青少年注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的社会概况:来自ABCD研究的证据

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Rosario Pintos Lobo , Julio A. Peraza , Taylor Salo , Alan Meca , Donisha D. Smith , Kathleen E. Feeney , Katherine M. Schmarder , Matthew T. Sutherland , Raul Gonzalez , Erica D. Musser , Angela R. Laird
{"title":"青少年注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的社会概况:来自ABCD研究的证据","authors":"Rosario Pintos Lobo ,&nbsp;Julio A. Peraza ,&nbsp;Taylor Salo ,&nbsp;Alan Meca ,&nbsp;Donisha D. Smith ,&nbsp;Kathleen E. Feeney ,&nbsp;Katherine M. Schmarder ,&nbsp;Matthew T. Sutherland ,&nbsp;Raul Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Erica D. Musser ,&nbsp;Angela R. Laird","doi":"10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social functioning difficulties among youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been examined behaviorally; however, limited research has investigated brain networks associated with social difficulties among youth with ADHD. A growing body of literature supports the utility of the NIMH’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework, which emphasizes broad neurobiological based dimensions, allowing for the integration of models of both neural circuitry and behavior when examining externalizing behaviors in youth. We hypothesized that an ADHD classification system based on social functioning would better predict real-world psychosocial and academic outcomes compared to traditional Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) nosology of ADHD presentations. First, using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, we identified four distinct profiles of youth with ADHD ranging from low social functioning to high social functioning. These social-data-derived profiles were linked to differential social challenges associated with caregiver income and mental health disorders. Next, our neuroimaging findings initially revealed differential patterns of functional connectivity across profiles involving attention-control, cingulo-opercular, sensorimotor networks. However, these connectivity differences were not consistently replicated, indicating that social functioning alone may not define neurobiologically distinct subgroups. Finally, in comparing our social functioning profiles to existing DSM-5 nosology with respect to real-world psychosocial outcomes, our social profiles demonstrated greater explanatory power for outcomes related to peer relationships, family conflict, and mental health. Overall, these findings emphasize the heterogeneity in social functioning among ADHD youth and suggest that while behavioral profiles are clinically meaningful, future work should integrate additional dimensions, such as executive functioning, to more precisely capture the neurobiological underpinnings of ADHD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49083,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101591"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social profiles among youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Evidence from the ABCD study\",\"authors\":\"Rosario Pintos Lobo ,&nbsp;Julio A. Peraza ,&nbsp;Taylor Salo ,&nbsp;Alan Meca ,&nbsp;Donisha D. Smith ,&nbsp;Kathleen E. Feeney ,&nbsp;Katherine M. Schmarder ,&nbsp;Matthew T. Sutherland ,&nbsp;Raul Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Erica D. Musser ,&nbsp;Angela R. Laird\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Social functioning difficulties among youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been examined behaviorally; however, limited research has investigated brain networks associated with social difficulties among youth with ADHD. A growing body of literature supports the utility of the NIMH’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework, which emphasizes broad neurobiological based dimensions, allowing for the integration of models of both neural circuitry and behavior when examining externalizing behaviors in youth. We hypothesized that an ADHD classification system based on social functioning would better predict real-world psychosocial and academic outcomes compared to traditional Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) nosology of ADHD presentations. First, using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, we identified four distinct profiles of youth with ADHD ranging from low social functioning to high social functioning. These social-data-derived profiles were linked to differential social challenges associated with caregiver income and mental health disorders. Next, our neuroimaging findings initially revealed differential patterns of functional connectivity across profiles involving attention-control, cingulo-opercular, sensorimotor networks. However, these connectivity differences were not consistently replicated, indicating that social functioning alone may not define neurobiologically distinct subgroups. Finally, in comparing our social functioning profiles to existing DSM-5 nosology with respect to real-world psychosocial outcomes, our social profiles demonstrated greater explanatory power for outcomes related to peer relationships, family conflict, and mental health. Overall, these findings emphasize the heterogeneity in social functioning among ADHD youth and suggest that while behavioral profiles are clinically meaningful, future work should integrate additional dimensions, such as executive functioning, to more precisely capture the neurobiological underpinnings of ADHD.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929325000866\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929325000866","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

青少年注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的社会功能障碍已被检查行为;然而,有限的研究调查了与多动症青少年社交困难相关的大脑网络。越来越多的文献支持NIMH研究领域标准(RDoC)框架的实用性,该框架强调广泛的神经生物学基础维度,允许在检查青少年外化行为时将神经回路和行为模型整合起来。我们假设,与传统的精神疾病诊断与统计手册(DSM-5) ADHD分类学相比,基于社会功能的ADHD分类系统可以更好地预测现实世界的社会心理和学业结果。首先,利用青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究的数据,我们确定了从低社会功能到高社会功能的四种不同的ADHD青少年特征。这些来自社会数据的档案与照顾者收入和精神健康障碍相关的不同社会挑战有关。接下来,我们的神经影像学发现最初揭示了不同的功能连接模式,包括注意控制、扣谷-眼、感觉运动网络。然而,这些连通性差异并没有被一致地复制,这表明社会功能本身可能无法定义神经生物学上不同的亚群。最后,在将我们的社会功能概况与现有的DSM-5关于现实社会心理结果的分类学进行比较时,我们的社会功能概况对与同伴关系、家庭冲突和心理健康相关的结果显示出更强的解释力。总的来说,这些发现强调了ADHD青少年社会功能的异质性,并表明虽然行为特征在临床上有意义,但未来的工作应该整合其他维度,如执行功能,以更准确地捕捉ADHD的神经生物学基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social profiles among youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Evidence from the ABCD study
Social functioning difficulties among youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been examined behaviorally; however, limited research has investigated brain networks associated with social difficulties among youth with ADHD. A growing body of literature supports the utility of the NIMH’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework, which emphasizes broad neurobiological based dimensions, allowing for the integration of models of both neural circuitry and behavior when examining externalizing behaviors in youth. We hypothesized that an ADHD classification system based on social functioning would better predict real-world psychosocial and academic outcomes compared to traditional Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) nosology of ADHD presentations. First, using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, we identified four distinct profiles of youth with ADHD ranging from low social functioning to high social functioning. These social-data-derived profiles were linked to differential social challenges associated with caregiver income and mental health disorders. Next, our neuroimaging findings initially revealed differential patterns of functional connectivity across profiles involving attention-control, cingulo-opercular, sensorimotor networks. However, these connectivity differences were not consistently replicated, indicating that social functioning alone may not define neurobiologically distinct subgroups. Finally, in comparing our social functioning profiles to existing DSM-5 nosology with respect to real-world psychosocial outcomes, our social profiles demonstrated greater explanatory power for outcomes related to peer relationships, family conflict, and mental health. Overall, these findings emphasize the heterogeneity in social functioning among ADHD youth and suggest that while behavioral profiles are clinically meaningful, future work should integrate additional dimensions, such as executive functioning, to more precisely capture the neurobiological underpinnings of ADHD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.60%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes theoretical and research papers on cognitive brain development, from infancy through childhood and adolescence and into adulthood. It covers neurocognitive development and neurocognitive processing in both typical and atypical development, including social and affective aspects. Appropriate methodologies for the journal include, but are not limited to, functional neuroimaging (fMRI and MEG), electrophysiology (EEG and ERP), NIRS and transcranial magnetic stimulation, as well as other basic neuroscience approaches using cellular and animal models that directly address cognitive brain development, patient studies, case studies, post-mortem studies and pharmacological studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信