“理论上没问题”:一项针对有风险婴儿的家庭和报告有风险睡眠习惯的家庭的更安全睡眠建议的定性研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Becky Lambert, Alice-Amber Keegan, Jenny Ingram, Peter S Blair, Peter J Fleming, Anna Pease
{"title":"“理论上没问题”:一项针对有风险婴儿的家庭和报告有风险睡眠习惯的家庭的更安全睡眠建议的定性研究。","authors":"Becky Lambert, Alice-Amber Keegan, Jenny Ingram, Peter S Blair, Peter J Fleming, Anna Pease","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Safer sleep messages have reduced the rates of sudden unexpected deaths in infancy by 90% in England since 1990. However, deaths continue, mainly in deprived families or where unsafe sleep practices remain common. Understanding the factors influencing these decisions can help further reduce these deaths. This study explores what influences infant sleep-related care practices among caregivers of at-risk infants and those who report non-adherence to safer sleep advice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previously collected survey of infant care practices allowed the identification of 'high scorers' based on a calculated risk score determined by background characteristics and those reporting risky behaviours as 'risky sleepers'. Semistructured telephone/online interviews took place from August to December 2022. Reflexive thematic analysis identified key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine interviews were conducted with 28 families, with 14 'high scorers' and 15 'risky sleepers'. The key themes were trustworthy sources, interpretation of risk and desperate times call for desperate measures. Caregivers of high-risk infants generally understood and followed safer sleep guidance but described rare occasions of compromised safety, usually due to routine disruptions. Those engaging in risky sleep practices cited factors such as sleep deprivation, past experiences, self-identity and personal interpretations of safer sleep advice as influential.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Safer sleep messages are reaching families, but targeted support is needed to prevent rare but fatal incidents. Health professionals should consistently discuss co-sleeping using improved communication strategies to enhance trust. Co-created, accessible and bitesize resources should support parents in problem-solving and planning for safer sleep during disruption to routines.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Okay in theory\\\": a qualitative study of safer sleep advice in families with infants at risk and families reporting risky sleep practices.\",\"authors\":\"Becky Lambert, Alice-Amber Keegan, Jenny Ingram, Peter S Blair, Peter J Fleming, Anna Pease\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Safer sleep messages have reduced the rates of sudden unexpected deaths in infancy by 90% in England since 1990. However, deaths continue, mainly in deprived families or where unsafe sleep practices remain common. Understanding the factors influencing these decisions can help further reduce these deaths. This study explores what influences infant sleep-related care practices among caregivers of at-risk infants and those who report non-adherence to safer sleep advice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A previously collected survey of infant care practices allowed the identification of 'high scorers' based on a calculated risk score determined by background characteristics and those reporting risky behaviours as 'risky sleepers'. Semistructured telephone/online interviews took place from August to December 2022. Reflexive thematic analysis identified key themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine interviews were conducted with 28 families, with 14 'high scorers' and 15 'risky sleepers'. The key themes were trustworthy sources, interpretation of risk and desperate times call for desperate measures. Caregivers of high-risk infants generally understood and followed safer sleep guidance but described rare occasions of compromised safety, usually due to routine disruptions. Those engaging in risky sleep practices cited factors such as sleep deprivation, past experiences, self-identity and personal interpretations of safer sleep advice as influential.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Safer sleep messages are reaching families, but targeted support is needed to prevent rare but fatal incidents. Health professionals should consistently discuss co-sleeping using improved communication strategies to enhance trust. Co-created, accessible and bitesize resources should support parents in problem-solving and planning for safer sleep during disruption to routines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306268/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003620\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003620","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自1990年以来,安全的睡眠信息使英国婴儿猝死率降低了90%。然而,死亡仍在继续,主要发生在贫困家庭或不安全睡眠习惯仍然普遍存在的地方。了解影响这些决定的因素有助于进一步减少这些死亡。本研究探讨了是什么影响了婴儿睡眠相关的护理实践在照顾高危婴儿和那些报告不遵守更安全的睡眠建议。方法:先前收集的一项婴儿护理实践调查允许根据背景特征和报告危险行为为“危险睡眠者”的计算风险评分来识别“高分者”。半结构化电话/在线访谈于2022年8月至12月进行。反思性主题分析确定了关键主题。结果:对28个家庭进行了29次访谈,其中14个“得分高”,15个“睡眠风险高”。关键主题是:可靠的信息来源、对风险的解读以及危急时刻需要采取危急措施。高危婴儿的护理人员通常理解并遵循更安全的睡眠指导,但描述了罕见的安全受损情况,通常是由于日常干扰。那些从事危险睡眠习惯的人认为,睡眠剥夺、过去的经历、自我认同和个人对安全睡眠建议的理解等因素都是有影响的。结论:更安全的睡眠信息正在向家庭传达,但需要有针对性的支持来预防罕见但致命的事件。卫生专业人员应该使用改进的沟通策略来持续讨论共睡,以增强信任。共同创建的、可访问的、可咀嚼的资源应该支持父母在日常生活中断时解决问题和规划更安全的睡眠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

"Okay in theory": a qualitative study of safer sleep advice in families with infants at risk and families reporting risky sleep practices.

"Okay in theory": a qualitative study of safer sleep advice in families with infants at risk and families reporting risky sleep practices.

Background: Safer sleep messages have reduced the rates of sudden unexpected deaths in infancy by 90% in England since 1990. However, deaths continue, mainly in deprived families or where unsafe sleep practices remain common. Understanding the factors influencing these decisions can help further reduce these deaths. This study explores what influences infant sleep-related care practices among caregivers of at-risk infants and those who report non-adherence to safer sleep advice.

Methods: A previously collected survey of infant care practices allowed the identification of 'high scorers' based on a calculated risk score determined by background characteristics and those reporting risky behaviours as 'risky sleepers'. Semistructured telephone/online interviews took place from August to December 2022. Reflexive thematic analysis identified key themes.

Results: Twenty-nine interviews were conducted with 28 families, with 14 'high scorers' and 15 'risky sleepers'. The key themes were trustworthy sources, interpretation of risk and desperate times call for desperate measures. Caregivers of high-risk infants generally understood and followed safer sleep guidance but described rare occasions of compromised safety, usually due to routine disruptions. Those engaging in risky sleep practices cited factors such as sleep deprivation, past experiences, self-identity and personal interpretations of safer sleep advice as influential.

Conclusions: Safer sleep messages are reaching families, but targeted support is needed to prevent rare but fatal incidents. Health professionals should consistently discuss co-sleeping using improved communication strategies to enhance trust. Co-created, accessible and bitesize resources should support parents in problem-solving and planning for safer sleep during disruption to routines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信