唐氏综合症自闭症谱系障碍诊断中的神经行为模式。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Lina R Patel, Meghan O'Neill, Gabriel Anzueto, Darren Olsen, Katherine Pawlowski, Jonathan D Santoro, Georgios Sideridis, Noemi Spinazzi, Nicole T Baumer
{"title":"唐氏综合症自闭症谱系障碍诊断中的神经行为模式。","authors":"Lina R Patel, Meghan O'Neill, Gabriel Anzueto, Darren Olsen, Katherine Pawlowski, Jonathan D Santoro, Georgios Sideridis, Noemi Spinazzi, Nicole T Baumer","doi":"10.1111/jir.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is common in Down syndrome (DS). There are no standardised screening/assessment tools for evaluating ASD in DS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilised a novel validated questionnaire, the ND-PROM, to investigate differences in developmental skills and behaviours among children with DS only, ASD only and DS + ASD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis using ANOVA tests and post hoc t-tests revealed item-level differences between groups in domains specific to ASD (nonverbal communication, social-emotional understanding, social interaction, independent play, restrictive and repetitive behaviours and interests and sensory processes) and not specific to ASD (expressive language, receptive language, adaptive/toileting, challenging behaviours, mental health and impulse/ADHD).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASD-specific symptoms best distinguished DS only and DS + ASD groups, while non-ASD symptoms best distinguished ASD only and DS + ASD groups. Items that best differentiate groups are presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurobehavioural Patterns in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Down Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Lina R Patel, Meghan O'Neill, Gabriel Anzueto, Darren Olsen, Katherine Pawlowski, Jonathan D Santoro, Georgios Sideridis, Noemi Spinazzi, Nicole T Baumer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.70015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is common in Down syndrome (DS). There are no standardised screening/assessment tools for evaluating ASD in DS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilised a novel validated questionnaire, the ND-PROM, to investigate differences in developmental skills and behaviours among children with DS only, ASD only and DS + ASD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis using ANOVA tests and post hoc t-tests revealed item-level differences between groups in domains specific to ASD (nonverbal communication, social-emotional understanding, social interaction, independent play, restrictive and repetitive behaviours and interests and sensory processes) and not specific to ASD (expressive language, receptive language, adaptive/toileting, challenging behaviours, mental health and impulse/ADHD).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASD-specific symptoms best distinguished DS only and DS + ASD groups, while non-ASD symptoms best distinguished ASD only and DS + ASD groups. Items that best differentiate groups are presented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70015\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)常见于唐氏综合征(DS)。没有标准化的筛查/评估工具来评估残疾儿童的自闭症。方法:我们使用了一种新的有效问卷,ND-PROM,来调查仅DS,仅ASD和DS + ASD儿童的发展技能和行为的差异。结果:使用方差分析和事后t检验的数据分析显示,在ASD特有的领域(非语言交流、社会情感理解、社会互动、独立游戏、限制性和重复性行为、兴趣和感觉过程)和非ASD特有的领域(表达语言、接受语言、适应/如厕、挑战行为、心理健康和冲动/多动症)中,各组之间存在项目水平的差异。结论:ASD特异性症状最能区分DS组和DS + ASD组,非ASD症状最能区分DS组和DS + ASD组。展示了最能区分各组的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neurobehavioural Patterns in the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Down Syndrome.

Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is common in Down syndrome (DS). There are no standardised screening/assessment tools for evaluating ASD in DS.

Methods: We utilised a novel validated questionnaire, the ND-PROM, to investigate differences in developmental skills and behaviours among children with DS only, ASD only and DS + ASD.

Results: Data analysis using ANOVA tests and post hoc t-tests revealed item-level differences between groups in domains specific to ASD (nonverbal communication, social-emotional understanding, social interaction, independent play, restrictive and repetitive behaviours and interests and sensory processes) and not specific to ASD (expressive language, receptive language, adaptive/toileting, challenging behaviours, mental health and impulse/ADHD).

Conclusion: ASD-specific symptoms best distinguished DS only and DS + ASD groups, while non-ASD symptoms best distinguished ASD only and DS + ASD groups. Items that best differentiate groups are presented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信