权衡:临床医生和患者对饮食失调治疗中预期体重讨论的观点。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Agatha A. Laboe, Ava Heyrman, Siena Vendlinski, Molly F. Steinhoff, Sophia Kreckler, Caitlyn Ruud, Kate Walsh, Daniel W. Grupe, James J. Li, Katherine Schaumberg
{"title":"权衡:临床医生和患者对饮食失调治疗中预期体重讨论的观点。","authors":"Agatha A. Laboe,&nbsp;Ava Heyrman,&nbsp;Siena Vendlinski,&nbsp;Molly F. Steinhoff,&nbsp;Sophia Kreckler,&nbsp;Caitlyn Ruud,&nbsp;Kate Walsh,&nbsp;Daniel W. Grupe,&nbsp;James J. Li,&nbsp;Katherine Schaumberg","doi":"10.1002/eat.24501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Clinicians often determine an “expected body weight” (EBW) for patients who have lost weight due to an eating disorder (ED). However, there is inconsistent guidance and limited empirical research on when, how, and why to discuss EBWs with patients. This study explores clinician and patient perspectives on discussions of EBWs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 multidisciplinary ED clinicians and 16 individuals with outpatient ED treatment experience in the past 6 months. Clinicians shared their experiences with and rationales for sharing EBWs with patients and patients' family members. Patients shared their experiences of being informed about their EBWs, factors influencing their comfort level discussing EBWs with clinicians, and perceived impact of these discussions on their recovery. Interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis with a critical realist lens.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Clinician and patient perspectives aligned regarding when, how, and why to hold these discussions. Both groups emphasized that these discussions should occur after patients have demonstrated engagement with recovery and underscored the importance of framing the EBW as one aspect of a holistic recovery. Additionally, clinicians and patients highlighted the potential therapeutic benefits of these discussions, while also acknowledging challenges relating to parental involvement and weight bias.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings suggest that when discussions of EBWs are approached intentionally—accounting for timing, framing, and individual patient needs—clinicians and patients see potential therapeutic benefit. Future research can focus on developing evidence-based guidelines for sharing EBWs, addressing patient willingness to be informed of their EBW, weight bias, and parental involvement.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"58 10","pages":"1957-1969"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weighing in: Clinician and Patient Perspectives on Discussions of Expected Body Weights in Eating Disorder Treatment\",\"authors\":\"Agatha A. Laboe,&nbsp;Ava Heyrman,&nbsp;Siena Vendlinski,&nbsp;Molly F. Steinhoff,&nbsp;Sophia Kreckler,&nbsp;Caitlyn Ruud,&nbsp;Kate Walsh,&nbsp;Daniel W. Grupe,&nbsp;James J. Li,&nbsp;Katherine Schaumberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eat.24501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clinicians often determine an “expected body weight” (EBW) for patients who have lost weight due to an eating disorder (ED). However, there is inconsistent guidance and limited empirical research on when, how, and why to discuss EBWs with patients. This study explores clinician and patient perspectives on discussions of EBWs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 multidisciplinary ED clinicians and 16 individuals with outpatient ED treatment experience in the past 6 months. Clinicians shared their experiences with and rationales for sharing EBWs with patients and patients' family members. Patients shared their experiences of being informed about their EBWs, factors influencing their comfort level discussing EBWs with clinicians, and perceived impact of these discussions on their recovery. Interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis with a critical realist lens.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clinician and patient perspectives aligned regarding when, how, and why to hold these discussions. Both groups emphasized that these discussions should occur after patients have demonstrated engagement with recovery and underscored the importance of framing the EBW as one aspect of a holistic recovery. Additionally, clinicians and patients highlighted the potential therapeutic benefits of these discussions, while also acknowledging challenges relating to parental involvement and weight bias.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings suggest that when discussions of EBWs are approached intentionally—accounting for timing, framing, and individual patient needs—clinicians and patients see potential therapeutic benefit. Future research can focus on developing evidence-based guidelines for sharing EBWs, addressing patient willingness to be informed of their EBW, weight bias, and parental involvement.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\"58 10\",\"pages\":\"1957-1969\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24501\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24501","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:临床医生经常为因饮食失调(ED)而体重减轻的患者确定“预期体重”(EBW)。然而,在何时、如何以及为什么与患者讨论ebw方面,指导意见并不一致,实证研究也很有限。本研究探讨临床医生和患者对EBWs讨论的看法。方法:对24名多学科急诊科临床医生和16名近6个月有门诊急诊科治疗经验的患者进行半结构化访谈。临床医生分享了他们与患者和患者家属分享ebw的经验和理由。患者分享了他们被告知他们的ebw的经历,影响他们与临床医生讨论ebw舒适度的因素,以及这些讨论对他们康复的影响。访谈分析采用反身性主题分析与批判现实主义的镜头。结果:临床医生和患者对何时、如何以及为什么进行这些讨论的观点一致。两个小组都强调,这些讨论应该在患者表现出对康复的参与之后进行,并强调将EBW作为整体康复的一个方面的重要性。此外,临床医生和患者强调了这些讨论的潜在治疗益处,同时也承认与父母参与和体重偏见有关的挑战。讨论:研究结果表明,当有意识地讨论ebw时——考虑到时间、框架和患者个体需求——临床医生和患者都看到了潜在的治疗益处。未来的研究可以集中在制定基于证据的指导方针,以分享EBW,解决患者是否愿意被告知他们的EBW,体重偏差,以及父母的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Weighing in: Clinician and Patient Perspectives on Discussions of Expected Body Weights in Eating Disorder Treatment

Weighing in: Clinician and Patient Perspectives on Discussions of Expected Body Weights in Eating Disorder Treatment

Objective

Clinicians often determine an “expected body weight” (EBW) for patients who have lost weight due to an eating disorder (ED). However, there is inconsistent guidance and limited empirical research on when, how, and why to discuss EBWs with patients. This study explores clinician and patient perspectives on discussions of EBWs.

Method

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 multidisciplinary ED clinicians and 16 individuals with outpatient ED treatment experience in the past 6 months. Clinicians shared their experiences with and rationales for sharing EBWs with patients and patients' family members. Patients shared their experiences of being informed about their EBWs, factors influencing their comfort level discussing EBWs with clinicians, and perceived impact of these discussions on their recovery. Interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis with a critical realist lens.

Results

Clinician and patient perspectives aligned regarding when, how, and why to hold these discussions. Both groups emphasized that these discussions should occur after patients have demonstrated engagement with recovery and underscored the importance of framing the EBW as one aspect of a holistic recovery. Additionally, clinicians and patients highlighted the potential therapeutic benefits of these discussions, while also acknowledging challenges relating to parental involvement and weight bias.

Discussion

Findings suggest that when discussions of EBWs are approached intentionally—accounting for timing, framing, and individual patient needs—clinicians and patients see potential therapeutic benefit. Future research can focus on developing evidence-based guidelines for sharing EBWs, addressing patient willingness to be informed of their EBW, weight bias, and parental involvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信