy utilization
The Barnes maze is a commonly used test of allocentric spatial reference memory, consisting of an elevated circular table with holes around the perimeter. Spatial cues surrounding the maze are intended to allow the animal on the maze to locate a target hole from which they can escape and return to their home cage during a period of acquisition trials. Following the acquisition period, the target box under the target hole is removed and a probe trial is performed to test spatial memory. One of the limitations of Barnes maze testing is that non-spatial strategies can be employed to locate the target hole, such as systematic serial searching hole to hole, which may mask the signal of spatial learning or memory deficits on gross outcome measures, such as the latency to find the target hole. Quantifying the search strategies used during Barnes maze testing can provide a more direct measurement of spatial memory impairments, and even allow for the detection of impairments to executive functioning and working memory that may impact the ability to utilize non-spatial systematic search strategies. We have developed a machine learning algorithm to automatically quantify search strategy utilization in an unbiased manner. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is known to cause impairments in spatial learning and memory, and in our testing with a model of repetitive mild TBI we have found significant deficits in the utilization of both spatial and systematic non-spatial search strategies 3 months after TBI. Understanding the factors driving gross outcome measures on the Barnes maze may provide greater insight into the effectiveness of potential treatment strategies designed to mitigate the chronic effects of TBI and other neurodegenerative diseases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Research Bulletin
Brain Research Bulletin 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
253
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The Brain Research Bulletin (BRB) aims to publish novel work that advances our knowledge of molecular and cellular mechanisms that underlie neural network properties associated with behavior, cognition and other brain functions during neurodevelopment and in the adult. Although clinical research is out of the Journal''s scope, the BRB also aims to publish translation research that provides insight into biological mechanisms and processes associated with neurodegeneration mechanisms, neurological diseases and neuropsychiatric disorders. The Journal is especially interested in research using novel methodologies, such as optogenetics, multielectrode array recordings and life imaging in wild-type and genetically-modified animal models, with the goal to advance our understanding of how neurons, glia and networks function in vivo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信