hermes测量的GABA+和谷胱甘肽在内侧颞叶的可重复性

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Marilena M. DeMayo , Mary Botros , Tiffany K. Bell , Mark Mikkelsen , Victoria Mosher , Antis George , Alexander McGirr , Paolo Federico , Ashley D. Harris
{"title":"hermes测量的GABA+和谷胱甘肽在内侧颞叶的可重复性","authors":"Marilena M. DeMayo ,&nbsp;Mary Botros ,&nbsp;Tiffany K. Bell ,&nbsp;Mark Mikkelsen ,&nbsp;Victoria Mosher ,&nbsp;Antis George ,&nbsp;Alexander McGirr ,&nbsp;Paolo Federico ,&nbsp;Ashley D. Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is growing interest in using Hadamard Encoding and Reconstruction for MEGA-Edited Spectroscopy (HERMES) within the mesial temporal lobe (MTL). For cross-sectional group comparisons and longitudinal repeated measures designs, an understanding of the internal and test-retest validity of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA+) and glutathione (GSH) is critical. We therefore evaluated the reproducibility of the consensus recommended semi-localization by adiabatic selective refocusing (sLASER) localization for edited-MRS acquisitions in a challenging region, the MTL.</div></div><div><h3>New method</h3><div>Data were acquired in 15 participants. Single voxel HERMES was collected in the left MTL (two acquisitions) and the right MTL (one acquisition). Participants were repositioned between the two left HERMES acquisitions. An ANOVA was used to assess differences between acquisitions. To assess measurement variation in the repeated left of GABA+ and GSH measures within the left MTL difference values and coefficients of variation (CVs) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no significant differences in metabolite values between any of the acquisitions. The mean difference between the metabolite measures from the repeated left acquisitions centred close to zero, and the average CVs were 14.09 % for GABA+ and 18.94 % for GSH.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison with existing methods</h3><div>The CVs of GABA+ and GSH in the MTL obtained from a HERMES acquisition were comparable to GABA+ or GSH-edited acquisitions in this region, and to data from cortical voxels using HERMES acquisitions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This supports the use of HERMES in the MTL, a challenging region for MRS. However, larger samples and caution in interpretation may be required in repeated-measures designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"423 ","pages":"Article 110542"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility of HERMES-measured GABA+ and glutathione in the mesial temporal lobe\",\"authors\":\"Marilena M. DeMayo ,&nbsp;Mary Botros ,&nbsp;Tiffany K. Bell ,&nbsp;Mark Mikkelsen ,&nbsp;Victoria Mosher ,&nbsp;Antis George ,&nbsp;Alexander McGirr ,&nbsp;Paolo Federico ,&nbsp;Ashley D. Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is growing interest in using Hadamard Encoding and Reconstruction for MEGA-Edited Spectroscopy (HERMES) within the mesial temporal lobe (MTL). For cross-sectional group comparisons and longitudinal repeated measures designs, an understanding of the internal and test-retest validity of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA+) and glutathione (GSH) is critical. We therefore evaluated the reproducibility of the consensus recommended semi-localization by adiabatic selective refocusing (sLASER) localization for edited-MRS acquisitions in a challenging region, the MTL.</div></div><div><h3>New method</h3><div>Data were acquired in 15 participants. Single voxel HERMES was collected in the left MTL (two acquisitions) and the right MTL (one acquisition). Participants were repositioned between the two left HERMES acquisitions. An ANOVA was used to assess differences between acquisitions. To assess measurement variation in the repeated left of GABA+ and GSH measures within the left MTL difference values and coefficients of variation (CVs) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no significant differences in metabolite values between any of the acquisitions. The mean difference between the metabolite measures from the repeated left acquisitions centred close to zero, and the average CVs were 14.09 % for GABA+ and 18.94 % for GSH.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison with existing methods</h3><div>The CVs of GABA+ and GSH in the MTL obtained from a HERMES acquisition were comparable to GABA+ or GSH-edited acquisitions in this region, and to data from cortical voxels using HERMES acquisitions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This supports the use of HERMES in the MTL, a challenging region for MRS. However, larger samples and caution in interpretation may be required in repeated-measures designs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"volume\":\"423 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027025001864\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027025001864","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中颞叶(MTL)中使用Hadamard编码和重建进行大编辑光谱(HERMES)的研究越来越受到关注。对于横断面组比较和纵向重复测量设计,了解γ-氨基丁酸(GABA+)和谷胱甘肽(GSH)的内部效度和重测效度至关重要。因此,我们评估了在具有挑战性的MTL地区,通过绝热选择性重聚焦(sLASER)定位编辑mrs采集的共识推荐的半定位的可重复性。新方法获得15名参与者的数据。在左侧MTL(两次采集)和右侧MTL(一次采集)中采集单体素HERMES。参与者被重新安置在爱马仕的两次收购之间。方差分析用于评估收购之间的差异。为了评估GABA+ 和GSH在左侧MTL内重复测量值的变化,计算差异值和变异系数(cv)。结果各采集点的代谢物值无显著差异。重复左侧获取的代谢物测量值之间的平均差异接近于零,GABA+ 的平均cv为14.09 %,GSH的平均cv为18.94 %。与现有方法的比较HERMES获取的MTL中GABA+ 和GSH的cv与该区域GABA+ 或GSH编辑获取的cv以及使用HERMES获取的皮质体素数据相当。这支持了HERMES在MTL的使用,MTL是mrs的一个具有挑战性的区域。然而,在重复测量设计中,可能需要更大的样本和谨慎的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reproducibility of HERMES-measured GABA+ and glutathione in the mesial temporal lobe

Background

There is growing interest in using Hadamard Encoding and Reconstruction for MEGA-Edited Spectroscopy (HERMES) within the mesial temporal lobe (MTL). For cross-sectional group comparisons and longitudinal repeated measures designs, an understanding of the internal and test-retest validity of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA+) and glutathione (GSH) is critical. We therefore evaluated the reproducibility of the consensus recommended semi-localization by adiabatic selective refocusing (sLASER) localization for edited-MRS acquisitions in a challenging region, the MTL.

New method

Data were acquired in 15 participants. Single voxel HERMES was collected in the left MTL (two acquisitions) and the right MTL (one acquisition). Participants were repositioned between the two left HERMES acquisitions. An ANOVA was used to assess differences between acquisitions. To assess measurement variation in the repeated left of GABA+ and GSH measures within the left MTL difference values and coefficients of variation (CVs) were calculated.

Results

There were no significant differences in metabolite values between any of the acquisitions. The mean difference between the metabolite measures from the repeated left acquisitions centred close to zero, and the average CVs were 14.09 % for GABA+ and 18.94 % for GSH.

Comparison with existing methods

The CVs of GABA+ and GSH in the MTL obtained from a HERMES acquisition were comparable to GABA+ or GSH-edited acquisitions in this region, and to data from cortical voxels using HERMES acquisitions.

Conclusions

This supports the use of HERMES in the MTL, a challenging region for MRS. However, larger samples and caution in interpretation may be required in repeated-measures designs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信