以情绪发展为基础的智障及行为关注人士干预计划的结果。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Allan Skelly, Jade Wigham, Mark Hudson
{"title":"以情绪发展为基础的智障及行为关注人士干预计划的结果。","authors":"Allan Skelly, Jade Wigham, Mark Hudson","doi":"10.1111/jir.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper examines clinical outcomes of an approach to referrals for concerns about severe behavioural distress in people with intellectual disabilities (ID) that is based on the concepts of emotional development (EDev) and attachment. Due to research and clinical experiences suggesting that positive behaviour support (PBS) may have limited long-term impact, an alternative approach is proposed, which focuses on relational factors and emotional skills already held by carers.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We report the process and outcomes of a brief standardised assessment using the Scale of Emotional Development-Short (SED-S) which then informed an attachment-based workshop. Outcomes were measured by way of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales-Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD) administered at (a) assessment, (b) following 1-2 intervention workshops and (c) at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly fewer sessions and hours of clinical time were required for the EDev intervention than the prior PBS interventions. Results demonstrated significant improvements from assessment to post-intervention, which were maintained 6 months later. Almost half (48%) of the participants were referred while in unsettled accommodation arrangements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides initial evidence supporting an approach that shows promise as an alternative to existing models of care based upon applied behaviour analysis. Future well-controlled studies across multiple sites are needed, but if these findings are replicated, the priority for intervention may shift from reduction in behavioural risks to robust care relationships which meet the person's emotional needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of an Intervention Programme for People With Intellectual Disabilities and Behavioural Concerns Based on Emotional Development.\",\"authors\":\"Allan Skelly, Jade Wigham, Mark Hudson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper examines clinical outcomes of an approach to referrals for concerns about severe behavioural distress in people with intellectual disabilities (ID) that is based on the concepts of emotional development (EDev) and attachment. Due to research and clinical experiences suggesting that positive behaviour support (PBS) may have limited long-term impact, an alternative approach is proposed, which focuses on relational factors and emotional skills already held by carers.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We report the process and outcomes of a brief standardised assessment using the Scale of Emotional Development-Short (SED-S) which then informed an attachment-based workshop. Outcomes were measured by way of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales-Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD) administered at (a) assessment, (b) following 1-2 intervention workshops and (c) at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly fewer sessions and hours of clinical time were required for the EDev intervention than the prior PBS interventions. Results demonstrated significant improvements from assessment to post-intervention, which were maintained 6 months later. Almost half (48%) of the participants were referred while in unsettled accommodation arrangements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides initial evidence supporting an approach that shows promise as an alternative to existing models of care based upon applied behaviour analysis. Future well-controlled studies across multiple sites are needed, but if these findings are replicated, the priority for intervention may shift from reduction in behavioural risks to robust care relationships which meet the person's emotional needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本文研究了一种基于情感发展(EDev)和依恋概念的智障人士(ID)严重行为困扰转诊方法的临床结果。由于研究和临床经验表明,积极行为支持(PBS)可能具有有限的长期影响,因此提出了一种替代方法,该方法侧重于护理人员已经掌握的关系因素和情感技能。方法:我们报告使用情感发展量表(SED-S)进行简短标准化评估的过程和结果,然后通知一个基于依恋的研讨会。结果通过国家健康结果量表-学习障碍(HoNOS-LD)进行测量(a)评估,(b) 1-2次干预讲习班和(c) 6个月随访。结果:与先前的PBS干预相比,EDev干预所需的疗程和临床时间明显减少。结果显示,从评估到干预后有显著改善,并在6个月后保持。几乎一半(48%)的参与者在未确定的住宿安排中被转介。结论:这项研究提供了初步证据,支持一种基于应用行为分析的现有护理模式的替代方法。未来需要在多个地点进行对照良好的研究,但如果这些发现被复制,干预的重点可能会从减少行为风险转向满足个人情感需求的健全护理关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of an Intervention Programme for People With Intellectual Disabilities and Behavioural Concerns Based on Emotional Development.

Background: This paper examines clinical outcomes of an approach to referrals for concerns about severe behavioural distress in people with intellectual disabilities (ID) that is based on the concepts of emotional development (EDev) and attachment. Due to research and clinical experiences suggesting that positive behaviour support (PBS) may have limited long-term impact, an alternative approach is proposed, which focuses on relational factors and emotional skills already held by carers.

Methodology: We report the process and outcomes of a brief standardised assessment using the Scale of Emotional Development-Short (SED-S) which then informed an attachment-based workshop. Outcomes were measured by way of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales-Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD) administered at (a) assessment, (b) following 1-2 intervention workshops and (c) at 6-month follow-up.

Results: Significantly fewer sessions and hours of clinical time were required for the EDev intervention than the prior PBS interventions. Results demonstrated significant improvements from assessment to post-intervention, which were maintained 6 months later. Almost half (48%) of the participants were referred while in unsettled accommodation arrangements.

Conclusions: This study provides initial evidence supporting an approach that shows promise as an alternative to existing models of care based upon applied behaviour analysis. Future well-controlled studies across multiple sites are needed, but if these findings are replicated, the priority for intervention may shift from reduction in behavioural risks to robust care relationships which meet the person's emotional needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信