更新通知EFSA的有意添加到食品或饲料中的合格安全推定(QPS)推荐微生物制剂清单22:通知EFSA的分类单位的适用性,直到2025年3月

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Ana Allende, Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez, Valeria Bortolaia, Sara Bover-Cid, Alessandra De Cesare, Wietske Dohmen, Laurent Guillier, Liesbeth Jacxsens, Maarten Nauta, Lapo Mughini-Gras, Jakob Ottoson, Luisa Peixe, Fernando Perez-Rodriguez, Panagiotis Skandamis, Elisabetta Suffredini, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez, Miguel Prieto Maradona, Amparo Querol, Lolke Sijtsma, Juan Evaristo Suarez, Marianne Chemaly, Ingvar Sundh, Fulvio Barizzone, Justine Dastouet, Nadya Doyle, Sandra Correia, Lieve Herman
{"title":"更新通知EFSA的有意添加到食品或饲料中的合格安全推定(QPS)推荐微生物制剂清单22:通知EFSA的分类单位的适用性,直到2025年3月","authors":"EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ),&nbsp;Ana Allende,&nbsp;Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez,&nbsp;Valeria Bortolaia,&nbsp;Sara Bover-Cid,&nbsp;Alessandra De Cesare,&nbsp;Wietske Dohmen,&nbsp;Laurent Guillier,&nbsp;Liesbeth Jacxsens,&nbsp;Maarten Nauta,&nbsp;Lapo Mughini-Gras,&nbsp;Jakob Ottoson,&nbsp;Luisa Peixe,&nbsp;Fernando Perez-Rodriguez,&nbsp;Panagiotis Skandamis,&nbsp;Elisabetta Suffredini,&nbsp;Pier Sandro Cocconcelli,&nbsp;Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez,&nbsp;Miguel Prieto Maradona,&nbsp;Amparo Querol,&nbsp;Lolke Sijtsma,&nbsp;Juan Evaristo Suarez,&nbsp;Marianne Chemaly,&nbsp;Ingvar Sundh,&nbsp;Fulvio Barizzone,&nbsp;Justine Dastouet,&nbsp;Nadya Doyle,&nbsp;Sandra Correia,&nbsp;Lieve Herman","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) process was developed to assess the safety of microorganisms used in food and feed chains. During the period covered by this Statement, no new information warranted changes to the status of previously recommended QPS taxonomic units. The QPS list was updated to verify the correctness of the names and the completeness of synonyms. Of the 47 microorganisms notified to EFSA between October 2024 and March 2025 (25 as feed additives, 7 as food enzymes or additives, 6 as novel foods, 8 as plant protection products and 1 as food contact materials), 41 were not evaluated. These latter included 11 filamentous fungi, 4 <i>Escherichia coli</i> and 1 <i>Streptomyces</i> spp. (all excluded from the QPS evaluation), and 25 already on the QPS list. Two of the other six notifications, <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> and <i>Ensifer adhaerens</i>, had been previously assessed. The remaining four were assessed for a possible QPS status. <i>Bacillus sonorensis</i> is recommended for the QPS list with the qualifications: ‘absence of bacitracin production ability’ and ‘absence of toxigenic activity’. <i>Vibrio natriegens</i> is also recommended but for ‘production purposes only’. <i>Corynebacterium stationis</i> is not recommended due to a limited body of knowledge on its occurrence in the food and feed chain and possible safety concerns in relation to human and animal health. <i>Papilotrema terrestris</i> is not recommended due to a limited body of knowledge. Furthermore, <i>Lactobacillus paragasseri</i> (formerly included in <i>Lactobacillus gasseri</i>) is recommended for the QPS list. The QPS approach can also be followed if the qualifications for QPS are met due to the removal of a gene(s) of concern, by means of genetic modification. For QPS yeasts, used as active agents (viable cells), the qualification ‘for production purposes only’ was added for when they are used as production strains or as biomass (non-viable cells).</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9510","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 22: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2025\",\"authors\":\"EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ),&nbsp;Ana Allende,&nbsp;Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez,&nbsp;Valeria Bortolaia,&nbsp;Sara Bover-Cid,&nbsp;Alessandra De Cesare,&nbsp;Wietske Dohmen,&nbsp;Laurent Guillier,&nbsp;Liesbeth Jacxsens,&nbsp;Maarten Nauta,&nbsp;Lapo Mughini-Gras,&nbsp;Jakob Ottoson,&nbsp;Luisa Peixe,&nbsp;Fernando Perez-Rodriguez,&nbsp;Panagiotis Skandamis,&nbsp;Elisabetta Suffredini,&nbsp;Pier Sandro Cocconcelli,&nbsp;Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez,&nbsp;Miguel Prieto Maradona,&nbsp;Amparo Querol,&nbsp;Lolke Sijtsma,&nbsp;Juan Evaristo Suarez,&nbsp;Marianne Chemaly,&nbsp;Ingvar Sundh,&nbsp;Fulvio Barizzone,&nbsp;Justine Dastouet,&nbsp;Nadya Doyle,&nbsp;Sandra Correia,&nbsp;Lieve Herman\",\"doi\":\"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) process was developed to assess the safety of microorganisms used in food and feed chains. During the period covered by this Statement, no new information warranted changes to the status of previously recommended QPS taxonomic units. The QPS list was updated to verify the correctness of the names and the completeness of synonyms. Of the 47 microorganisms notified to EFSA between October 2024 and March 2025 (25 as feed additives, 7 as food enzymes or additives, 6 as novel foods, 8 as plant protection products and 1 as food contact materials), 41 were not evaluated. These latter included 11 filamentous fungi, 4 <i>Escherichia coli</i> and 1 <i>Streptomyces</i> spp. (all excluded from the QPS evaluation), and 25 already on the QPS list. Two of the other six notifications, <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> and <i>Ensifer adhaerens</i>, had been previously assessed. The remaining four were assessed for a possible QPS status. <i>Bacillus sonorensis</i> is recommended for the QPS list with the qualifications: ‘absence of bacitracin production ability’ and ‘absence of toxigenic activity’. <i>Vibrio natriegens</i> is also recommended but for ‘production purposes only’. <i>Corynebacterium stationis</i> is not recommended due to a limited body of knowledge on its occurrence in the food and feed chain and possible safety concerns in relation to human and animal health. <i>Papilotrema terrestris</i> is not recommended due to a limited body of knowledge. Furthermore, <i>Lactobacillus paragasseri</i> (formerly included in <i>Lactobacillus gasseri</i>) is recommended for the QPS list. The QPS approach can also be followed if the qualifications for QPS are met due to the removal of a gene(s) of concern, by means of genetic modification. For QPS yeasts, used as active agents (viable cells), the qualification ‘for production purposes only’ was added for when they are used as production strains or as biomass (non-viable cells).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9510\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9510\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9510","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

