从那些生活过的人那里学习:一项探索生活经验共同设计在饮食失调研究方法中的参与的范围审查。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Jane Miskovic-Wheatley, Sabina Vatter, Shu Hwa Ong, Bronny Carroll, Stephen Touyz, Kristi Griffiths, Sarah Maguire
{"title":"从那些生活过的人那里学习:一项探索生活经验共同设计在饮食失调研究方法中的参与的范围审查。","authors":"Jane Miskovic-Wheatley,&nbsp;Sabina Vatter,&nbsp;Shu Hwa Ong,&nbsp;Bronny Carroll,&nbsp;Stephen Touyz,&nbsp;Kristi Griffiths,&nbsp;Sarah Maguire","doi":"10.1002/eat.24503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>There is a growing demand in health research and policy to meaningfully involve people with lived experience in co-creating research and treatment services, especially in eating disorders. Despite decades of research into risk, origin, onset, progression, and intervention, significant knowledge gaps remain. The aim of this review was to investigate evidence in the published literature of lived experience consideration and integration in eating disorder research methodology to date.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A scoping review methodology was used to review research across six databases. Lived experience was engaged in research ideation, search strategy, and analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The search generated over 6553 articles with 76 meeting the inclusion criteria. There has been growth of lived experience research inclusion over the past 5 years, especially in the United Kingdom and Australia. There was a wide range of lived experience engagement from one-off opportunistic engagement to full project integration and substantial variety in methodological reporting, including terminology, detail, and knowledge-sharing to advance the field. Researcher reflexivity reporting was rare and lived experience descriptions were sometimes limited by methodology (such as anonymous surveys), compromising analysis of representativeness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>While research incorporating lived experience is increasing, meaningful engagement varies widely, detailed methodological descriptions are lacking, and guidance on practical implementation is limited. Prioritizing time, resources, and trust-building in lived experience research and amplifying the value of seeking and reporting such efforts in grant calls and published research has the potential to address knowledge gaps and improve outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"58 10","pages":"1833-1883"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eat.24503","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning From Those Who Have Lived: A Scoping Review Exploring the Involvement of Lived Experience Co-Design in Eating Disorder Research Methodologies\",\"authors\":\"Jane Miskovic-Wheatley,&nbsp;Sabina Vatter,&nbsp;Shu Hwa Ong,&nbsp;Bronny Carroll,&nbsp;Stephen Touyz,&nbsp;Kristi Griffiths,&nbsp;Sarah Maguire\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eat.24503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is a growing demand in health research and policy to meaningfully involve people with lived experience in co-creating research and treatment services, especially in eating disorders. Despite decades of research into risk, origin, onset, progression, and intervention, significant knowledge gaps remain. The aim of this review was to investigate evidence in the published literature of lived experience consideration and integration in eating disorder research methodology to date.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>A scoping review methodology was used to review research across six databases. Lived experience was engaged in research ideation, search strategy, and analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The search generated over 6553 articles with 76 meeting the inclusion criteria. There has been growth of lived experience research inclusion over the past 5 years, especially in the United Kingdom and Australia. There was a wide range of lived experience engagement from one-off opportunistic engagement to full project integration and substantial variety in methodological reporting, including terminology, detail, and knowledge-sharing to advance the field. Researcher reflexivity reporting was rare and lived experience descriptions were sometimes limited by methodology (such as anonymous surveys), compromising analysis of representativeness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>While research incorporating lived experience is increasing, meaningful engagement varies widely, detailed methodological descriptions are lacking, and guidance on practical implementation is limited. Prioritizing time, resources, and trust-building in lived experience research and amplifying the value of seeking and reporting such efforts in grant calls and published research has the potential to address knowledge gaps and improve outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\"58 10\",\"pages\":\"1833-1883\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eat.24503\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24503\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24503","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:健康研究和政策越来越需要有生活经验的人有意义地参与共同创造研究和治疗服务,特别是在饮食失调方面。尽管对风险、起源、发病、进展和干预进行了数十年的研究,但仍存在重大的知识空白。本综述的目的是调查迄今为止饮食失调研究方法中生活经验考虑和整合的已发表文献中的证据。方法:采用范围审查方法对六个数据库的研究进行审查。生活经验从事研究构思,搜索策略和分析。结果:检索得到6553篇文章,其中76篇符合纳入标准。在过去的五年中,生活体验研究的包容性有所增长,特别是在英国和澳大利亚。有广泛的生活经验参与,从一次性的机会性参与到完整的项目整合,以及方法报告的实质性变化,包括术语,细节和知识共享,以推进该领域。研究者反身性报告是罕见的,生活经验描述有时受到方法(如匿名调查)的限制,损害了代表性的分析。讨论:虽然结合生活经验的研究越来越多,但有意义的参与差异很大,缺乏详细的方法描述,并且对实际实施的指导有限。在生活经验研究中优先考虑时间、资源和建立信任,并在资助呼吁和已发表的研究中扩大寻求和报告此类努力的价值,有可能解决知识差距并改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Learning From Those Who Have Lived: A Scoping Review Exploring the Involvement of Lived Experience Co-Design in Eating Disorder Research Methodologies

Learning From Those Who Have Lived: A Scoping Review Exploring the Involvement of Lived Experience Co-Design in Eating Disorder Research Methodologies

Objective

There is a growing demand in health research and policy to meaningfully involve people with lived experience in co-creating research and treatment services, especially in eating disorders. Despite decades of research into risk, origin, onset, progression, and intervention, significant knowledge gaps remain. The aim of this review was to investigate evidence in the published literature of lived experience consideration and integration in eating disorder research methodology to date.

Method

A scoping review methodology was used to review research across six databases. Lived experience was engaged in research ideation, search strategy, and analysis.

Results

The search generated over 6553 articles with 76 meeting the inclusion criteria. There has been growth of lived experience research inclusion over the past 5 years, especially in the United Kingdom and Australia. There was a wide range of lived experience engagement from one-off opportunistic engagement to full project integration and substantial variety in methodological reporting, including terminology, detail, and knowledge-sharing to advance the field. Researcher reflexivity reporting was rare and lived experience descriptions were sometimes limited by methodology (such as anonymous surveys), compromising analysis of representativeness.

Discussion

While research incorporating lived experience is increasing, meaningful engagement varies widely, detailed methodological descriptions are lacking, and guidance on practical implementation is limited. Prioritizing time, resources, and trust-building in lived experience research and amplifying the value of seeking and reporting such efforts in grant calls and published research has the potential to address knowledge gaps and improve outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信