老年康复背景下加拿大职业表现指标(COPM)的交叉可靠性:加拿大职业表现指标(COPM)在老年康复背景下的交叉可靠性。

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Dionne Plecht, Anouk van Luijk, Judith Hoek, Wilco P Achterberg, Margot W M de Waal
{"title":"老年康复背景下加拿大职业表现指标(COPM)的交叉可靠性:加拿大职业表现指标(COPM)在老年康复背景下的交叉可靠性。","authors":"Dionne Plecht, Anouk van Luijk, Judith Hoek, Wilco P Achterberg, Margot W M de Waal","doi":"10.1177/00084174251352333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is used by occupational therapists (OTs) to identify problems in the occupational performance of patients, and its use is currently expanding within geriatric rehabilitation (GR). However, due to the complexity of the target group concerns have been raised regarding consistency of administration between OTs. <b>Purpose.</b> To assess the interrater reliability of the COPM in routine GR practice. <b>Method.</b> In two GR wards with patients aged 65 years and older, two different OTs administered the COPM to the same patient. We calculated the overlap in prioritized occupational problems, as well as the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of the COPM-Performance and COPM-Satisfaction scores. <b>Findings.</b> Twenty-six participants, mean age 79 (SD 7.6) with largely orthopaedic and neurological diagnoses, were assessed twice within 2-5 days (mean 3, SD 0.9). We identified a total of 355 problems, mostly in the domain selfcare (<i>N</i> = 222). For the 112 prioritized problems, two OTs had a 65% overlap. ICC values for COPM-Performance and COPM-Satisfaction were 0.566 and 0.567, respectively. <b>Conclusion.</b> In GR, the COPM has moderate IRR and a moderate percentage of overlapping prioritized occupational performance problems. Therapists should be aware of the potential scoring problem within GR and should invest in training.</p>","PeriodicalId":49097,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","volume":" ","pages":"84174251352333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interrater Reliability of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Within Geriatric Rehabilitation: Fiabilité interévaluateurs de la Mesure canadienne du rendement occupationnel (MCRO) dans le contexte de la réadaptation gériatrique.\",\"authors\":\"Dionne Plecht, Anouk van Luijk, Judith Hoek, Wilco P Achterberg, Margot W M de Waal\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00084174251352333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background.</b> The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is used by occupational therapists (OTs) to identify problems in the occupational performance of patients, and its use is currently expanding within geriatric rehabilitation (GR). However, due to the complexity of the target group concerns have been raised regarding consistency of administration between OTs. <b>Purpose.</b> To assess the interrater reliability of the COPM in routine GR practice. <b>Method.</b> In two GR wards with patients aged 65 years and older, two different OTs administered the COPM to the same patient. We calculated the overlap in prioritized occupational problems, as well as the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of the COPM-Performance and COPM-Satisfaction scores. <b>Findings.</b> Twenty-six participants, mean age 79 (SD 7.6) with largely orthopaedic and neurological diagnoses, were assessed twice within 2-5 days (mean 3, SD 0.9). We identified a total of 355 problems, mostly in the domain selfcare (<i>N</i> = 222). For the 112 prioritized problems, two OTs had a 65% overlap. ICC values for COPM-Performance and COPM-Satisfaction were 0.566 and 0.567, respectively. <b>Conclusion.</b> In GR, the COPM has moderate IRR and a moderate percentage of overlapping prioritized occupational performance problems. Therapists should be aware of the potential scoring problem within GR and should invest in training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"84174251352333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174251352333\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174251352333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。加拿大职业表现测量(COPM)被职业治疗师(OTs)用于识别患者职业表现中的问题,其使用目前正在老年康复(GR)中扩大。但是,由于目标群体的复杂性,已引起了对各组织之间行政管理一致性的关注。目的。评估COPM在常规GR实践中的互译器可靠性。方法。在两个年龄在65岁及以上的患者的GR病房中,两个不同的门诊医生对同一患者使用COPM。我们计算了优先职业问题的重叠,以及copm绩效和copm满意度得分的类内相关系数(ICC)。发现。26名参与者,平均年龄79岁(SD 7.6),主要是骨科和神经学诊断,在2-5天内评估两次(平均3天,SD 0.9)。我们总共发现了355个问题,大多数在自我护理领域(N = 222)。对于112个优先问题,两个ot有65%的重叠。copm绩效和copm满意度的ICC值分别为0.566和0.567。结论。在GR中,COPM具有中等的IRR和中等比例的重叠优先职业绩效问题。治疗师应该意识到GR中潜在的评分问题,并应该投资于培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interrater Reliability of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Within Geriatric Rehabilitation: Fiabilité interévaluateurs de la Mesure canadienne du rendement occupationnel (MCRO) dans le contexte de la réadaptation gériatrique.

Background. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is used by occupational therapists (OTs) to identify problems in the occupational performance of patients, and its use is currently expanding within geriatric rehabilitation (GR). However, due to the complexity of the target group concerns have been raised regarding consistency of administration between OTs. Purpose. To assess the interrater reliability of the COPM in routine GR practice. Method. In two GR wards with patients aged 65 years and older, two different OTs administered the COPM to the same patient. We calculated the overlap in prioritized occupational problems, as well as the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of the COPM-Performance and COPM-Satisfaction scores. Findings. Twenty-six participants, mean age 79 (SD 7.6) with largely orthopaedic and neurological diagnoses, were assessed twice within 2-5 days (mean 3, SD 0.9). We identified a total of 355 problems, mostly in the domain selfcare (N = 222). For the 112 prioritized problems, two OTs had a 65% overlap. ICC values for COPM-Performance and COPM-Satisfaction were 0.566 and 0.567, respectively. Conclusion. In GR, the COPM has moderate IRR and a moderate percentage of overlapping prioritized occupational performance problems. Therapists should be aware of the potential scoring problem within GR and should invest in training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy was first published in September 1933. Since that time, it has fostered advancement and growth in occupational therapy scholarship. The mission of the journal is to provide a forum for leading-edge occupational therapy scholarship that advances theory, practice, research, and policy. The vision is to be a high-quality scholarly journal that is at the forefront of the science of occupational therapy and a destination journal for the top scholars in the field, globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信