传统知识是循环生物经济的核心

Madhura Rao
{"title":"传统知识是循环生物经济的核心","authors":"Madhura Rao","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01205-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mainstream bioeconomic strategies often prioritize uniformity and marketability, transforming biological materials into standardized feedstocks and codifying knowledge into intellectual property, with success measured by the extent to which these innovations can be scaled and replicated across geographies<sup>2</sup>. Although such an approach facilitates broad application, it frequently severs biological materials from the ecological contexts and stewardship necessary for their sustained use and regeneration. By contrast, traditional knowledge systems, that is, skills, practices and insights that emerge from a community’s long-standing relationship with its environment, approach these resources not as commodities, but as components of living systems<sup>3</sup>. Guided by principles of restraint, reciprocity and adaptive reuse, traditional knowledge systems have historically enabled circular flows of food, nutrients and energy<sup>4</sup>.</p><p>Given the climate impacts of industrial food production and the pressure to feed a growing population, the food system is an important focus of circular bioeconomy experimentation<sup>1</sup>. When applied to food, circularity is usually framed through the lens of food waste valorization: transforming surplus and discarded food into new food products, compost, biogas and animal feed among other things. Today, innovation in this area is often seen as groundbreaking, even radical. Yet, the underlying logic of extending the utility of biological materials through cascading uses is hardly novel. Agrarian societies across the world have long managed food and nutrient flows through practices that are, in essence, circular. For instance, in the Andean highlands, surplus potatoes are freeze-dried into chuño for long-term storage under extreme climatic conditions. In parts of West Africa, cassava peels and harvest residues are detoxified through fermentation and reused as livestock feed, reducing both waste and feed costs. In the Mediterranean region, citrus peels are candied, made into liqueurs, used in cleaning products and fed to livestock. Korean households have historically preserved excess or blemished vegetables by fermenting them into kimchi, extending shelf life and maintaining nutritional value across seasons. Coastal and Arctic Indigenous communities reuse fish heads, bones, skins and viscera not only for broths and nutritional supplements, but also for traditional medicines and skin salves.</p>","PeriodicalId":19090,"journal":{"name":"Nature Food","volume":"115 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traditional knowledge at the centre of a circular bioeconomy\",\"authors\":\"Madhura Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43016-025-01205-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Mainstream bioeconomic strategies often prioritize uniformity and marketability, transforming biological materials into standardized feedstocks and codifying knowledge into intellectual property, with success measured by the extent to which these innovations can be scaled and replicated across geographies<sup>2</sup>. Although such an approach facilitates broad application, it frequently severs biological materials from the ecological contexts and stewardship necessary for their sustained use and regeneration. By contrast, traditional knowledge systems, that is, skills, practices and insights that emerge from a community’s long-standing relationship with its environment, approach these resources not as commodities, but as components of living systems<sup>3</sup>. Guided by principles of restraint, reciprocity and adaptive reuse, traditional knowledge systems have historically enabled circular flows of food, nutrients and energy<sup>4</sup>.</p><p>Given the climate impacts of industrial food production and the pressure to feed a growing population, the food system is an important focus of circular bioeconomy experimentation<sup>1</sup>. When applied to food, circularity is usually framed through the lens of food waste valorization: transforming surplus and discarded food into new food products, compost, biogas and animal feed among other things. Today, innovation in this area is often seen as groundbreaking, even radical. Yet, the underlying logic of extending the utility of biological materials through cascading uses is hardly novel. Agrarian societies across the world have long managed food and nutrient flows through practices that are, in essence, circular. For instance, in the Andean highlands, surplus potatoes are freeze-dried into chuño for long-term storage under extreme climatic conditions. In parts of West Africa, cassava peels and harvest residues are detoxified through fermentation and reused as livestock feed, reducing both waste and feed costs. In the Mediterranean region, citrus peels are candied, made into liqueurs, used in cleaning products and fed to livestock. Korean households have historically preserved excess or blemished vegetables by fermenting them into kimchi, extending shelf life and maintaining nutritional value across seasons. Coastal and Arctic Indigenous communities reuse fish heads, bones, skins and viscera not only for broths and nutritional supplements, but also for traditional medicines and skin salves.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Food\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Food\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-025-01205-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-025-01205-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主流生物经济战略往往优先考虑统一性和市场化,将生物材料转化为标准化的原料,并将知识编纂成知识产权,这些创新的成功程度取决于这些创新可以在多大程度上在不同地区进行扩展和复制。虽然这种方法促进了广泛的应用,但它经常使生物材料脱离其持续使用和再生所必需的生态环境和管理。相比之下,传统的知识系统,即从一个社区与其环境的长期关系中产生的技能、实践和见解,不是将这些资源视为商品,而是将其视为生命系统的组成部分。在约束、互惠和适应性再利用原则的指导下,传统知识系统在历史上实现了食物、营养物质和能量的循环流动。考虑到工业化粮食生产对气候的影响以及养活不断增长的人口的压力,粮食系统是循环生物经济实验的一个重要焦点。当应用于食物时,循环通常是通过食物垃圾增值的视角来构建的:将剩余和丢弃的食物转化为新的食品、堆肥、沼气和动物饲料等。如今,这一领域的创新往往被视为开创性的,甚至是激进的。然而,通过级联使用扩展生物材料效用的潜在逻辑并不新颖。长期以来,世界各地的农业社会一直通过本质上是循环的做法来管理粮食和养分流动。例如,在安第斯高地,多余的土豆被冷冻干燥成chuño,在极端气候条件下长期储存。在西非部分地区,木薯皮和收获后的残渣通过发酵解毒并重新用作牲畜饲料,从而减少了浪费和饲料成本。在地中海地区,柑橘皮被制成蜜饯,制成利口酒,用于清洁产品和喂牲畜。韩国家庭历来通过发酵泡菜来保存多余或有缺陷的蔬菜,延长保质期,并在各个季节保持营养价值。沿海和北极土著社区不仅将鱼头、鱼骨、鱼皮和鱼内脏用于制作肉汤和营养补充剂,而且还用于制作传统药物和皮肤药膏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Traditional knowledge at the centre of a circular bioeconomy

