{"title":"人工智能的教育意义:皮尔斯、理性和实用主义格言","authors":"Kenneth Driggers, Deron Boyles","doi":"10.1111/edth.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although Charles Sanders Peirce died over a century before ChatGPT became publicly available, we argue that he remains informative in discussions of AI because of his articulation of the Pragmatic Maxim We argue that Peirce's pragmatism offers two avenues from which the appropriateness or inappropriateness of AI in education can be evaluated: (1) Peirce's redefinition of teaching and learning along the lines of the finite origins of reason allows for a reorientation of education that would circumscribe the uses of AI to those that are dependent on authentic, inquisitive learning; and (2) Peirce's Pragmatic Maxim is used as a test by which myriad applications of AI can be evaluated for appropriateness. This test ensures that uses of AI are directed towards, experience. Rather than making a final determination on the overall desirability or undesirability of AI in education, we offer two methods for discriminating between the two extremes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47134,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATIONAL THEORY","volume":"75 4","pages":"682-701"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational Implications of Artificial Intelligence: Peirce, Reason, and the Pragmatic Maxim\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Driggers, Deron Boyles\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/edth.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although Charles Sanders Peirce died over a century before ChatGPT became publicly available, we argue that he remains informative in discussions of AI because of his articulation of the Pragmatic Maxim We argue that Peirce's pragmatism offers two avenues from which the appropriateness or inappropriateness of AI in education can be evaluated: (1) Peirce's redefinition of teaching and learning along the lines of the finite origins of reason allows for a reorientation of education that would circumscribe the uses of AI to those that are dependent on authentic, inquisitive learning; and (2) Peirce's Pragmatic Maxim is used as a test by which myriad applications of AI can be evaluated for appropriateness. This test ensures that uses of AI are directed towards, experience. Rather than making a final determination on the overall desirability or undesirability of AI in education, we offer two methods for discriminating between the two extremes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EDUCATIONAL THEORY\",\"volume\":\"75 4\",\"pages\":\"682-701\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EDUCATIONAL THEORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/edth.70028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATIONAL THEORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/edth.70028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Educational Implications of Artificial Intelligence: Peirce, Reason, and the Pragmatic Maxim
Although Charles Sanders Peirce died over a century before ChatGPT became publicly available, we argue that he remains informative in discussions of AI because of his articulation of the Pragmatic Maxim We argue that Peirce's pragmatism offers two avenues from which the appropriateness or inappropriateness of AI in education can be evaluated: (1) Peirce's redefinition of teaching and learning along the lines of the finite origins of reason allows for a reorientation of education that would circumscribe the uses of AI to those that are dependent on authentic, inquisitive learning; and (2) Peirce's Pragmatic Maxim is used as a test by which myriad applications of AI can be evaluated for appropriateness. This test ensures that uses of AI are directed towards, experience. Rather than making a final determination on the overall desirability or undesirability of AI in education, we offer two methods for discriminating between the two extremes.
期刊介绍:
The general purposes of Educational Theory are to foster the continuing development of educational theory and to encourage wide and effective discussion of theoretical problems within the educational profession. In order to achieve these purposes, the journal is devoted to publishing scholarly articles and studies in the foundations of education, and in related disciplines outside the field of education, which contribute to the advancement of educational theory. It is the policy of the sponsoring organizations to maintain the journal as an open channel of communication and as an open forum for discussion.