人体工程学设计中数字人体建模中的姿势预测模型:系统综述

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Mengjie Zhang, Arne Nieuwenhuys, Yanxin Zhang
{"title":"人体工程学设计中数字人体建模中的姿势预测模型:系统综述","authors":"Mengjie Zhang,&nbsp;Arne Nieuwenhuys,&nbsp;Yanxin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2025.104391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Posture prediction models have been widely used to support ergonomic design. This systematic review critically assessed the development, validation, and applications of posture prediction models in Digital Human Modeling (DHM). Following PRISMA guidelines, 24 studies were included from a search across nine academic databases, categorized into data-driven models (n = 12) and optimization-based models (n = 12). Data-driven models, particularly those employing neural network regression and artificial neural networks, demonstrated strong predictive accuracy and adaptability, but often lacked generalizability due to data imbalance and limited participant/task diversity. Optimization-based models, using algorithms such as gradient descent and genetic algorithms, showed high biomechanical fidelity but computational challenges and limited computer-aided design (CAD) integration. While a few models have been integrated with existing CAD software such as JACK and Santos™, most lacked ergonomic evaluation and real-time usability. Limitations identified include insufficient diverse datasets, computational inefficiencies, and limited validation in real-world conditions. Future research should prioritize model development supported by scalable motion data using computer vision-based technologies and hybrid strategies that combine learning-based inference with biomechanical simulation, offering a promising path toward achieving both accuracy and physiological realism in posture prediction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 104391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posture prediction models in digital human modeling for ergonomic design: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Mengjie Zhang,&nbsp;Arne Nieuwenhuys,&nbsp;Yanxin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medengphy.2025.104391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Posture prediction models have been widely used to support ergonomic design. This systematic review critically assessed the development, validation, and applications of posture prediction models in Digital Human Modeling (DHM). Following PRISMA guidelines, 24 studies were included from a search across nine academic databases, categorized into data-driven models (n = 12) and optimization-based models (n = 12). Data-driven models, particularly those employing neural network regression and artificial neural networks, demonstrated strong predictive accuracy and adaptability, but often lacked generalizability due to data imbalance and limited participant/task diversity. Optimization-based models, using algorithms such as gradient descent and genetic algorithms, showed high biomechanical fidelity but computational challenges and limited computer-aided design (CAD) integration. While a few models have been integrated with existing CAD software such as JACK and Santos™, most lacked ergonomic evaluation and real-time usability. Limitations identified include insufficient diverse datasets, computational inefficiencies, and limited validation in real-world conditions. Future research should prioritize model development supported by scalable motion data using computer vision-based technologies and hybrid strategies that combine learning-based inference with biomechanical simulation, offering a promising path toward achieving both accuracy and physiological realism in posture prediction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104391\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453325001109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453325001109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

姿势预测模型已被广泛用于支持人体工程学设计。这篇系统综述批判性地评估了数字人体建模(DHM)中姿势预测模型的发展、验证和应用。根据PRISMA指南,从9个学术数据库中检索了24项研究,分为数据驱动模型(n = 12)和优化模型(n = 12)。数据驱动模型,特别是采用神经网络回归和人工神经网络的模型,具有较强的预测准确性和适应性,但由于数据不平衡和参与者/任务多样性有限,往往缺乏泛化能力。基于优化的模型,使用梯度下降和遗传算法等算法,显示出较高的生物力学保真度,但计算挑战和有限的计算机辅助设计(CAD)集成。虽然一些模型已经与现有的CAD软件(如JACK和Santos™)集成,但大多数模型缺乏人体工程学评估和实时可用性。确定的限制包括数据集多样性不足、计算效率低下以及在现实条件下的验证有限。未来的研究应该优先考虑使用基于计算机视觉的技术和混合策略来支持可扩展的运动数据,将基于学习的推理与生物力学模拟相结合,为实现姿势预测的准确性和生理真实性提供一条有希望的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Posture prediction models in digital human modeling for ergonomic design: A systematic review
Posture prediction models have been widely used to support ergonomic design. This systematic review critically assessed the development, validation, and applications of posture prediction models in Digital Human Modeling (DHM). Following PRISMA guidelines, 24 studies were included from a search across nine academic databases, categorized into data-driven models (n = 12) and optimization-based models (n = 12). Data-driven models, particularly those employing neural network regression and artificial neural networks, demonstrated strong predictive accuracy and adaptability, but often lacked generalizability due to data imbalance and limited participant/task diversity. Optimization-based models, using algorithms such as gradient descent and genetic algorithms, showed high biomechanical fidelity but computational challenges and limited computer-aided design (CAD) integration. While a few models have been integrated with existing CAD software such as JACK and Santos™, most lacked ergonomic evaluation and real-time usability. Limitations identified include insufficient diverse datasets, computational inefficiencies, and limited validation in real-world conditions. Future research should prioritize model development supported by scalable motion data using computer vision-based technologies and hybrid strategies that combine learning-based inference with biomechanical simulation, offering a promising path toward achieving both accuracy and physiological realism in posture prediction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Engineering & Physics
Medical Engineering & Physics 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信