年龄,愤怒和感激:评估老年人建议采纳的在线情感诱导。

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Tarren Leon, Gabrielle Weidemann, Phoebe E Bailey
{"title":"年龄,愤怒和感激:评估老年人建议采纳的在线情感诱导。","authors":"Tarren Leon, Gabrielle Weidemann, Phoebe E Bailey","doi":"10.1177/01640275251362251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older adults prioritize emotion regulation over other cognitively demanding tasks. Thus, emotions requiring regulation may increase reliance on advice when making judgements. An online sample of 42 young, 48 middle-aged, and 42 older adults were randomly allocated to either an anger, gratitude, or neutral emotion induction, using autobiographical recall. A judge-advisor task measured advice-taking, and participants rated their confidence, perceived advice accuracy, and emotions, followed by the general decision-making styles questionnaire. Due to emotion induction failure, a global positive mood score was explored. Although positive mood did not correlate with advice-taking, greater age was associated with lesser avoidant decision-making style, lower pre- and post-advice confidence, and greater positive mood. Perceived advice accuracy was positively correlated with both pre- and post-advice confidence ratings, positive mood, and advice-taking. The present study provides no evidence for age-related differences in the degree of advice-taking, but suggests that different mechanisms likely underpin advice-taking at different ages.</p>","PeriodicalId":47983,"journal":{"name":"Research on Aging","volume":" ","pages":"1640275251362251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age, Anger, and Gratitude: An Online Emotion Induction to Assess Advice-Taking in Older Age.\",\"authors\":\"Tarren Leon, Gabrielle Weidemann, Phoebe E Bailey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01640275251362251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Older adults prioritize emotion regulation over other cognitively demanding tasks. Thus, emotions requiring regulation may increase reliance on advice when making judgements. An online sample of 42 young, 48 middle-aged, and 42 older adults were randomly allocated to either an anger, gratitude, or neutral emotion induction, using autobiographical recall. A judge-advisor task measured advice-taking, and participants rated their confidence, perceived advice accuracy, and emotions, followed by the general decision-making styles questionnaire. Due to emotion induction failure, a global positive mood score was explored. Although positive mood did not correlate with advice-taking, greater age was associated with lesser avoidant decision-making style, lower pre- and post-advice confidence, and greater positive mood. Perceived advice accuracy was positively correlated with both pre- and post-advice confidence ratings, positive mood, and advice-taking. The present study provides no evidence for age-related differences in the degree of advice-taking, but suggests that different mechanisms likely underpin advice-taking at different ages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research on Aging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1640275251362251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research on Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275251362251\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Aging","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275251362251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年人优先考虑情绪调节,而不是其他需要认知的任务。因此,在做出判断时,需要调节的情绪可能会增加对建议的依赖。一个由42名年轻人、48名中年人和42名老年人组成的在线样本被随机分配到愤怒、感激或中性情绪诱导中,使用自传式回忆。一项评判-顾问任务测量了建议的接受程度,参与者对自己的信心、感知到的建议准确性和情绪进行了评分,然后进行了一般决策风格问卷调查。由于情绪诱导失败,我们探索了一个整体的积极情绪评分。虽然积极情绪与接受建议无关,但年龄越大,回避型决策风格越少,建议前后的自信心越低,积极情绪越强。感知建议的准确性与建议前和建议后的信心评级、积极情绪和建议采纳呈正相关。目前的研究没有提供与年龄相关的建议接受程度差异的证据,但表明不同的机制可能支持不同年龄的建议接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Age, Anger, and Gratitude: An Online Emotion Induction to Assess Advice-Taking in Older Age.

Older adults prioritize emotion regulation over other cognitively demanding tasks. Thus, emotions requiring regulation may increase reliance on advice when making judgements. An online sample of 42 young, 48 middle-aged, and 42 older adults were randomly allocated to either an anger, gratitude, or neutral emotion induction, using autobiographical recall. A judge-advisor task measured advice-taking, and participants rated their confidence, perceived advice accuracy, and emotions, followed by the general decision-making styles questionnaire. Due to emotion induction failure, a global positive mood score was explored. Although positive mood did not correlate with advice-taking, greater age was associated with lesser avoidant decision-making style, lower pre- and post-advice confidence, and greater positive mood. Perceived advice accuracy was positively correlated with both pre- and post-advice confidence ratings, positive mood, and advice-taking. The present study provides no evidence for age-related differences in the degree of advice-taking, but suggests that different mechanisms likely underpin advice-taking at different ages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research on Aging
Research on Aging GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Research on Aging is an interdisciplinary journal designed to reflect the expanding role of research in the field of social gerontology. Research on Aging exists to provide for publication of research in the broad range of disciplines concerned with aging. Scholars from the disciplines of sociology, geriatrics, history, psychology, anthropology, public health, economics, political science, criminal justice, and social work are encouraged to contribute articles to the journal. Emphasis will be on materials of broad scope and cross-disciplinary interest. Assessment of the current state of knowledge is as important as provision of an outlet for new knowledge, so critical and review articles are welcomed. Systematic attention to particular topics will also be featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信