Yu Feng, Haoming Wang, Kang Wang, Ziyue Li, Bohao Tan, Qirui Li, Fan Ouyang, Zhangling Chen
{"title":"健康饮料模式与美国成年人全因和特定原因死亡率的关系:一项全国性队列研究","authors":"Yu Feng, Haoming Wang, Kang Wang, Ziyue Li, Bohao Tan, Qirui Li, Fan Ouyang, Zhangling Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12937-025-01179-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Not all beverage items are necessarily beneficial for health, but the potential impact of an overall beverage pattern on health remains unknown. We aimed to examine associations of adherence to an overall healthy beverage pattern with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a prospective cohort of US populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 8,894 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2019), a nationally representative cohort of US populations. Dietary data were collected at baseline based on the 24-h recall dietary interview. Using the data, we calculated a healthy beverage score (HBS), where coffee, tea, and low-fat milk received positive scores, while alcohol, fruit juice, artificially sweetened beverages, sugar-sweetened beverages, and whole-fat milk received reverse scores. A higher HBS reflected a healthier beverage pattern. We used Cox proportional hazards models to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations of HBS with mortality, adjusting for demographics, dietary and lifestyle factors, and medical history.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a mean follow-up of 15.5 years, we recorded 2,363 all-cause deaths, including 761 cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths, 511 cancer deaths, and 1,091 other deaths. Compared with the lowest quartile of HBS, the HRs and 95%CIs of the highest quartile of HBS were 0.79 (0.68, 0.92) for all-cause mortality, 0.75 (0.60, 0.95) for CVD mortality, 0.92 (0.70, 1.22) for cancer mortality, and 0.75 (0.58, 0.98) for other mortality. Inverse linear relationships of HBS with all-cause, and CVD mortality were observed using restricted cubic splines (P<sub>non-linearity</sub> >0.05). These results were consistent across subgroups predefined by age, sex, smoking status, dietary fiber consumption, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, daily energy intake, and Healthy Eating Index-2015. Results were robust in several sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Greater adherence to HBS was associated with a substantially lower risk of all-cause, CVD and other mortality. These findings suggest that greater adherence to a healthy beverage pattern could benefit prevention of premature mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":19203,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations of a healthy beverage pattern with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among US adults: a nationwide cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Feng, Haoming Wang, Kang Wang, Ziyue Li, Bohao Tan, Qirui Li, Fan Ouyang, Zhangling Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12937-025-01179-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Not all beverage items are necessarily beneficial for health, but the potential impact of an overall beverage pattern on health remains unknown. We aimed to examine associations of adherence to an overall healthy beverage pattern with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a prospective cohort of US populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 8,894 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2019), a nationally representative cohort of US populations. Dietary data were collected at baseline based on the 24-h recall dietary interview. Using the data, we calculated a healthy beverage score (HBS), where coffee, tea, and low-fat milk received positive scores, while alcohol, fruit juice, artificially sweetened beverages, sugar-sweetened beverages, and whole-fat milk received reverse scores. A higher HBS reflected a healthier beverage pattern. We used Cox proportional hazards models to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations of HBS with mortality, adjusting for demographics, dietary and lifestyle factors, and medical history.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a mean follow-up of 15.5 years, we recorded 2,363 all-cause deaths, including 761 cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths, 511 cancer deaths, and 1,091 other deaths. Compared with the lowest quartile of HBS, the HRs and 95%CIs of the highest quartile of HBS were 0.79 (0.68, 0.92) for all-cause mortality, 0.75 (0.60, 0.95) for CVD mortality, 0.92 (0.70, 1.22) for cancer mortality, and 0.75 (0.58, 0.98) for other mortality. Inverse linear relationships of HBS with all-cause, and CVD mortality were observed using restricted cubic splines (P<sub>non-linearity</sub> >0.05). These results were consistent across subgroups predefined by age, sex, smoking status, dietary fiber consumption, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, daily energy intake, and Healthy Eating Index-2015. Results were robust in several sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Greater adherence to HBS was associated with a substantially lower risk of all-cause, CVD and other mortality. These findings suggest that greater adherence to a healthy beverage pattern could benefit prevention of premature mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281692/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-025-01179-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-025-01179-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Associations of a healthy beverage pattern with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among US adults: a nationwide cohort study.
Background: Not all beverage items are necessarily beneficial for health, but the potential impact of an overall beverage pattern on health remains unknown. We aimed to examine associations of adherence to an overall healthy beverage pattern with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a prospective cohort of US populations.
Methods: We included 8,894 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2019), a nationally representative cohort of US populations. Dietary data were collected at baseline based on the 24-h recall dietary interview. Using the data, we calculated a healthy beverage score (HBS), where coffee, tea, and low-fat milk received positive scores, while alcohol, fruit juice, artificially sweetened beverages, sugar-sweetened beverages, and whole-fat milk received reverse scores. A higher HBS reflected a healthier beverage pattern. We used Cox proportional hazards models to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations of HBS with mortality, adjusting for demographics, dietary and lifestyle factors, and medical history.
Results: During a mean follow-up of 15.5 years, we recorded 2,363 all-cause deaths, including 761 cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths, 511 cancer deaths, and 1,091 other deaths. Compared with the lowest quartile of HBS, the HRs and 95%CIs of the highest quartile of HBS were 0.79 (0.68, 0.92) for all-cause mortality, 0.75 (0.60, 0.95) for CVD mortality, 0.92 (0.70, 1.22) for cancer mortality, and 0.75 (0.58, 0.98) for other mortality. Inverse linear relationships of HBS with all-cause, and CVD mortality were observed using restricted cubic splines (Pnon-linearity >0.05). These results were consistent across subgroups predefined by age, sex, smoking status, dietary fiber consumption, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, daily energy intake, and Healthy Eating Index-2015. Results were robust in several sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: Greater adherence to HBS was associated with a substantially lower risk of all-cause, CVD and other mortality. These findings suggest that greater adherence to a healthy beverage pattern could benefit prevention of premature mortality.
期刊介绍:
Nutrition Journal publishes surveillance, epidemiologic, and intervention research that sheds light on i) influences (e.g., familial, environmental) on eating patterns; ii) associations between eating patterns and health, and iii) strategies to improve eating patterns among populations. The journal also welcomes manuscripts reporting on the psychometric properties (e.g., validity, reliability) and feasibility of methods (e.g., for assessing dietary intake) for human nutrition research. In addition, study protocols for controlled trials and cohort studies, with an emphasis on methods for assessing dietary exposures and outcomes as well as intervention components, will be considered.
Manuscripts that consider eating patterns holistically, as opposed to solely reductionist approaches that focus on specific dietary components in isolation, are encouraged. Also encouraged are papers that take a holistic or systems perspective in attempting to understand possible compensatory and differential effects of nutrition interventions. The journal does not consider animal studies.
In addition to the influence of eating patterns for human health, we also invite research providing insights into the environmental sustainability of dietary practices. Again, a holistic perspective is encouraged, for example, through the consideration of how eating patterns might maximize both human and planetary health.