近十年来肿瘤学NLP方法的调查,重点是癌症登记应用。

IF 13.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Isaac Hands, Ramakanth Kavuluru
{"title":"近十年来肿瘤学NLP方法的调查,重点是癌症登记应用。","authors":"Isaac Hands,&nbsp;Ramakanth Kavuluru","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11316-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Clinical texts from pathology and radiology reports provide critical information for cancer diagnosis and staging. This study surveys the application of natural language processing (NLP) in cancer registry operations from 2014 to 2024. A total of 156 articles from Scopus and PubMed were reviewed and were categorized by NLP methods, document types, cancer sites, and research aims. NLP approaches were evenly distributed across rule-based (n=70), machine learning (n=66), and traditional deep learning (n=70), with transformer models (n=29) gaining prominence since 2019. Encoder-only models like BERT and its clinical adaptations (e.g., ClinicalBERT, RadBERT) show significant promise, though methods for increasing context length are needed. Decoder-only models (e.g., GPT-3, GPT-4) are less explored due to privacy concerns and computational demands. Notably, pediatric cancers, melanomas, and lymphomas are underrepresented, as are research areas such as disease progression, clinical trial matching, and patient communication. Multi-modal models, important for precision oncology and cancer screening, are also scarce. Our study highlights the potential of NLP to enhance data abstraction efficiency and accuracy in cancer registries, making greater use of cancer registry data for patient benefit. However, further research is needed to fully leverage transformer-based models, particularly for underrepresented cancer types and outcomes. Addressing these gaps can improve the timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of structured data collection from clinical text, ultimately enhancing cancer research and patient outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of NLP methods for oncology in the past decade with a focus on cancer registry applications\",\"authors\":\"Isaac Hands,&nbsp;Ramakanth Kavuluru\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10462-025-11316-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Clinical texts from pathology and radiology reports provide critical information for cancer diagnosis and staging. This study surveys the application of natural language processing (NLP) in cancer registry operations from 2014 to 2024. A total of 156 articles from Scopus and PubMed were reviewed and were categorized by NLP methods, document types, cancer sites, and research aims. NLP approaches were evenly distributed across rule-based (n=70), machine learning (n=66), and traditional deep learning (n=70), with transformer models (n=29) gaining prominence since 2019. Encoder-only models like BERT and its clinical adaptations (e.g., ClinicalBERT, RadBERT) show significant promise, though methods for increasing context length are needed. Decoder-only models (e.g., GPT-3, GPT-4) are less explored due to privacy concerns and computational demands. Notably, pediatric cancers, melanomas, and lymphomas are underrepresented, as are research areas such as disease progression, clinical trial matching, and patient communication. Multi-modal models, important for precision oncology and cancer screening, are also scarce. Our study highlights the potential of NLP to enhance data abstraction efficiency and accuracy in cancer registries, making greater use of cancer registry data for patient benefit. However, further research is needed to fully leverage transformer-based models, particularly for underrepresented cancer types and outcomes. Addressing these gaps can improve the timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of structured data collection from clinical text, ultimately enhancing cancer research and patient outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"volume\":\"58 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267331/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11316-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11316-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自病理和放射学报告的临床文本为癌症诊断和分期提供了关键信息。本研究调查了2014年至2024年自然语言处理(NLP)在癌症登记操作中的应用。我们对来自Scopus和PubMed的156篇文章进行了综述,并按NLP方法、文献类型、癌症部位和研究目的进行了分类。NLP方法均匀分布在基于规则的(n=70)、机器学习(n=66)和传统深度学习(n=70)中,自2019年以来,变压器模型(n=29)获得了突出地位。尽管还需要增加上下文长度的方法,但像BERT这样的仅编码模型及其临床适应性(例如ClinicalBERT, RadBERT)显示出很大的希望。仅解码器模型(例如,GPT-3, GPT-4)由于隐私问题和计算需求而较少探索。值得注意的是,儿童癌症、黑色素瘤和淋巴瘤的代表性不足,疾病进展、临床试验匹配和患者沟通等研究领域的代表性不足。对精确肿瘤学和癌症筛查很重要的多模态模型也很少。我们的研究强调了NLP在提高癌症登记数据提取效率和准确性方面的潜力,使癌症登记数据更好地用于患者利益。然而,需要进一步的研究来充分利用基于变压器的模型,特别是对于代表性不足的癌症类型和结果。解决这些差距可以提高临床文本结构化数据收集的及时性、完整性和准确性,最终提高癌症研究和患者预后。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1007/s10462-025-11316-5获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A survey of NLP methods for oncology in the past decade with a focus on cancer registry applications

A survey of NLP methods for oncology in the past decade with a focus on cancer registry applications

A survey of NLP methods for oncology in the past decade with a focus on cancer registry applications

A survey of NLP methods for oncology in the past decade with a focus on cancer registry applications

Clinical texts from pathology and radiology reports provide critical information for cancer diagnosis and staging. This study surveys the application of natural language processing (NLP) in cancer registry operations from 2014 to 2024. A total of 156 articles from Scopus and PubMed were reviewed and were categorized by NLP methods, document types, cancer sites, and research aims. NLP approaches were evenly distributed across rule-based (n=70), machine learning (n=66), and traditional deep learning (n=70), with transformer models (n=29) gaining prominence since 2019. Encoder-only models like BERT and its clinical adaptations (e.g., ClinicalBERT, RadBERT) show significant promise, though methods for increasing context length are needed. Decoder-only models (e.g., GPT-3, GPT-4) are less explored due to privacy concerns and computational demands. Notably, pediatric cancers, melanomas, and lymphomas are underrepresented, as are research areas such as disease progression, clinical trial matching, and patient communication. Multi-modal models, important for precision oncology and cancer screening, are also scarce. Our study highlights the potential of NLP to enhance data abstraction efficiency and accuracy in cancer registries, making greater use of cancer registry data for patient benefit. However, further research is needed to fully leverage transformer-based models, particularly for underrepresented cancer types and outcomes. Addressing these gaps can improve the timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of structured data collection from clinical text, ultimately enhancing cancer research and patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信