获得初级保健机会受限对健康相关生活质量的影响。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Anna Wilding, Charlie Moss, Luke Munford, Matthew Sutton
{"title":"获得初级保健机会受限对健康相关生活质量的影响。","authors":"Anna Wilding, Charlie Moss, Luke Munford, Matthew Sutton","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Timely access to healthcare has implications for health through early diagnosis and management of long-term conditions. However, when healthcare services are provided during traditional working hours, this limits workers' ability to attend appointments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used repeated cross-sectional data from full-time employees participating in the National General Practice Patient Survey in England between 2013 and 2017 (N = 1 097 156). We estimated the health-related quality of life effects (measured by EQ-5D-5L) of an individual being unable to take time away from work to attend primary care appointments. We used an instrumental variable approach to overcome endogeneity concerns around health and employment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Jobs constraining primary care access led to significantly lower EQ-5D-5L utility scores (local average treatment effect = -0.101) (95% CI -0.153 to -0.044), representing an 11.4 percentage point decrease at the mean. The effects were concentrated on physical health domains of the EQ-5D-5L rather than mental health, and the effect on pain/discomfort was the largest in magnitude. The negative effect on the EQ-5D-5L utility score was larger in magnitude for individuals with long-term conditions than those without.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improving access to primary care by reducing constraints on access during typical working hours could improve population health. Further investigation is needed of the effects of this access barrier for individuals with long-term conditions, and the cost-effectiveness of different policy approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Constrained Access to Primary Care on Health-Related Quality of Life.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Wilding, Charlie Moss, Luke Munford, Matthew Sutton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Timely access to healthcare has implications for health through early diagnosis and management of long-term conditions. However, when healthcare services are provided during traditional working hours, this limits workers' ability to attend appointments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used repeated cross-sectional data from full-time employees participating in the National General Practice Patient Survey in England between 2013 and 2017 (N = 1 097 156). We estimated the health-related quality of life effects (measured by EQ-5D-5L) of an individual being unable to take time away from work to attend primary care appointments. We used an instrumental variable approach to overcome endogeneity concerns around health and employment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Jobs constraining primary care access led to significantly lower EQ-5D-5L utility scores (local average treatment effect = -0.101) (95% CI -0.153 to -0.044), representing an 11.4 percentage point decrease at the mean. The effects were concentrated on physical health domains of the EQ-5D-5L rather than mental health, and the effect on pain/discomfort was the largest in magnitude. The negative effect on the EQ-5D-5L utility score was larger in magnitude for individuals with long-term conditions than those without.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improving access to primary care by reducing constraints on access during typical working hours could improve population health. Further investigation is needed of the effects of this access barrier for individuals with long-term conditions, and the cost-effectiveness of different policy approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:通过早期诊断和长期疾病的管理,及时获得医疗保健对健康有影响。但是,如果保健服务是在传统工作时间提供的,这就限制了工作人员赴约的能力。方法:我们使用2013年至2017年间参加英国全国全科患者调查的全职员工的重复横断面数据(N= 1,097,156)。我们估计了个人无法从工作中抽出时间参加初级保健预约的健康相关生活质量影响(用EQ-5D-5L测量)。我们使用工具变量方法来克服围绕健康和就业的内生性问题。结果:限制初级保健获得的工作导致EQ-5D-5L效用得分显著降低(当地平均治疗效果= -0.101 (95% CI: -0.153至-0.044)),平均下降11.4个百分点。EQ-5D-5L对生理健康的影响大于对心理健康的影响,且对疼痛/不适的影响最大。长期条件对EQ-5D-5L效用评分的负面影响在程度上大于没有长期条件的个体。结论:通过减少在典型工作时间内获得初级保健的限制,改善获得初级保健的机会,可以改善人口健康。需要进一步调查这种获取障碍对有长期疾病的个人的影响,以及不同政策方法的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Constrained Access to Primary Care on Health-Related Quality of Life.

Objectives: Timely access to healthcare has implications for health through early diagnosis and management of long-term conditions. However, when healthcare services are provided during traditional working hours, this limits workers' ability to attend appointments.

Methods: We used repeated cross-sectional data from full-time employees participating in the National General Practice Patient Survey in England between 2013 and 2017 (N = 1 097 156). We estimated the health-related quality of life effects (measured by EQ-5D-5L) of an individual being unable to take time away from work to attend primary care appointments. We used an instrumental variable approach to overcome endogeneity concerns around health and employment.

Results: Jobs constraining primary care access led to significantly lower EQ-5D-5L utility scores (local average treatment effect = -0.101) (95% CI -0.153 to -0.044), representing an 11.4 percentage point decrease at the mean. The effects were concentrated on physical health domains of the EQ-5D-5L rather than mental health, and the effect on pain/discomfort was the largest in magnitude. The negative effect on the EQ-5D-5L utility score was larger in magnitude for individuals with long-term conditions than those without.

Conclusions: Improving access to primary care by reducing constraints on access during typical working hours could improve population health. Further investigation is needed of the effects of this access barrier for individuals with long-term conditions, and the cost-effectiveness of different policy approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信