无阿片类药物年成本:系统回顾和总结分析。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Babasoji E Oyemakinde, Danielle Ryan, Techna Cadet, Tyler Judge, Manesh Gopaldas, Ali Jalali, Sean M Murphy
{"title":"无阿片类药物年成本:系统回顾和总结分析。","authors":"Babasoji E Oyemakinde, Danielle Ryan, Techna Cadet, Tyler Judge, Manesh Gopaldas, Ali Jalali, Sean M Murphy","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Opioids remain a leading cause of death in the United States, and time free from opioid use is a common measure of effectiveness in economic evaluations of opioid use disorder (OUD) interventions. This study reviews the economic evaluation literature on OUD, identifies studies that calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) based on time free from opioids, and establishes a benchmark for comparison in future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review examined economic evaluations of OUD interventions published in the peer-reviewed literature from inception to September 2024. ICERs of cost per period of opioid-free time were extracted or calculated from studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Monetary values were converted to 2024 USD and ICERs normalized to cost per opioid-free year (OfY). Articles were classified by intervention location (United States vs international) and economic perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria: 8 from the United States, 4 from Australia, 1 from Malaysia, and 1 from the United Kingdom. Among the US-based studies, the average ICER per OfY for the healthcare-sector, the state policymaker, and the societal perspective were $243 053/OfY, $17 674/OfY, and $32 125/OfY, respectively. For international studies, average ICERs for the healthcare-sector and societal perspectives were $79 765/OfY and $195 980/OfY, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cost per OfY is a widely used metric in economic evaluations because of its relative importance as a measure of clinical effectiveness. However, a universally accepted benchmark for decision making does not yet exist. This review aggregates data from existing studies that provided this measure, offering an initial step for establishing a cost-effectiveness threshold for cost per OfY.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost per Opioid-Free Year: A Systematic Review and Summary Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Babasoji E Oyemakinde, Danielle Ryan, Techna Cadet, Tyler Judge, Manesh Gopaldas, Ali Jalali, Sean M Murphy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Opioids remain a leading cause of death in the United States, and time free from opioid use is a common measure of effectiveness in economic evaluations of opioid use disorder (OUD) interventions. This study reviews the economic evaluation literature on OUD, identifies studies that calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) based on time free from opioids, and establishes a benchmark for comparison in future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review examined economic evaluations of OUD interventions published in the peer-reviewed literature from inception to September 2024. ICERs of cost per period of opioid-free time were extracted or calculated from studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Monetary values were converted to 2024 USD and ICERs normalized to cost per opioid-free year (OfY). Articles were classified by intervention location (United States vs international) and economic perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria: 8 from the United States, 4 from Australia, 1 from Malaysia, and 1 from the United Kingdom. Among the US-based studies, the average ICER per OfY for the healthcare-sector, the state policymaker, and the societal perspective were $243 053/OfY, $17 674/OfY, and $32 125/OfY, respectively. For international studies, average ICERs for the healthcare-sector and societal perspectives were $79 765/OfY and $195 980/OfY, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cost per OfY is a widely used metric in economic evaluations because of its relative importance as a measure of clinical effectiveness. However, a universally accepted benchmark for decision making does not yet exist. This review aggregates data from existing studies that provided this measure, offering an initial step for establishing a cost-effectiveness threshold for cost per OfY.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:阿片类药物仍然是美国死亡的主要原因,阿片类药物使用的时间自由是阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)干预措施经济评估有效性的常见措施。本研究回顾了OUD的经济评估文献,确定了基于无阿片类药物时间计算增量成本-效果比(ICER)的研究,并为未来研究的比较建立了基准。方法:本综述回顾了同行评议文献中发表的从开始到2024年9月的OUD干预措施的经济评价。从符合纳入标准的研究中提取或计算每段无阿片类药物时间的成本ICERs。货币价值转换为2024美元,ICERs标准化为每无阿片类药物年(OfY)的成本。文章按干预地点(美国与国际)和经济视角进行分类。结果:14篇文章符合纳入标准:8篇来自美国,4篇来自澳大利亚,1篇来自马来西亚,1篇来自英国。在以美国为基础的研究中,医疗保健部门、国家决策者和社会视角的平均每OfY ICER分别为243,053美元/OfY、17,674美元/OfY和32,125美元/OfY。在国际研究中,医疗保健部门和社会观点的平均ICERs分别为79,765美元/年和195,980美元/年。结论:由于其作为临床有效性衡量指标的相对重要性,每OfY成本在经济评估中被广泛使用。但是,目前还没有一个普遍接受的决策基准。本综述汇总了提供该措施的现有研究的数据,为建立每OfY成本的成本效益阈值提供了初步步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost per Opioid-Free Year: A Systematic Review and Summary Analysis.

Objectives: Opioids remain a leading cause of death in the United States, and time free from opioid use is a common measure of effectiveness in economic evaluations of opioid use disorder (OUD) interventions. This study reviews the economic evaluation literature on OUD, identifies studies that calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) based on time free from opioids, and establishes a benchmark for comparison in future research.

Methods: The review examined economic evaluations of OUD interventions published in the peer-reviewed literature from inception to September 2024. ICERs of cost per period of opioid-free time were extracted or calculated from studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Monetary values were converted to 2024 USD and ICERs normalized to cost per opioid-free year (OfY). Articles were classified by intervention location (United States vs international) and economic perspective.

Results: Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria: 8 from the United States, 4 from Australia, 1 from Malaysia, and 1 from the United Kingdom. Among the US-based studies, the average ICER per OfY for the healthcare-sector, the state policymaker, and the societal perspective were $243 053/OfY, $17 674/OfY, and $32 125/OfY, respectively. For international studies, average ICERs for the healthcare-sector and societal perspectives were $79 765/OfY and $195 980/OfY, respectively.

Conclusions: Cost per OfY is a widely used metric in economic evaluations because of its relative importance as a measure of clinical effectiveness. However, a universally accepted benchmark for decision making does not yet exist. This review aggregates data from existing studies that provided this measure, offering an initial step for establishing a cost-effectiveness threshold for cost per OfY.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信