种植体支持单冠修复体的应力分布:有限元分析。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sinem Vural , Buket Evren , Coşkun Yıldız
{"title":"种植体支持单冠修复体的应力分布:有限元分析。","authors":"Sinem Vural ,&nbsp;Buket Evren ,&nbsp;Coşkun Yıldız","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of connection, restorative material type<span>, and loading forces on the stress distribution in implant-supported conometric single crown restorations using a three-dimensional finite element analysis method.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Restorations are produced using two different all-ceramic materials used in maxillary right premolar<span> conometric abutments and caps (Conometeric abutment EV, Conometeric Final Cap, Dentsply Implants, Sweden) on implants with three different types of connection: morse taper connection (MTC) (Ankylos, Dentsply Implants, Sweden), conical connection (CC) (Astra-Tech OsseoSpeed EV, Dentsply Implants, Sweden), and internal flat connection (IFC) (Xive, Dentsply, Sweden). Three-dimensional finite element analysis was used to evaluate the amount and distribution of stress around implants under different vertical and oblique loading conditions.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>The maximum stress distribution in the implant abutment contact area in the IFC was </span><u>565.44</u> MPa and screw peak stress values were determined to be <u>518.96</u><span> MPa in the transition zone for MTC. MTC caused the lowest bone stress, although there was no significant difference between the connection systems in terms of material type. The LDS material exhibited the greatest stress on the conometric cap for IFC (447.52 MPa) under oblique loading conditions.</span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Stress on the bone surface and implant abutment contact was higher in the IFC group. IFC has a disadvantage in term of increases the possibility of bone destruction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"126 5","pages":"Article 102484"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress distribution in implant-supported conometric single crown restorations: A finite element analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sinem Vural ,&nbsp;Buket Evren ,&nbsp;Coşkun Yıldız\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of connection, restorative material type<span>, and loading forces on the stress distribution in implant-supported conometric single crown restorations using a three-dimensional finite element analysis method.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Restorations are produced using two different all-ceramic materials used in maxillary right premolar<span> conometric abutments and caps (Conometeric abutment EV, Conometeric Final Cap, Dentsply Implants, Sweden) on implants with three different types of connection: morse taper connection (MTC) (Ankylos, Dentsply Implants, Sweden), conical connection (CC) (Astra-Tech OsseoSpeed EV, Dentsply Implants, Sweden), and internal flat connection (IFC) (Xive, Dentsply, Sweden). Three-dimensional finite element analysis was used to evaluate the amount and distribution of stress around implants under different vertical and oblique loading conditions.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>The maximum stress distribution in the implant abutment contact area in the IFC was </span><u>565.44</u> MPa and screw peak stress values were determined to be <u>518.96</u><span> MPa in the transition zone for MTC. MTC caused the lowest bone stress, although there was no significant difference between the connection systems in terms of material type. The LDS material exhibited the greatest stress on the conometric cap for IFC (447.52 MPa) under oblique loading conditions.</span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Stress on the bone surface and implant abutment contact was higher in the IFC group. IFC has a disadvantage in term of increases the possibility of bone destruction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"126 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 102484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785525002708\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785525002708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用三维有限元分析方法,评价种植体单冠修复体中连接方式、修复体材料类型和加载力对应力分布的影响。方法:使用两种不同的全陶瓷材料制作修复体,用于上颌右前磨牙计量基台和盖(Conometeric基台EV, Conometeric Final Cap, Dentsply implant,瑞典),种植体有三种不同的连接类型:莫氏锥度连接(MTC) (Ankylos, Dentsply implant,瑞典),锥形连接(CC) (Astra-Tech OsseoSpeed EV, Dentsply implant,瑞典)和内平连接(IFC) (Xive, Dentsply,瑞典)。采用三维有限元分析方法对不同垂直和斜向加载条件下种植体周围应力的大小和分布进行了评价。结果:IFC种植体基牙接触区最大应力分布为565.44 MPa, MTC过渡区螺钉峰值应力值为518.96 MPa。MTC引起的骨应力最低,但不同的连接系统在材料类型上没有显著差异。斜向加载条件下,LDS材料在IFC计量帽上的应力最大(447.52 MPa)。结论:IFC组骨面应力和种植基台接触应力均高于IFC组。IFC在增加骨破坏的可能性方面有缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stress distribution in implant-supported conometric single crown restorations: A finite element analysis

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of connection, restorative material type, and loading forces on the stress distribution in implant-supported conometric single crown restorations using a three-dimensional finite element analysis method.

Methods

Restorations are produced using two different all-ceramic materials used in maxillary right premolar conometric abutments and caps (Conometeric abutment EV, Conometeric Final Cap, Dentsply Implants, Sweden) on implants with three different types of connection: morse taper connection (MTC) (Ankylos, Dentsply Implants, Sweden), conical connection (CC) (Astra-Tech OsseoSpeed EV, Dentsply Implants, Sweden), and internal flat connection (IFC) (Xive, Dentsply, Sweden). Three-dimensional finite element analysis was used to evaluate the amount and distribution of stress around implants under different vertical and oblique loading conditions.

Results

The maximum stress distribution in the implant abutment contact area in the IFC was 565.44 MPa and screw peak stress values were determined to be 518.96 MPa in the transition zone for MTC. MTC caused the lowest bone stress, although there was no significant difference between the connection systems in terms of material type. The LDS material exhibited the greatest stress on the conometric cap for IFC (447.52 MPa) under oblique loading conditions.

Conclusion

Stress on the bone surface and implant abutment contact was higher in the IFC group. IFC has a disadvantage in term of increases the possibility of bone destruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信