2016-2022年英格兰和威尔士早产儿益生菌使用情况描述

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Alice Aveline, Lisa Szatkowski, Janet Berrington, Kate Costeloe, Alex Bottle, Shalini Ojha, Paul Fleming, Cheryl Battersby
{"title":"2016-2022年英格兰和威尔士早产儿益生菌使用情况描述","authors":"Alice Aveline, Lisa Szatkowski, Janet Berrington, Kate Costeloe, Alex Bottle, Shalini Ojha, Paul Fleming, Cheryl Battersby","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the use of probiotics among preterm infants in neonatal units and explore factors that influence exposure.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational study using prospectively recorded health data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>England and Wales.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>48 048 infants born at <32 weeks gestational age (GA) and admitted to a neonatal unit between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2022.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Measures of probiotic use (number and proportion of infants exposed to probiotics, postnatal age of first probiotic exposure and discontinuation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of infants who received probiotics increased from 9% to 54% over the study period. Median GA of infants given probiotics was 29<sup>+3</sup> weeks (IQR 27<sup>+3</sup>-30<sup>+6</sup>). Probiotics were started on median day 5 (IQR 2-8), earlier for those born at >28 weeks GA (median day 4, IQR 2-7), most frequently after enteral feeds (66% of exposed infants) and were usually discontinued between 32 and 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) (47% at 32<sup>+0</sup>-33<sup>+6</sup> weeks PMA, 33% at 34<sup>+0</sup>-35<sup>+6</sup> weeks PMA). Among infants cared for in probiotic neonatal intensive care units (defined as units where 50% or more infants born <32 weeks gestation were exposed to probiotics), 23% were never given probiotics. Infants from whom probiotics were withheld had a lower gestational age, lower birth weight z score and higher illness severity score or were more mature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By 2022, over half of infants born at <32 weeks GA were exposed to probiotics, but almost one quarter did not receive them despite being in a probiotic unit. Our findings help inform the interpretation of observational data and the design of future studies addressing the continued uncertainty around the safety and efficacy of probiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Description of probiotic use in preterm infants in England and Wales 2016-2022.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Aveline, Lisa Szatkowski, Janet Berrington, Kate Costeloe, Alex Bottle, Shalini Ojha, Paul Fleming, Cheryl Battersby\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the use of probiotics among preterm infants in neonatal units and explore factors that influence exposure.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational study using prospectively recorded health data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>England and Wales.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>48 048 infants born at <32 weeks gestational age (GA) and admitted to a neonatal unit between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2022.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Measures of probiotic use (number and proportion of infants exposed to probiotics, postnatal age of first probiotic exposure and discontinuation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of infants who received probiotics increased from 9% to 54% over the study period. Median GA of infants given probiotics was 29<sup>+3</sup> weeks (IQR 27<sup>+3</sup>-30<sup>+6</sup>). Probiotics were started on median day 5 (IQR 2-8), earlier for those born at >28 weeks GA (median day 4, IQR 2-7), most frequently after enteral feeds (66% of exposed infants) and were usually discontinued between 32 and 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) (47% at 32<sup>+0</sup>-33<sup>+6</sup> weeks PMA, 33% at 34<sup>+0</sup>-35<sup>+6</sup> weeks PMA). Among infants cared for in probiotic neonatal intensive care units (defined as units where 50% or more infants born <32 weeks gestation were exposed to probiotics), 23% were never given probiotics. Infants from whom probiotics were withheld had a lower gestational age, lower birth weight z score and higher illness severity score or were more mature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By 2022, over half of infants born at <32 weeks GA were exposed to probiotics, but almost one quarter did not receive them despite being in a probiotic unit. Our findings help inform the interpretation of observational data and the design of future studies addressing the continued uncertainty around the safety and efficacy of probiotics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306256/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003605\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003605","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解新生儿科早产儿益生菌的使用情况,并探讨其影响因素。设计:观察性研究,使用前瞻性记录的健康数据。环境:英格兰和威尔士。主要结果测量:使用益生菌的测量(接触益生菌的婴儿数量和比例,出生后首次接触益生菌和停药的年龄)。结果:在研究期间,接受益生菌的婴儿比例从9%增加到54%。给予益生菌的婴儿平均GA为29+3周(IQR 27+3-30+6)。益生菌开始于中位数第5天(IQR 2-8),对于出生在bbb28周的婴儿(中位数第4天,IQR 2-7)更早,最常见的是在肠内喂养后(66%的暴露婴儿),通常在月经后32至36周(PMA)之间停止(47%为32+0-33+6周PMA, 33%为34+0-35+6周PMA)。在益生菌新生儿重症监护病房(定义为50%或更多婴儿出生的病房)中接受护理的婴儿中结论:到2022年,超过一半的婴儿出生在益生菌新生儿重症监护病房
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Description of probiotic use in preterm infants in England and Wales 2016-2022.

Objective: To describe the use of probiotics among preterm infants in neonatal units and explore factors that influence exposure.

Design: Observational study using prospectively recorded health data.

Setting: England and Wales.

Patients: 48 048 infants born at <32 weeks gestational age (GA) and admitted to a neonatal unit between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2022.

Main outcome measures: Measures of probiotic use (number and proportion of infants exposed to probiotics, postnatal age of first probiotic exposure and discontinuation).

Results: The proportion of infants who received probiotics increased from 9% to 54% over the study period. Median GA of infants given probiotics was 29+3 weeks (IQR 27+3-30+6). Probiotics were started on median day 5 (IQR 2-8), earlier for those born at >28 weeks GA (median day 4, IQR 2-7), most frequently after enteral feeds (66% of exposed infants) and were usually discontinued between 32 and 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) (47% at 32+0-33+6 weeks PMA, 33% at 34+0-35+6 weeks PMA). Among infants cared for in probiotic neonatal intensive care units (defined as units where 50% or more infants born <32 weeks gestation were exposed to probiotics), 23% were never given probiotics. Infants from whom probiotics were withheld had a lower gestational age, lower birth weight z score and higher illness severity score or were more mature.

Conclusions: By 2022, over half of infants born at <32 weeks GA were exposed to probiotics, but almost one quarter did not receive them despite being in a probiotic unit. Our findings help inform the interpretation of observational data and the design of future studies addressing the continued uncertainty around the safety and efficacy of probiotics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信