人类肱二头肌和肱三头肌肌外刺激效应的差异。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-21 DOI:10.1152/jn.00168.2025
Carley L P Butler, Minkyu Lee, Monica A Perez
{"title":"人类肱二头肌和肱三头肌肌外刺激效应的差异。","authors":"Carley L P Butler, Minkyu Lee, Monica A Perez","doi":"10.1152/jn.00168.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animal and human studies indicate that monosynaptic corticospinal connections are more prevalent in biceps than triceps brachii motoneurons. Based on this evidence, we hypothesized that Hebbian stimulation, which targets corticospinal-motoneuronal connections, would enhance corticospinal excitability more in the biceps than the triceps brachii. To test this hypothesis, we assessed motor-evoked potential (MEP) size using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at resting motor threshold (MEP-RMT) and maximum stimulator output (MEP-100%) immediately and up to 30 min poststimulation. During Hebbian stimulation, 180 paired pulses were delivered, with corticospinal volleys evoked by TMS arriving at corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses 1-2 ms before antidromic potentials from brachial plexus electrical stimulation. Central and peripheral conduction times were similar between muscles. We found that both MEP-RMT and MEP-100% increase in the biceps and triceps immediately and up to 30 min poststimulation. The increase in MEP-RMT was greater in the biceps compared with the triceps, whereas MEP-100% changes did not differ between muscles. Since the maximum MEP size was larger in the biceps than in the triceps, we conducted a control experiment testing responses at an intermediate size between MEP-RMT and MEP-100% (MEP-Control), ensuring similar baseline sizes between muscles. Notably, Hebbian stimulation continued to produce a greater increase in MEP-Control in the biceps than in the triceps. These findings suggest that Hebbian plasticity enhances corticospinal excitability more in the elbow flexor than extensor muscles, emphasizing the need to consider muscle-specific innervation patterns when future studies assess the therapeutic effect of this technique in individuals with motor impairment.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Differences in corticospinal projections to elbow flexor and extensor motoneurons are well established. Our findings demonstrate that Hebbian stimulation, based on spike-timing-dependent plasticity, enhances corticospinal excitability more in the biceps brachii than in the triceps brachii. These results highlight the importance of incorporating muscle-specific innervation patterns when designing plasticity-driven therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"887-895"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Hebbian stimulation effects between biceps and triceps brachii in humans.\",\"authors\":\"Carley L P Butler, Minkyu Lee, Monica A Perez\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/jn.00168.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Animal and human studies indicate that monosynaptic corticospinal connections are more prevalent in biceps than triceps brachii motoneurons. Based on this evidence, we hypothesized that Hebbian stimulation, which targets corticospinal-motoneuronal connections, would enhance corticospinal excitability more in the biceps than the triceps brachii. To test this hypothesis, we assessed motor-evoked potential (MEP) size using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at resting motor threshold (MEP-RMT) and maximum stimulator output (MEP-100%) immediately and up to 30 min poststimulation. During Hebbian stimulation, 180 paired pulses were delivered, with corticospinal volleys evoked by TMS arriving at corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses 1-2 ms before antidromic potentials from brachial plexus electrical stimulation. Central and peripheral conduction times were similar between muscles. We found that both MEP-RMT and MEP-100% increase in the biceps and triceps immediately and up to 30 min poststimulation. The increase in MEP-RMT was greater in the biceps compared with the triceps, whereas MEP-100% changes did not differ between muscles. Since the maximum MEP size was larger in the biceps than in the triceps, we conducted a control experiment testing responses at an intermediate size between MEP-RMT and MEP-100% (MEP-Control), ensuring similar baseline sizes between muscles. Notably, Hebbian stimulation continued to produce a greater increase in MEP-Control in the biceps than in the triceps. These findings suggest that Hebbian plasticity enhances corticospinal excitability more in the elbow flexor than extensor muscles, emphasizing the need to consider muscle-specific innervation patterns when future studies assess the therapeutic effect of this technique in individuals with motor impairment.