Jonas Vandecauter,Kim Van Vossel,Freek Van de Casteele,Audrey Baguet,Tine Bex,Wim Derave,Eline Lievens
{"title":"田径天才:肌肉类型匹配的青少年田径运动员未来表现更好。","authors":"Jonas Vandecauter,Kim Van Vossel,Freek Van de Casteele,Audrey Baguet,Tine Bex,Wim Derave,Eline Lievens","doi":"10.1249/mss.0000000000003820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nCurrent talent identification programs struggle to successfully identify young track-and-field talents. This study prospectively investigated whether the distribution of slow and fast muscle fibers predicts future performance over up to 12 years.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nSince 2010, we included 64 talented youth athletes from selective track-and-field elite sport schools (age = 15.7 ± 1.3 years, range 12 to 18 years). Their muscle typology was noninvasively estimated in the gastrocnemius muscle using 3 T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the fast-twitch metabolite carnosine. Youth athletes' muscle typology was compared to a discipline-specific elite athlete benchmark cohort (n = 87, ≥1050 IAAF points). Youth athletes were classified as matches if their muscle typology was within the range (mean ± 1SD) of the elite athletes for their discipline, otherwise classified as mismatches.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFollow-up was on average 5.0 ± 3.6 years after the scan. The matching athletes achieved a significantly higher IAAF-score (987 ± 110 vs 915 ± 93 points, p = 0.011) compared to mismatching athletes, indicating better future performance if muscle typology at youth level matched with muscle typology of the elite benchmark competing in the same discipline. Of all matching athletes, 19% achieved an all-time best score above 1100 IAAF points, i.e. reaching international standards, compared to none with a mismatching muscle typology (p = 0.029).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis prospective study shows for the first time that youth track-and-field athletes who train for a discipline that is deemed optimal based on their muscle typology, will attain a better performance at senior level, opening perspectives for talent identification.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Talents on Track: Better Future Performance in Youth Track-and-Field Athletes with a Matching Muscle Typology.\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Vandecauter,Kim Van Vossel,Freek Van de Casteele,Audrey Baguet,Tine Bex,Wim Derave,Eline Lievens\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/mss.0000000000003820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nCurrent talent identification programs struggle to successfully identify young track-and-field talents. This study prospectively investigated whether the distribution of slow and fast muscle fibers predicts future performance over up to 12 years.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nSince 2010, we included 64 talented youth athletes from selective track-and-field elite sport schools (age = 15.7 ± 1.3 years, range 12 to 18 years). Their muscle typology was noninvasively estimated in the gastrocnemius muscle using 3 T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the fast-twitch metabolite carnosine. Youth athletes' muscle typology was compared to a discipline-specific elite athlete benchmark cohort (n = 87, ≥1050 IAAF points). Youth athletes were classified as matches if their muscle typology was within the range (mean ± 1SD) of the elite athletes for their discipline, otherwise classified as mismatches.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nFollow-up was on average 5.0 ± 3.6 years after the scan. The matching athletes achieved a significantly higher IAAF-score (987 ± 110 vs 915 ± 93 points, p = 0.011) compared to mismatching athletes, indicating better future performance if muscle typology at youth level matched with muscle typology of the elite benchmark competing in the same discipline. Of all matching athletes, 19% achieved an all-time best score above 1100 IAAF points, i.e. reaching international standards, compared to none with a mismatching muscle typology (p = 0.029).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThis prospective study shows for the first time that youth track-and-field athletes who train for a discipline that is deemed optimal based on their muscle typology, will attain a better performance at senior level, opening perspectives for talent identification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Talents on Track: Better Future Performance in Youth Track-and-Field Athletes with a Matching Muscle Typology.
PURPOSE
Current talent identification programs struggle to successfully identify young track-and-field talents. This study prospectively investigated whether the distribution of slow and fast muscle fibers predicts future performance over up to 12 years.
METHODS
Since 2010, we included 64 talented youth athletes from selective track-and-field elite sport schools (age = 15.7 ± 1.3 years, range 12 to 18 years). Their muscle typology was noninvasively estimated in the gastrocnemius muscle using 3 T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the fast-twitch metabolite carnosine. Youth athletes' muscle typology was compared to a discipline-specific elite athlete benchmark cohort (n = 87, ≥1050 IAAF points). Youth athletes were classified as matches if their muscle typology was within the range (mean ± 1SD) of the elite athletes for their discipline, otherwise classified as mismatches.
RESULTS
Follow-up was on average 5.0 ± 3.6 years after the scan. The matching athletes achieved a significantly higher IAAF-score (987 ± 110 vs 915 ± 93 points, p = 0.011) compared to mismatching athletes, indicating better future performance if muscle typology at youth level matched with muscle typology of the elite benchmark competing in the same discipline. Of all matching athletes, 19% achieved an all-time best score above 1100 IAAF points, i.e. reaching international standards, compared to none with a mismatching muscle typology (p = 0.029).
CONCLUSIONS
This prospective study shows for the first time that youth track-and-field athletes who train for a discipline that is deemed optimal based on their muscle typology, will attain a better performance at senior level, opening perspectives for talent identification.