心理学专业的心理测试:澳大利亚的一项研究。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Australian Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00049530.2024.2419682
Peter Macqueen, Jo-Anne M Abbott, Nigar G Khawaja, Rebecca Mathews, Douglas Scott, Bruce D Watt
{"title":"心理学专业的心理测试:澳大利亚的一项研究。","authors":"Peter Macqueen, Jo-Anne M Abbott, Nigar G Khawaja, Rebecca Mathews, Douglas Scott, Bruce D Watt","doi":"10.1080/00049530.2024.2419682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In Australia, psychological measurement and testing is a core competency for all registered psychologists. This study aimed to provide a current perspective on the views of Australian psychologists in the use of psychological testing given the lack of recent Australian research.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Psychologists (<i>N</i> = 821) completed online a demographic form and the European Federation of Psychologists' Associations (EFPA) questionnaire on Test Attitudes of Psychologists - Modified (EQTAP-M), refined for the Australian setting. Constructs addressed in the survey included test appreciation, training, technology-based testing, attitudes to test use, and self-rated competence. The sample mean age was 50 years, with 84% over 34 years and 20% being males.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Attitudinal differences, based on demographics and practice endorsement area, were examined. Partial support was obtained for the factorial model of previous EFPA studies. There was no difference in attitudes based upon the gender of the psychologists, but older psychologists reported less favourable attitudes and lower competence for psychological testing. Psychologists holding endorsements in organisational psychology, neuropsychology, and educational and developmental psychology indicated more positive testing attitudes and appreciation than other areas of practice. The application of technology in assessment was identified as an area that warrants further investigation and training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The outcome has theoretical and practical implications for professional bodies and educational institutions that develop policies and training programs relevant to psychological measurement and testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":8871,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Psychology","volume":"76 1","pages":"2419682"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12218523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological testing in the profession of psychology: an Australian study.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Macqueen, Jo-Anne M Abbott, Nigar G Khawaja, Rebecca Mathews, Douglas Scott, Bruce D Watt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00049530.2024.2419682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In Australia, psychological measurement and testing is a core competency for all registered psychologists. This study aimed to provide a current perspective on the views of Australian psychologists in the use of psychological testing given the lack of recent Australian research.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Psychologists (<i>N</i> = 821) completed online a demographic form and the European Federation of Psychologists' Associations (EFPA) questionnaire on Test Attitudes of Psychologists - Modified (EQTAP-M), refined for the Australian setting. Constructs addressed in the survey included test appreciation, training, technology-based testing, attitudes to test use, and self-rated competence. The sample mean age was 50 years, with 84% over 34 years and 20% being males.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Attitudinal differences, based on demographics and practice endorsement area, were examined. Partial support was obtained for the factorial model of previous EFPA studies. There was no difference in attitudes based upon the gender of the psychologists, but older psychologists reported less favourable attitudes and lower competence for psychological testing. Psychologists holding endorsements in organisational psychology, neuropsychology, and educational and developmental psychology indicated more positive testing attitudes and appreciation than other areas of practice. The application of technology in assessment was identified as an area that warrants further investigation and training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The outcome has theoretical and practical implications for professional bodies and educational institutions that develop policies and training programs relevant to psychological measurement and testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"2419682\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12218523/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2024.2419682\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2024.2419682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在澳大利亚,心理测量和测试是所有注册心理学家的核心能力。本研究的目的是提供一个当前的观点,澳大利亚心理学家在使用心理测试鉴于缺乏最近澳大利亚的研究。方法:心理学家(N = 821)在线填写了一份人口统计表格和欧洲心理学家协会联合会(EFPA)心理学家测试态度调查问卷-修改(EQTAP-M),该问卷针对澳大利亚的设置进行了改进。调查中涉及的结构包括测试欣赏、培训、基于技术的测试、对测试使用的态度和自我评价的能力。样本的平均年龄为50岁,34岁以上的占84%,男性占20%。结果:基于人口统计学和实践认可领域的态度差异进行了检查。先前EFPA研究的因子模型得到部分支持。心理学家的性别在态度上没有差异,但年长的心理学家报告的态度不太好,心理测试的能力也较低。持有组织心理学、神经心理学、教育和发展心理学背书的心理学家比其他领域的实践表现出更积极的测试态度和赞赏。在评价中应用技术被确定为一个值得进一步调查和培训的领域。结论:研究结果对制定心理测量和测试相关政策和培训计划的专业团体和教育机构具有理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychological testing in the profession of psychology: an Australian study.

Objectives: In Australia, psychological measurement and testing is a core competency for all registered psychologists. This study aimed to provide a current perspective on the views of Australian psychologists in the use of psychological testing given the lack of recent Australian research.

Method: Psychologists (N = 821) completed online a demographic form and the European Federation of Psychologists' Associations (EFPA) questionnaire on Test Attitudes of Psychologists - Modified (EQTAP-M), refined for the Australian setting. Constructs addressed in the survey included test appreciation, training, technology-based testing, attitudes to test use, and self-rated competence. The sample mean age was 50 years, with 84% over 34 years and 20% being males.

Results: Attitudinal differences, based on demographics and practice endorsement area, were examined. Partial support was obtained for the factorial model of previous EFPA studies. There was no difference in attitudes based upon the gender of the psychologists, but older psychologists reported less favourable attitudes and lower competence for psychological testing. Psychologists holding endorsements in organisational psychology, neuropsychology, and educational and developmental psychology indicated more positive testing attitudes and appreciation than other areas of practice. The application of technology in assessment was identified as an area that warrants further investigation and training.

Conclusions: The outcome has theoretical and practical implications for professional bodies and educational institutions that develop policies and training programs relevant to psychological measurement and testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Psychology
Australian Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Psychology is the premier scientific journal of the Australian Psychological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of psychological research and receives articles on all topics within the broad scope of the discipline. The journal publishes high quality peer-reviewed articles with reviewers and associate editors providing detailed assistance to authors to reach publication. The journal publishes reports of experimental and survey studies, including reports of qualitative investigations, on pure and applied topics in the field of psychology. Articles on clinical psychology or on the professional concerns of applied psychology should be submitted to our sister journals, Australian Psychologist or Clinical Psychologist. The journal publishes occasional reviews of specific topics, theoretical pieces and commentaries on methodological issues. There are also solicited book reviews and comments Annual special issues devoted to a single topic, and guest edited by a specialist editor, are published. The journal regards itself as international in vision and will accept submissions from psychologists in all countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信