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Differences in corticospinal projections to elbow flexor and extensor motoneurons are well established. Our findings demonstrate that Hebbian stimulation, based on spike-timing-dependent plasticity, enhances corticospinal excitability more in the biceps brachii than in the triceps brachii. These results highlight the importance of incorporating muscle-specific innervation patterns when designing plasticity-driven therapeutic strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"887-895\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00168.2025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00168.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动物和人体研究表明,单突触皮质-脊髓连接在肱二头肌中比肱三头肌运动神经元更普遍。基于这一证据,我们假设以皮质脊髓-运动神经元连接为目标的Hebbian刺激会比肱三头肌更能增强肱二头肌的皮质脊髓兴奋性。为了验证这一假设,我们使用经颅磁刺激(TMS)在静息运动阈值(MEP- rmt)和最大刺激器输出(MEP-100%)时立即和刺激后30分钟评估运动诱发电位(MEP)大小。在Hebbian刺激期间,共传递180对脉冲,经颅磁刺激诱发的皮质脊髓波比臂丛电刺激产生的反负电位早1-2 ms到达皮质脊髓-运动神经元突触。肌肉之间的中枢和外周传导时间相似。我们发现MEP-RMT和MEP-100%在二头肌和三头肌刺激后立即和长达30分钟增加。与肱三头肌相比,二头肌的MEP-RMT增加更大,而MEP-100%的变化在肌肉之间没有差异。由于二头肌的最大MEP尺寸大于三头肌,我们进行了一个对照实验,测试MEP- rmt和MEP-100% (MEP- control)之间的中间尺寸的反应,确保肌肉之间的基线尺寸相似。值得注意的是,Hebbian刺激继续在肱二头肌中产生比肱三头肌更大的MEP-Control增加。这些发现表明,Hebbian可塑性在肘关节屈肌比伸肌中更能增强皮质脊髓兴奋性,这强调了在未来的研究中评估该技术对运动障碍患者的治疗效果时,需要考虑肌肉特异性神经支配模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in Hebbian stimulation effects between biceps and triceps brachii in humans.

Animal and human studies indicate that monosynaptic corticospinal connections are more prevalent in biceps than triceps brachii motoneurons. Based on this evidence, we hypothesized that Hebbian stimulation, which targets corticospinal-motoneuronal connections, would enhance corticospinal excitability more in the biceps than the triceps brachii. To test this hypothesis, we assessed motor-evoked potential (MEP) size using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at resting motor threshold (MEP-RMT) and maximum stimulator output (MEP-100%) immediately and up to 30 min poststimulation. During Hebbian stimulation, 180 paired pulses were delivered, with corticospinal volleys evoked by TMS arriving at corticospinal-motoneuronal synapses 1-2 ms before antidromic potentials from brachial plexus electrical stimulation. Central and peripheral conduction times were similar between muscles. We found that both MEP-RMT and MEP-100% increase in the biceps and triceps immediately and up to 30 min poststimulation. The increase in MEP-RMT was greater in the biceps compared with the triceps, whereas MEP-100% changes did not differ between muscles. Since the maximum MEP size was larger in the biceps than in the triceps, we conducted a control experiment testing responses at an intermediate size between MEP-RMT and MEP-100% (MEP-Control), ensuring similar baseline sizes between muscles. Notably, Hebbian stimulation continued to produce a greater increase in MEP-Control in the biceps than in the triceps. These findings suggest that Hebbian plasticity enhances corticospinal excitability more in the elbow flexor than extensor muscles, emphasizing the need to consider muscle-specific innervation patterns when future studies assess the therapeutic effect of this technique in individuals with motor impairment.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Differences in corticospinal projections to elbow flexor and extensor motoneurons are well established. Our findings demonstrate that Hebbian stimulation, based on spike-timing-dependent plasticity, enhances corticospinal excitability more in the biceps brachii than in the triceps brachii. These results highlight the importance of incorporating muscle-specific innervation patterns when designing plasticity-driven therapeutic strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信