制定了安全合格推定(QPS)流程,以评估食品和饲料链中使用的微生物的安全性。在本声明所述期间,没有新的信息要求改变先前推荐的QPS分类单位的状态。更新了QPS列表,以验证名称的正确性和同义词的完整性。在2024年10月至2025年3月期间向欧洲食品安全局通报的47种微生物中(25种作为饲料添加剂,7种作为食品酶或添加剂,6种作为新型食品,8种作为植物保护产品,1种作为食品接触材料),41种未进行评估。其中丝状真菌11种,大肠杆菌4种,链霉菌1种(均排除在QPS评价之外),目前已列入QPS名录的有25种。其他六份通报中的两份,苏云金芽孢杆菌和阿赫宁芽孢杆菌,先前已进行了评估。其余4例被评估为可能的QPS状态。索诺芽孢杆菌被推荐为QPS名单,其资格条件为:“缺乏杆菌肽生产能力”和“缺乏毒素活性”。也建议使用营养弧菌,但“仅用于生产目的”。由于对棒状芽孢杆菌在食品和饲料链中存在的知识有限,以及可能与人类和动物健康有关的安全问题,不建议在棒状芽孢杆菌驻点。由于知识有限,不推荐使用地乳头状乳突。此外,副嗜酸乳杆菌(以前包括在干酪乳杆菌中)被推荐为QPS列表。如果QPS的资格是由于通过基因修饰去除了一个或多个相关基因而满足的,也可以采用QPS方法。对于用作活性剂(活细胞)的QPS酵母,当它们用作生产菌株或生物质(非活细胞)时,添加了“仅用于生产目的”的限定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 22: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2025

The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) process was developed to assess the safety of microorganisms used in food and feed chains. During the period covered by this Statement, no new information warranted changes to the status of previously recommended QPS taxonomic units. The QPS list was updated to verify the correctness of the names and the completeness of synonyms. Of the 47 microorganisms notified to EFSA between October 2024 and March 2025 (25 as feed additives, 7 as food enzymes or additives, 6 as novel foods, 8 as plant protection products and 1 as food contact materials), 41 were not evaluated. These latter included 11 filamentous fungi, 4 Escherichia coli and 1 Streptomyces spp. (all excluded from the QPS evaluation), and 25 already on the QPS list. Two of the other six notifications, Bacillus thuringiensis and Ensifer adhaerens, had been previously assessed. The remaining four were assessed for a possible QPS status. Bacillus sonorensis is recommended for the QPS list with the qualifications: ‘absence of bacitracin production ability’ and ‘absence of toxigenic activity’. Vibrio natriegens is also recommended but for ‘production purposes only’. Corynebacterium stationis is not recommended due to a limited body of knowledge on its occurrence in the food and feed chain and possible safety concerns in relation to human and animal health. Papilotrema terrestris is not recommended due to a limited body of knowledge. Furthermore, Lactobacillus paragasseri (formerly included in Lactobacillus gasseri) is recommended for the QPS list. The QPS approach can also be followed if the qualifications for QPS are met due to the removal of a gene(s) of concern, by means of genetic modification. For QPS yeasts, used as active agents (viable cells), the qualification ‘for production purposes only’ was added for when they are used as production strains or as biomass (non-viable cells).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信