Agathe Osinski , Olivier De Schutter , Xavier Godinot
{"title":"面向发展的思考:与贫困人口共同构建政策的框架","authors":"Agathe Osinski , Olivier De Schutter , Xavier Godinot","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper builds on the results of an international participatory research project that identified nine dimensions of poverty, including six that are “hidden” and typically overlooked in research and policy. Drawing on these dimensions and original case studies conducted in France, Mauritius and a West African country, we propose an approach to policy co-construction and evaluation that includes people experiencing poverty as partners. We offer a methodological framework that is sensitive to hidden dimensions of poverty and provide guidance to navigating the challenges of deliberation in contexts where strong power asymmetries are likely to translate into epistemic injustice. The framework requires four shifts in thinking about participation in development policies: (1) it broadens the definition of poverty to include dimensions beyond deprivation; (2) it acknowledges people in poverty as knowers and agents of change; (3) it relies on a stronger form of participation that goes beyond consultation, where people deliberate as equals and learn from one another; and (4) it transfers part of the policy ownership and decision-making power to people in poverty themselves.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48463,"journal":{"name":"World Development","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 107131"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deliberating towards development: A framework for co-constructing policies with people in poverty\",\"authors\":\"Agathe Osinski , Olivier De Schutter , Xavier Godinot\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper builds on the results of an international participatory research project that identified nine dimensions of poverty, including six that are “hidden” and typically overlooked in research and policy. Drawing on these dimensions and original case studies conducted in France, Mauritius and a West African country, we propose an approach to policy co-construction and evaluation that includes people experiencing poverty as partners. We offer a methodological framework that is sensitive to hidden dimensions of poverty and provide guidance to navigating the challenges of deliberation in contexts where strong power asymmetries are likely to translate into epistemic injustice. The framework requires four shifts in thinking about participation in development policies: (1) it broadens the definition of poverty to include dimensions beyond deprivation; (2) it acknowledges people in poverty as knowers and agents of change; (3) it relies on a stronger form of participation that goes beyond consultation, where people deliberate as equals and learn from one another; and (4) it transfers part of the policy ownership and decision-making power to people in poverty themselves.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Development\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X25002165\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X25002165","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deliberating towards development: A framework for co-constructing policies with people in poverty
This paper builds on the results of an international participatory research project that identified nine dimensions of poverty, including six that are “hidden” and typically overlooked in research and policy. Drawing on these dimensions and original case studies conducted in France, Mauritius and a West African country, we propose an approach to policy co-construction and evaluation that includes people experiencing poverty as partners. We offer a methodological framework that is sensitive to hidden dimensions of poverty and provide guidance to navigating the challenges of deliberation in contexts where strong power asymmetries are likely to translate into epistemic injustice. The framework requires four shifts in thinking about participation in development policies: (1) it broadens the definition of poverty to include dimensions beyond deprivation; (2) it acknowledges people in poverty as knowers and agents of change; (3) it relies on a stronger form of participation that goes beyond consultation, where people deliberate as equals and learn from one another; and (4) it transfers part of the policy ownership and decision-making power to people in poverty themselves.
期刊介绍:
World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, environmental degradation, inadequate scientific and technological resources, trade and payments imbalances, international debt, gender and ethnic discrimination, militarism and civil conflict, and lack of popular participation in economic and political life. Contributions offer constructive ideas and analysis, and highlight the lessons to be learned from the experiences of different nations, societies, and economies.