Mainstream bioeconomic strategies often prioritize uniformity and marketability, transforming biological materials into standardized feedstocks and codifying knowledge into intellectual property, with success measured by the extent to which these innovations can be scaled and replicated across geographies2. Although such an approach facilitates broad application, it frequently severs biological materials from the ecological contexts and stewardship necessary for their sustained use and regeneration. By contrast, traditional knowledge systems, that is, skills, practices and insights that emerge from a community’s long-standing relationship with its environment, approach these resources not as commodities, but as components of living systems3. Guided by principles of restraint, reciprocity and adaptive reuse, traditional knowledge systems have historically enabled circular flows of food, nutrients and energy4.

Given the climate impacts of industrial food production and the pressure to feed a growing population, the food system is an important focus of circular bioeconomy experimentation1. When applied to food, circularity is usually framed through the lens of food waste valorization: transforming surplus and discarded food into new food products, compost, biogas and animal feed among other things. Today, innovation in this area is often seen as groundbreaking, even radical. Yet, the underlying logic of extending the utility of biological materials through cascading uses is hardly novel. Agrarian societies across the world have long managed food and nutrient flows through practices that are, in essence, circular. For instance, in the Andean highlands, surplus potatoes are freeze-dried into chuño for long-term storage under extreme climatic conditions. In parts of West Africa, cassava peels and harvest residues are detoxified through fermentation and reused as livestock feed, reducing both waste and feed costs. In the Mediterranean region, citrus peels are candied, made into liqueurs, used in cleaning products and fed to livestock. Korean households have historically preserved excess or blemished vegetables by fermenting them into kimchi, extending shelf life and maintaining nutritional value across seasons. Coastal and Arctic Indigenous communities reuse fish heads, bones, skins and viscera not only for broths and nutritional supplements, but also for traditional medicines and skin salves.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信