社交媒体的道德和专业使用:活跃在社交媒体上的意大利皮肤科医生的共识。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Lidia Sacchelli, Marta Fusano, Laura Colli, Valentina Trevisan, Rossana Capezzera, Federica Cavallini, Lisa Cecchini, Rosa Frisario, Luciano Galotta, Maria T Luverà, Giovanni Menchini, Luigia Panariello, Michela Starace, Federica Trovato, Andrea Vizzaccaro, Federica Osti
{"title":"社交媒体的道德和专业使用:活跃在社交媒体上的意大利皮肤科医生的共识。","authors":"Lidia Sacchelli, Marta Fusano, Laura Colli, Valentina Trevisan, Rossana Capezzera, Federica Cavallini, Lisa Cecchini, Rosa Frisario, Luciano Galotta, Maria T Luverà, Giovanni Menchini, Luigia Panariello, Michela Starace, Federica Trovato, Andrea Vizzaccaro, Federica Osti","doi":"10.23736/S2784-8671.25.08264-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media has transformed medical communication, providing dermatologists with opportunities for public education, professional visibility, and patient engagement. However, ethical and professional concerns arise due to the lack of dermatology-specific guidelines in Italy. While the National Federation of Orders of Physicians and Dentists (FNOMCeO) offers general recommendations, no targeted framework exists to regulate dermatologists' digital presence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During the 32nd Annual AIDA Congress in May 2024, a working group of 23 dermatologists with active online engagement was formed. Existing ethical frameworks, including the Code of Medical Ethics, were reviewed to identify regulatory gaps. A core team drafted 12 statements, which were refined through a structured discussion and a vote to reach consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The working group developed 12 best practice statements covering key aspects of ethical online engagement, including responsible social media use, conflict-of-interest disclosures, adherence to scientific evidence, patient privacy, and the fight against misinformation. These statements establish clear principles to guide dermatologists in their digital communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first dermatology-specific digital communication consensus in Italy, addressing an urgent need for ethical regulation. These recommendations provide a structured framework for dermatologists, ensuring responsible online engagement while maximizing public health impact. Further regulatory efforts are essential to maintain high professional and ethical standards in the digital era.</p>","PeriodicalId":14526,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":" ","pages":"413-417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical and professional use of social media: Consensus of Italian Dermatologists active on social media.\",\"authors\":\"Lidia Sacchelli, Marta Fusano, Laura Colli, Valentina Trevisan, Rossana Capezzera, Federica Cavallini, Lisa Cecchini, Rosa Frisario, Luciano Galotta, Maria T Luverà, Giovanni Menchini, Luigia Panariello, Michela Starace, Federica Trovato, Andrea Vizzaccaro, Federica Osti\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2784-8671.25.08264-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media has transformed medical communication, providing dermatologists with opportunities for public education, professional visibility, and patient engagement. However, ethical and professional concerns arise due to the lack of dermatology-specific guidelines in Italy. While the National Federation of Orders of Physicians and Dentists (FNOMCeO) offers general recommendations, no targeted framework exists to regulate dermatologists' digital presence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During the 32nd Annual AIDA Congress in May 2024, a working group of 23 dermatologists with active online engagement was formed. Existing ethical frameworks, including the Code of Medical Ethics, were reviewed to identify regulatory gaps. A core team drafted 12 statements, which were refined through a structured discussion and a vote to reach consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The working group developed 12 best practice statements covering key aspects of ethical online engagement, including responsible social media use, conflict-of-interest disclosures, adherence to scientific evidence, patient privacy, and the fight against misinformation. These statements establish clear principles to guide dermatologists in their digital communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first dermatology-specific digital communication consensus in Italy, addressing an urgent need for ethical regulation. These recommendations provide a structured framework for dermatologists, ensuring responsible online engagement while maximizing public health impact. Further regulatory efforts are essential to maintain high professional and ethical standards in the digital era.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"413-417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2784-8671.25.08264-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2784-8671.25.08264-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:社交媒体已经改变了医疗交流,为皮肤科医生提供了公众教育、专业知名度和患者参与的机会。然而,由于意大利缺乏针对皮肤科的指导方针,引起了道德和专业方面的担忧。虽然全国医师和牙医协会联合会(FNOMCeO)提供了一般性建议,但没有针对性的框架来规范皮肤科医生的数字存在。方法:在2024年5月举行的第32届AIDA年会期间,由23名皮肤科医生组成了一个积极在线参与的工作组。审查了现有的伦理框架,包括《医学伦理守则》,以查明监管空白。一个核心小组起草了12份声明,通过有组织的讨论和投票达成共识,对这些声明进行了完善。结果:工作组制定了12项最佳实践声明,涵盖了道德在线参与的关键方面,包括负责任的社交媒体使用、利益冲突披露、坚持科学证据、患者隐私和打击错误信息。这些声明建立了明确的原则,指导皮肤科医生在他们的数字通信。结论:这是意大利首个针对皮肤科的数字通信共识,解决了伦理监管的迫切需要。这些建议为皮肤科医生提供了一个结构化框架,确保负责任的在线参与,同时最大限度地提高公共卫生影响。要在数码时代维持较高的专业和道德标准,进一步的监管工作至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical and professional use of social media: Consensus of Italian Dermatologists active on social media.

Background: Social media has transformed medical communication, providing dermatologists with opportunities for public education, professional visibility, and patient engagement. However, ethical and professional concerns arise due to the lack of dermatology-specific guidelines in Italy. While the National Federation of Orders of Physicians and Dentists (FNOMCeO) offers general recommendations, no targeted framework exists to regulate dermatologists' digital presence.

Methods: During the 32nd Annual AIDA Congress in May 2024, a working group of 23 dermatologists with active online engagement was formed. Existing ethical frameworks, including the Code of Medical Ethics, were reviewed to identify regulatory gaps. A core team drafted 12 statements, which were refined through a structured discussion and a vote to reach consensus.

Results: The working group developed 12 best practice statements covering key aspects of ethical online engagement, including responsible social media use, conflict-of-interest disclosures, adherence to scientific evidence, patient privacy, and the fight against misinformation. These statements establish clear principles to guide dermatologists in their digital communication.

Conclusions: This is the first dermatology-specific digital communication consensus in Italy, addressing an urgent need for ethical regulation. These recommendations provide a structured framework for dermatologists, ensuring responsible online engagement while maximizing public health impact. Further regulatory efforts are essential to maintain high professional and ethical standards in the digital era.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
442
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信