EFSA Panel on Food Enzymes (FEZ), Holger Zorn, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Francesco Catania, Gabriele Gadermaier, Ralf Greiner, Baltasar Mayo, Alicja Mortensen, Yrjö Henrik Roos, Marize de Lourdes Marzo Solano, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Laura Sanmartín Cabo, Yi Liu
{"title":"地衣芽孢杆菌DP-Dzb105转基因食品酶α-淀粉酶的安全性评价","authors":"EFSA Panel on Food Enzymes (FEZ), Holger Zorn, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Francesco Catania, Gabriele Gadermaier, Ralf Greiner, Baltasar Mayo, Alicja Mortensen, Yrjö Henrik Roos, Marize de Lourdes Marzo Solano, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Laura Sanmartín Cabo, Yi Liu","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The food enzyme α-amylase (4-α-<span>d</span>-glucan glucanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified <i>Bacillus licheniformis</i> strain DP-Dzb105 by Genencor International B.V. The production strain met the requirements for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS). The food enzyme was considered free from viable cells of the production organism, but not from its DNA. It is intended to be used in two food manufacturing processes. Since residual amounts of food enzyme-total organic solids are removed in these two processes, dietary exposure was not calculated. Given the QPS status of the production strain and the absence of concerns resulting from the food enzyme manufacturing process, the Panel considered toxicity tests unnecessary. A search for the homology of the amino acid sequence of the α-amylase to known allergens was made and matches with one respiratory allergen and one contact allergen were found. The Panel considered that a risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure to the food enzyme cannot be excluded, but that the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns, under the intended conditions of use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9531","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α-amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP-Dzb105\",\"authors\":\"EFSA Panel on Food Enzymes (FEZ), Holger Zorn, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Francesco Catania, Gabriele Gadermaier, Ralf Greiner, Baltasar Mayo, Alicja Mortensen, Yrjö Henrik Roos, Marize de Lourdes Marzo Solano, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Laura Sanmartín Cabo, Yi Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The food enzyme α-amylase (4-α-<span>d</span>-glucan glucanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified <i>Bacillus licheniformis</i> strain DP-Dzb105 by Genencor International B.V. The production strain met the requirements for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS). The food enzyme was considered free from viable cells of the production organism, but not from its DNA. It is intended to be used in two food manufacturing processes. Since residual amounts of food enzyme-total organic solids are removed in these two processes, dietary exposure was not calculated. Given the QPS status of the production strain and the absence of concerns resulting from the food enzyme manufacturing process, the Panel considered toxicity tests unnecessary. A search for the homology of the amino acid sequence of the α-amylase to known allergens was made and matches with one respiratory allergen and one contact allergen were found. The Panel considered that a risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure to the food enzyme cannot be excluded, but that the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns, under the intended conditions of use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9531\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9531\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
食品酶α-淀粉酶(4-α-d-葡聚糖葡聚糖水解酶,EC 3.2.1.1)是用Genencor International B.V.的转基因地衣芽孢杆菌DP-Dzb105菌株生产的,生产菌株符合安全合格推定(QPS)要求。食用酶被认为不受生产生物体的活细胞的影响,但不受其DNA的影响。它打算用于两种食品生产过程。由于在这两个过程中去除了食物酶-总有机固体的残留量,因此没有计算饮食暴露量。考虑到生产菌株的质量保证体系状态以及食品酶生产过程中不存在引起关注的问题,评估小组认为没有必要进行毒性测试。对α-淀粉酶的氨基酸序列进行了与已知过敏原的同源性搜索,发现与1个呼吸性过敏原和1个接触性过敏原匹配。专家小组认为,不能排除通过饮食接触该食品酶而产生过敏反应的风险,但可能性很低。根据所提供的数据,小组得出结论,在预期的使用条件下,这种食品酶不会引起安全问题。
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α-amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP-Dzb105
The food enzyme α-amylase (4-α-d-glucan glucanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP-Dzb105 by Genencor International B.V. The production strain met the requirements for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS). The food enzyme was considered free from viable cells of the production organism, but not from its DNA. It is intended to be used in two food manufacturing processes. Since residual amounts of food enzyme-total organic solids are removed in these two processes, dietary exposure was not calculated. Given the QPS status of the production strain and the absence of concerns resulting from the food enzyme manufacturing process, the Panel considered toxicity tests unnecessary. A search for the homology of the amino acid sequence of the α-amylase to known allergens was made and matches with one respiratory allergen and one contact allergen were found. The Panel considered that a risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure to the food enzyme cannot be excluded, but that the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns, under the intended conditions of use.
期刊介绍:
The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.