田径天才:肌肉类型匹配的青少年田径运动员未来表现更好。

Jonas Vandecauter,Kim Van Vossel,Freek Van de Casteele,Audrey Baguet,Tine Bex,Wim Derave,Eline Lievens
{"title":"田径天才:肌肉类型匹配的青少年田径运动员未来表现更好。","authors":"Jonas Vandecauter,Kim Van Vossel,Freek Van de Casteele,Audrey Baguet,Tine Bex,Wim Derave,Eline Lievens","doi":"10.1249/mss.0000000000003820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nCurrent talent identification programs struggle to successfully identify young track-and-field talents. This study prospectively investigated whether the distribution of slow and fast muscle fibers predicts future performance over up to 12 years.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nSince 2010, we included 64 talented youth athletes from selective track-and-field elite sport schools (age = 15.7 ± 1.3 years, range 12 to 18 years). Their muscle typology was noninvasively estimated in the gastrocnemius muscle using 3 T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the fast-twitch metabolite carnosine. Youth athletes' muscle typology was compared to a discipline-specific elite athlete benchmark cohort (n = 87, ≥1050 IAAF points). Youth athletes were classified as matches if their muscle typology was within the range (mean ± 1SD) of the elite athletes for their discipline, otherwise classified as mismatches.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFollow-up was on average 5.0 ± 3.6 years after the scan. The matching athletes achieved a significantly higher IAAF-score (987 ± 110 vs 915 ± 93 points, p = 0.011) compared to mismatching athletes, indicating better future performance if muscle typology at youth level matched with muscle typology of the elite benchmark competing in the same discipline. Of all matching athletes, 19% achieved an all-time best score above 1100 IAAF points, i.e. reaching international standards, compared to none with a mismatching muscle typology (p = 0.029).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis prospective study shows for the first time that youth track-and-field athletes who train for a discipline that is deemed optimal based on their muscle typology, will attain a better performance at senior level, opening perspectives for talent identification.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Talents on Track: Better Future Performance in Youth Track-and-Field Athletes with a Matching Muscle Typology.\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Vandecauter,Kim Van Vossel,Freek Van de Casteele,Audrey Baguet,Tine Bex,Wim Derave,Eline Lievens\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/mss.0000000000003820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nCurrent talent identification programs struggle to successfully identify young track-and-field talents. This study prospectively investigated whether the distribution of slow and fast muscle fibers predicts future performance over up to 12 years.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nSince 2010, we included 64 talented youth athletes from selective track-and-field elite sport schools (age = 15.7 ± 1.3 years, range 12 to 18 years). Their muscle typology was noninvasively estimated in the gastrocnemius muscle using 3 T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the fast-twitch metabolite carnosine. Youth athletes' muscle typology was compared to a discipline-specific elite athlete benchmark cohort (n = 87, ≥1050 IAAF points). Youth athletes were classified as matches if their muscle typology was within the range (mean ± 1SD) of the elite athletes for their discipline, otherwise classified as mismatches.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nFollow-up was on average 5.0 ± 3.6 years after the scan. The matching athletes achieved a significantly higher IAAF-score (987 ± 110 vs 915 ± 93 points, p = 0.011) compared to mismatching athletes, indicating better future performance if muscle typology at youth level matched with muscle typology of the elite benchmark competing in the same discipline. Of all matching athletes, 19% achieved an all-time best score above 1100 IAAF points, i.e. reaching international standards, compared to none with a mismatching muscle typology (p = 0.029).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThis prospective study shows for the first time that youth track-and-field athletes who train for a discipline that is deemed optimal based on their muscle typology, will attain a better performance at senior level, opening perspectives for talent identification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前的人才识别项目很难成功地识别年轻的田径人才。这项研究前瞻性地调查了慢速和快肌纤维的分布是否能预测长达12年的未来表现。方法自2010年以来,我们选取了64名优秀的青少年田径运动员,年龄为15.7±1.3岁,年龄范围为12 ~ 18岁。使用快速抽搐代谢物肌肽的3t质子磁共振波谱在腓肠肌中无创地估计其肌肉类型。将青年运动员的肌肉类型与特定学科的精英运动员基准队列进行比较(n = 87,≥1050 IAAF点)。青年运动员的肌肉类型在该学科优秀运动员的范围内(平均±1SD)为匹配,否则为不匹配。结果扫描后平均随访5.0±3.6年。与不匹配运动员相比,匹配运动员的国际田径联合会得分(987±110分vs 915±93分,p = 0.011)显著高于不匹配运动员,这表明如果青年水平的肌肉类型与同一学科的精英基准肌肉类型匹配,未来的表现会更好。在所有匹配的运动员中,19%的运动员获得了1100分以上的国际田联历史最高分,即达到国际标准,而肌肉类型不匹配的运动员则没有(p = 0.029)。结论本前瞻性研究首次表明,青少年田径运动员在肌肉类型被认为是最佳的训练项目中训练,将在高级水平上获得更好的表现,为人才识别开辟了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Talents on Track: Better Future Performance in Youth Track-and-Field Athletes with a Matching Muscle Typology.
PURPOSE Current talent identification programs struggle to successfully identify young track-and-field talents. This study prospectively investigated whether the distribution of slow and fast muscle fibers predicts future performance over up to 12 years. METHODS Since 2010, we included 64 talented youth athletes from selective track-and-field elite sport schools (age = 15.7 ± 1.3 years, range 12 to 18 years). Their muscle typology was noninvasively estimated in the gastrocnemius muscle using 3 T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the fast-twitch metabolite carnosine. Youth athletes' muscle typology was compared to a discipline-specific elite athlete benchmark cohort (n = 87, ≥1050 IAAF points). Youth athletes were classified as matches if their muscle typology was within the range (mean ± 1SD) of the elite athletes for their discipline, otherwise classified as mismatches. RESULTS Follow-up was on average 5.0 ± 3.6 years after the scan. The matching athletes achieved a significantly higher IAAF-score (987 ± 110 vs 915 ± 93 points, p = 0.011) compared to mismatching athletes, indicating better future performance if muscle typology at youth level matched with muscle typology of the elite benchmark competing in the same discipline. Of all matching athletes, 19% achieved an all-time best score above 1100 IAAF points, i.e. reaching international standards, compared to none with a mismatching muscle typology (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS This prospective study shows for the first time that youth track-and-field athletes who train for a discipline that is deemed optimal based on their muscle typology, will attain a better performance at senior level, opening perspectives for talent identification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信