撒哈拉以南非洲的土壤酸度修复需要有针对性的投资

João Vasco Silva, Fernando Aramburu-Merlos, Frédéric Baudron, Samuel Gameda, Tesfaye Shiferaw Sida, Vicky Ruganzu, Joel Meliyo, Moti Jaleta, Jordan Chamberlin, Robert J. Hijmans
{"title":"撒哈拉以南非洲的土壤酸度修复需要有针对性的投资","authors":"João Vasco Silva, Fernando Aramburu-Merlos, Frédéric Baudron, Samuel Gameda, Tesfaye Shiferaw Sida, Vicky Ruganzu, Joel Meliyo, Moti Jaleta, Jordan Chamberlin, Robert J. Hijmans","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01194-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Acid soils are widespread across sub-Saharan Africa. Agricultural lime can be used to alleviate production constraints associated with soil acidity, but lime is not widely available in the region, and it is unclear if applying it would be profitable. Using lime requirement models and crop yield responses to soil acidity modelled as plateau–linear decay functions, we estimated the profitability of acid soil remediation through liming. Crop yield loss to soil acidity occurs on 32.7 Mha, or 23% of sub-Saharan Africa’s cropland. The burden of acid soils is US$6.0 billion (6% of the current production value), and 75% of that could be profitably alleviated. Under prevailing conditions, liming would be profitable in the year of application on 6.2 Mha (with an average profitability of US$278 ha<sup>−1</sup>) and on 8.8 Mha when lime’s long-term effect is considered. Intensification of crop production and lower relative lime/output prices could make liming profitable on more cropland.</p>","PeriodicalId":19090,"journal":{"name":"Nature Food","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil acidity remediation in sub-Saharan Africa requires targeted investments\",\"authors\":\"João Vasco Silva, Fernando Aramburu-Merlos, Frédéric Baudron, Samuel Gameda, Tesfaye Shiferaw Sida, Vicky Ruganzu, Joel Meliyo, Moti Jaleta, Jordan Chamberlin, Robert J. Hijmans\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43016-025-01194-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Acid soils are widespread across sub-Saharan Africa. Agricultural lime can be used to alleviate production constraints associated with soil acidity, but lime is not widely available in the region, and it is unclear if applying it would be profitable. Using lime requirement models and crop yield responses to soil acidity modelled as plateau–linear decay functions, we estimated the profitability of acid soil remediation through liming. Crop yield loss to soil acidity occurs on 32.7 Mha, or 23% of sub-Saharan Africa’s cropland. The burden of acid soils is US$6.0 billion (6% of the current production value), and 75% of that could be profitably alleviated. Under prevailing conditions, liming would be profitable in the year of application on 6.2 Mha (with an average profitability of US$278 ha<sup>−1</sup>) and on 8.8 Mha when lime’s long-term effect is considered. Intensification of crop production and lower relative lime/output prices could make liming profitable on more cropland.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Food\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Food\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-025-01194-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-025-01194-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

酸性土壤在撒哈拉以南非洲广泛存在。农业石灰可以用来缓解与土壤酸度相关的生产限制,但石灰在该地区没有广泛使用,而且目前还不清楚使用石灰是否有利可图。利用石灰需求模型和作物产量对土壤酸度的响应模型作为高原线性衰减函数,我们估计了通过石灰修复酸性土壤的盈利能力。土壤酸度造成的作物产量损失达32.7亿公顷,占撒哈拉以南非洲耕地的23%。酸性土壤的负担为60亿美元(占当前产值的6%),其中75%可以得到有益的缓解。在一般条件下,施用石灰在当年可获利6.2 Mha(平均获利278 hm2),考虑到石灰的长期影响,可获利8.8 Mha。作物生产的集约化和相对较低的石灰/产量价格可以使石灰化在更多的农田上有利可图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Soil acidity remediation in sub-Saharan Africa requires targeted investments

Soil acidity remediation in sub-Saharan Africa requires targeted investments

Acid soils are widespread across sub-Saharan Africa. Agricultural lime can be used to alleviate production constraints associated with soil acidity, but lime is not widely available in the region, and it is unclear if applying it would be profitable. Using lime requirement models and crop yield responses to soil acidity modelled as plateau–linear decay functions, we estimated the profitability of acid soil remediation through liming. Crop yield loss to soil acidity occurs on 32.7 Mha, or 23% of sub-Saharan Africa’s cropland. The burden of acid soils is US$6.0 billion (6% of the current production value), and 75% of that could be profitably alleviated. Under prevailing conditions, liming would be profitable in the year of application on 6.2 Mha (with an average profitability of US$278 ha−1) and on 8.8 Mha when lime’s long-term effect is considered. Intensification of crop production and lower relative lime/output prices could make liming profitable on more cropland.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信