智障家庭在家庭监护下的不良童年经历:一项探索性横断面研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Jessica Vervoort-Schel, Gabriëlle Mercera, Inge Wissink, Tessel Sterenborg, Maroesjka van Nieuwenhuijzen, Peer van der Helm, Ramón Lindauer, Xavier Moonen
{"title":"智障家庭在家庭监护下的不良童年经历:一项探索性横断面研究。","authors":"Jessica Vervoort-Schel, Gabriëlle Mercera, Inge Wissink, Tessel Sterenborg, Maroesjka van Nieuwenhuijzen, Peer van der Helm, Ramón Lindauer, Xavier Moonen","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2025.2525663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Families with intellectual disabilities are overrepresented in child protection systems. However, little is known about how adverse experiences co-occur in this population. This study examined the prevalence and interrelations of original and extended adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and contextual child and family variables in families with intellectual disabilities under family supervision orders (FSOs).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional analysis of 128 Dutch case files concerning children aged 0-17 under an FSO, using structured codebooks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children were exposed to <i>M</i> = 4.4 original ACEs (<i>SD</i> = 2.0); 66.4% experienced four or more. Extended ACEs (e.g., out-of-home placement) and family risk factors (e.g., parental mental health problems, limited social support) were common. Several significant interrelations emerged across child, parent, and resource domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings highlight the need to address co-occurring adversities across family contexts when developing ACE-informed strategies in child protection settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse childhood experiences in families with intellectual disabilities under family supervision orders: An exploratory cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Vervoort-Schel, Gabriëlle Mercera, Inge Wissink, Tessel Sterenborg, Maroesjka van Nieuwenhuijzen, Peer van der Helm, Ramón Lindauer, Xavier Moonen\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/13668250.2025.2525663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Families with intellectual disabilities are overrepresented in child protection systems. However, little is known about how adverse experiences co-occur in this population. This study examined the prevalence and interrelations of original and extended adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and contextual child and family variables in families with intellectual disabilities under family supervision orders (FSOs).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional analysis of 128 Dutch case files concerning children aged 0-17 under an FSO, using structured codebooks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children were exposed to <i>M</i> = 4.4 original ACEs (<i>SD</i> = 2.0); 66.4% experienced four or more. Extended ACEs (e.g., out-of-home placement) and family risk factors (e.g., parental mental health problems, limited social support) were common. Several significant interrelations emerged across child, parent, and resource domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings highlight the need to address co-occurring adversities across family contexts when developing ACE-informed strategies in child protection settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2025.2525663\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2025.2525663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:智力残疾家庭在儿童保护系统中所占比例过高。然而,人们对不良经历如何在这一人群中同时发生知之甚少。本研究考察了在家庭监督令(FSOs)下的智力残疾家庭中,原始不良童年经历和扩展不良童年经历(ace)与情境儿童和家庭变量的患病率及其相互关系。方法:我们使用结构化代码本对128例荷兰0-17岁儿童在FSO下的病例档案进行了探索性横断面分析。结果:儿童暴露于原始ace的M = 4.4 (SD = 2.0);66.4%经历过4次或以上。延长ace(例如,家庭外安置)和家庭风险因素(例如,父母心理健康问题、有限的社会支持)是常见的。在子域、父域和资源域之间出现了几个重要的相互关系。结论:研究结果强调,在儿童保护环境中制定ace知情策略时,需要解决家庭环境中共同发生的逆境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse childhood experiences in families with intellectual disabilities under family supervision orders: An exploratory cross-sectional study.

Background: Families with intellectual disabilities are overrepresented in child protection systems. However, little is known about how adverse experiences co-occur in this population. This study examined the prevalence and interrelations of original and extended adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and contextual child and family variables in families with intellectual disabilities under family supervision orders (FSOs).

Method: We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional analysis of 128 Dutch case files concerning children aged 0-17 under an FSO, using structured codebooks.

Results: Children were exposed to M = 4.4 original ACEs (SD = 2.0); 66.4% experienced four or more. Extended ACEs (e.g., out-of-home placement) and family risk factors (e.g., parental mental health problems, limited social support) were common. Several significant interrelations emerged across child, parent, and resource domains.

Conclusion: Findings highlight the need to address co-occurring adversities across family contexts when developing ACE-informed strategies in child protection settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信