{"title":"使用机器学习识别不同解剖部位的高危粘液表皮样癌患者的预后工具的开发。","authors":"Yun Lei, Wan-Shan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), typically arising in the salivary glands, has been documented in various anatomical locations. This study aimed to develop machine learning models for efficient prognosis prediction in patients with MEC across different anatomical sites and to create a novel tool for identifying high-risk patients in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study involving 6280 patients with MEC from diverse anatomical sites was conducted. COX regression analysis identified prognostic variables. Five machine learning models-Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Generalized Additive Model (GAM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM)-were constructed. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, recall, precision, and the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. However, the external validation was not performed. The best-performing model was developed into a prognostic tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GAM outperformed the other models, and a web-based tool was developed for identifying patients with varying prognostic risks across MEC cases from different anatomical locations, supporting clinical decision-making, personalizing therapeutic strategies based on clinical characteristics, ensuring tailored treatment schedules and optimizing resource allocation. Extension, age, pathological grade, clinical stage, and N-stage were the most significant variables in the final model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study established an online tool utilizing GAM to aid in identifying high-risk patients with MEC and enhancing prognostic accuracy in clinical practice. The anatomical site did not significantly influence survival outcomes, offering valuable insights into the shared pathogenesis of MEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a prognostic tool using machine learning to identify high-risk mucoepidermoid carcinoma patients across diverse anatomical sites.\",\"authors\":\"Yun Lei, Wan-Shan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), typically arising in the salivary glands, has been documented in various anatomical locations. This study aimed to develop machine learning models for efficient prognosis prediction in patients with MEC across different anatomical sites and to create a novel tool for identifying high-risk patients in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study involving 6280 patients with MEC from diverse anatomical sites was conducted. COX regression analysis identified prognostic variables. Five machine learning models-Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Generalized Additive Model (GAM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM)-were constructed. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, recall, precision, and the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. However, the external validation was not performed. The best-performing model was developed into a prognostic tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GAM outperformed the other models, and a web-based tool was developed for identifying patients with varying prognostic risks across MEC cases from different anatomical locations, supporting clinical decision-making, personalizing therapeutic strategies based on clinical characteristics, ensuring tailored treatment schedules and optimizing resource allocation. Extension, age, pathological grade, clinical stage, and N-stage were the most significant variables in the final model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study established an online tool utilizing GAM to aid in identifying high-risk patients with MEC and enhancing prognostic accuracy in clinical practice. The anatomical site did not significantly influence survival outcomes, offering valuable insights into the shared pathogenesis of MEC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102490\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102490\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of a prognostic tool using machine learning to identify high-risk mucoepidermoid carcinoma patients across diverse anatomical sites.
Objective: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), typically arising in the salivary glands, has been documented in various anatomical locations. This study aimed to develop machine learning models for efficient prognosis prediction in patients with MEC across different anatomical sites and to create a novel tool for identifying high-risk patients in clinical settings.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study involving 6280 patients with MEC from diverse anatomical sites was conducted. COX regression analysis identified prognostic variables. Five machine learning models-Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Generalized Additive Model (GAM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM)-were constructed. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, recall, precision, and the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. However, the external validation was not performed. The best-performing model was developed into a prognostic tool.
Results: The GAM outperformed the other models, and a web-based tool was developed for identifying patients with varying prognostic risks across MEC cases from different anatomical locations, supporting clinical decision-making, personalizing therapeutic strategies based on clinical characteristics, ensuring tailored treatment schedules and optimizing resource allocation. Extension, age, pathological grade, clinical stage, and N-stage were the most significant variables in the final model.
Conclusion: This study established an online tool utilizing GAM to aid in identifying high-risk patients with MEC and enhancing prognostic accuracy in clinical practice. The anatomical site did not significantly influence survival outcomes, offering valuable insights into the shared pathogenesis of MEC.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.