注意差距:在软件工程中支持用户研究的工具所缺少的特性

IF 1.8 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Lázaro Costa , Susana Barbosa , Jácome Cunha
{"title":"注意差距:在软件工程中支持用户研究的工具所缺少的特性","authors":"Lázaro Costa ,&nbsp;Susana Barbosa ,&nbsp;Jácome Cunha","doi":"10.1016/j.cola.2025.101345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>User studies are paramount for advancing research in software engineering, particularly when evaluating tools and techniques involving programmers. However, researchers face several barriers when performing them despite the existence of supporting tools. We base our study on a set of tools and researcher-reported barriers identified in prior work on user studies in software engineering. In this work, we study how existing tools and their features cope with previously identified barriers. Moreover, we propose new features for the barriers that lack support. We validated our proposal with 102 researchers, achieving statistically significant positive support for all but one feature. We study the current gap between tools and barriers, using features as the bridge. We show there is a significant lack of support for several barriers, as some have no single tool to support them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48552,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Languages","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mind the gap: The missing features of the tools to support user studies in software engineering\",\"authors\":\"Lázaro Costa ,&nbsp;Susana Barbosa ,&nbsp;Jácome Cunha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cola.2025.101345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>User studies are paramount for advancing research in software engineering, particularly when evaluating tools and techniques involving programmers. However, researchers face several barriers when performing them despite the existence of supporting tools. We base our study on a set of tools and researcher-reported barriers identified in prior work on user studies in software engineering. In this work, we study how existing tools and their features cope with previously identified barriers. Moreover, we propose new features for the barriers that lack support. We validated our proposal with 102 researchers, achieving statistically significant positive support for all but one feature. We study the current gap between tools and barriers, using features as the bridge. We show there is a significant lack of support for several barriers, as some have no single tool to support them.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Languages\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Languages\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590118425000310\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Languages","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590118425000310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用户研究对于推进软件工程的研究是至关重要的,特别是在评估涉及程序员的工具和技术时。然而,尽管存在支持工具,研究人员在执行它们时仍面临一些障碍。我们的研究基于一组工具和研究人员报告的障碍,这些障碍是在软件工程用户研究的先前工作中确定的。在这项工作中,我们研究了现有工具及其功能如何应对先前确定的障碍。此外,我们还针对缺乏支持的障碍提出了新的功能。我们与102名研究人员验证了我们的建议,除了一个特征外,所有特征都得到了统计上显著的积极支持。我们研究工具和障碍之间的当前差距,使用特征作为桥梁。我们指出,有几个障碍严重缺乏支持,因为有些障碍没有单一的工具来支持它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mind the gap: The missing features of the tools to support user studies in software engineering
User studies are paramount for advancing research in software engineering, particularly when evaluating tools and techniques involving programmers. However, researchers face several barriers when performing them despite the existence of supporting tools. We base our study on a set of tools and researcher-reported barriers identified in prior work on user studies in software engineering. In this work, we study how existing tools and their features cope with previously identified barriers. Moreover, we propose new features for the barriers that lack support. We validated our proposal with 102 researchers, achieving statistically significant positive support for all but one feature. We study the current gap between tools and barriers, using features as the bridge. We show there is a significant lack of support for several barriers, as some have no single tool to support them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Languages
Journal of Computer Languages Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信