Ao Liu , Xingyu Jiang , Dan Liu , Zhigang Yang , Xiaowen Xu , Guozhe Yang , Chao long Jin
{"title":"通过融合实验、模拟数据和机器学习模型预测Inconel718沉积层几何形状","authors":"Ao Liu , Xingyu Jiang , Dan Liu , Zhigang Yang , Xiaowen Xu , Guozhe Yang , Chao long Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.optlastec.2025.113466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Laser directed energy deposition (DED) technology is used in a variety of industry sectors. It is well known that manufacturing process parameters affect deposition layer shape, which can affect specimen performance. Although machine learning has provided assistance in predicting the morphology of the deposition layer, depending exclusively on experimental results to predict the deposition layer morphology needs large resources. In this study, the simulation model with an error of less than 5% is established, and then the deposition layer characteristics are predicted using experimental data and the experimental and simulation fusion data set to reduce experimental cost and enhance prediction accuracy. An improved RIME method based on a chaotic mapping mechanism and Levy flight opposition-based learning (CM-LOBL-RIME) is proposed to improve the LSBoost algorithm. A comparative analysis is conducted with eight other models.The SHAP method is employed to evaluate the primary contributions of laser power, powder feed rate, and scanning speed to the predictive model. The results show that the improved LSBoost algorithm predicts deposition depth, height, and width with 0.90, 0.91, and 0.93 for the experimental data set and 0.92, 0.95, and 0.96 for the fusion data set. The experimental data-based prediction model had an accuracy R<sup>2</sup> of 0.923, 0.9279, and 0.942 in the test set, whereas the fusion data-based model had 0.9444, 0.9659, and 0.9715. The new dataset shows deposition layer depth, height, and width errors below 7%, 5%, and 2%, respectively. Thus, the improved machine learning models exhibited remarkable prediction accuracy, excellent generalization, and robustness. The depth and width predicted models are influenced by laser power, while the height predicted models are affected by powder feed rate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19511,"journal":{"name":"Optics and Laser Technology","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 113466"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Inconel718 deposition layer geometry by fusing experimental, simulation data, and machine learning model\",\"authors\":\"Ao Liu , Xingyu Jiang , Dan Liu , Zhigang Yang , Xiaowen Xu , Guozhe Yang , Chao long Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optlastec.2025.113466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Laser directed energy deposition (DED) technology is used in a variety of industry sectors. It is well known that manufacturing process parameters affect deposition layer shape, which can affect specimen performance. Although machine learning has provided assistance in predicting the morphology of the deposition layer, depending exclusively on experimental results to predict the deposition layer morphology needs large resources. In this study, the simulation model with an error of less than 5% is established, and then the deposition layer characteristics are predicted using experimental data and the experimental and simulation fusion data set to reduce experimental cost and enhance prediction accuracy. An improved RIME method based on a chaotic mapping mechanism and Levy flight opposition-based learning (CM-LOBL-RIME) is proposed to improve the LSBoost algorithm. A comparative analysis is conducted with eight other models.The SHAP method is employed to evaluate the primary contributions of laser power, powder feed rate, and scanning speed to the predictive model. The results show that the improved LSBoost algorithm predicts deposition depth, height, and width with 0.90, 0.91, and 0.93 for the experimental data set and 0.92, 0.95, and 0.96 for the fusion data set. The experimental data-based prediction model had an accuracy R<sup>2</sup> of 0.923, 0.9279, and 0.942 in the test set, whereas the fusion data-based model had 0.9444, 0.9659, and 0.9715. The new dataset shows deposition layer depth, height, and width errors below 7%, 5%, and 2%, respectively. Thus, the improved machine learning models exhibited remarkable prediction accuracy, excellent generalization, and robustness. The depth and width predicted models are influenced by laser power, while the height predicted models are affected by powder feed rate.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optics and Laser Technology\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optics and Laser Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030399225010576\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optics and Laser Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030399225010576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prediction of Inconel718 deposition layer geometry by fusing experimental, simulation data, and machine learning model
Laser directed energy deposition (DED) technology is used in a variety of industry sectors. It is well known that manufacturing process parameters affect deposition layer shape, which can affect specimen performance. Although machine learning has provided assistance in predicting the morphology of the deposition layer, depending exclusively on experimental results to predict the deposition layer morphology needs large resources. In this study, the simulation model with an error of less than 5% is established, and then the deposition layer characteristics are predicted using experimental data and the experimental and simulation fusion data set to reduce experimental cost and enhance prediction accuracy. An improved RIME method based on a chaotic mapping mechanism and Levy flight opposition-based learning (CM-LOBL-RIME) is proposed to improve the LSBoost algorithm. A comparative analysis is conducted with eight other models.The SHAP method is employed to evaluate the primary contributions of laser power, powder feed rate, and scanning speed to the predictive model. The results show that the improved LSBoost algorithm predicts deposition depth, height, and width with 0.90, 0.91, and 0.93 for the experimental data set and 0.92, 0.95, and 0.96 for the fusion data set. The experimental data-based prediction model had an accuracy R2 of 0.923, 0.9279, and 0.942 in the test set, whereas the fusion data-based model had 0.9444, 0.9659, and 0.9715. The new dataset shows deposition layer depth, height, and width errors below 7%, 5%, and 2%, respectively. Thus, the improved machine learning models exhibited remarkable prediction accuracy, excellent generalization, and robustness. The depth and width predicted models are influenced by laser power, while the height predicted models are affected by powder feed rate.
期刊介绍:
Optics & Laser Technology aims to provide a vehicle for the publication of a broad range of high quality research and review papers in those fields of scientific and engineering research appertaining to the development and application of the technology of optics and lasers. Papers describing original work in these areas are submitted to rigorous refereeing prior to acceptance for publication.
The scope of Optics & Laser Technology encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas:
•development in all types of lasers
•developments in optoelectronic devices and photonics
•developments in new photonics and optical concepts
•developments in conventional optics, optical instruments and components
•techniques of optical metrology, including interferometry and optical fibre sensors
•LIDAR and other non-contact optical measurement techniques, including optical methods in heat and fluid flow
•applications of lasers to materials processing, optical NDT display (including holography) and optical communication
•research and development in the field of laser safety including studies of hazards resulting from the applications of lasers (laser safety, hazards of laser fume)
•developments in optical computing and optical information processing
•developments in new optical materials
•developments in new optical characterization methods and techniques
•developments in quantum optics
•developments in light assisted micro and nanofabrication methods and techniques
•developments in nanophotonics and biophotonics
•developments in imaging processing and systems