知识的悖论:为什么医学生知道的多却理解的少。

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Science Educator Pub Date : 2025-04-14 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s40670-025-02379-8
Heidi L Lujan, Stephen E DiCarlo
{"title":"知识的悖论:为什么医学生知道的多却理解的少。","authors":"Heidi L Lujan, Stephen E DiCarlo","doi":"10.1007/s40670-025-02379-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical education faces a paradox: despite unprecedented access to information, many students struggle to apply their knowledge to complex clinical scenarios. This paradox stems from an educational system that prioritizes rote memorization and exam performance over critical thinking and conceptual understanding. Information overload, protocol-driven learning, and exam-focused curricula contribute to superficial learning, leaving students underprepared for real-world practice. Additionally, diminishing emphasis on foundational sciences and inadequate time for reflection exacerbate this issue. To address these concerns, medical education must shift toward fostering deep learning, integrating basic and clinical sciences, and prioritizing active, inquiry-driven teaching methods to prepare adaptable, thoughtful clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"35 3","pages":"1761-1766"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Paradox of Knowledge: Why Medical Students Know More But Understand Less.\",\"authors\":\"Heidi L Lujan, Stephen E DiCarlo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40670-025-02379-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Medical education faces a paradox: despite unprecedented access to information, many students struggle to apply their knowledge to complex clinical scenarios. This paradox stems from an educational system that prioritizes rote memorization and exam performance over critical thinking and conceptual understanding. Information overload, protocol-driven learning, and exam-focused curricula contribute to superficial learning, leaving students underprepared for real-world practice. Additionally, diminishing emphasis on foundational sciences and inadequate time for reflection exacerbate this issue. To address these concerns, medical education must shift toward fostering deep learning, integrating basic and clinical sciences, and prioritizing active, inquiry-driven teaching methods to prepare adaptable, thoughtful clinicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Educator\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"1761-1766\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12228860/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02379-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02379-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学教育面临着一个悖论:尽管获得了前所未有的信息,但许多学生很难将他们的知识应用到复杂的临床场景中。这种矛盾源于一个教育系统,它优先考虑死记硬背和考试成绩,而不是批判性思维和概念理解。信息超载、协议驱动的学习和以考试为中心的课程导致肤浅的学习,使学生对现实世界的实践准备不足。此外,对基础科学的重视程度降低和反思时间不足加剧了这一问题。为了解决这些问题,医学教育必须转向培养深度学习,整合基础科学和临床科学,并优先考虑积极的、探究驱动的教学方法,以培养适应性强、有思想的临床医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Paradox of Knowledge: Why Medical Students Know More But Understand Less.

Medical education faces a paradox: despite unprecedented access to information, many students struggle to apply their knowledge to complex clinical scenarios. This paradox stems from an educational system that prioritizes rote memorization and exam performance over critical thinking and conceptual understanding. Information overload, protocol-driven learning, and exam-focused curricula contribute to superficial learning, leaving students underprepared for real-world practice. Additionally, diminishing emphasis on foundational sciences and inadequate time for reflection exacerbate this issue. To address these concerns, medical education must shift toward fostering deep learning, integrating basic and clinical sciences, and prioritizing active, inquiry-driven teaching methods to prepare adaptable, thoughtful clinicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Educator
Medical Science Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信