3T时重叠信号分离的MRS采集方法比较。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Tiffany K. Bell , Dana Goerzen , Jamie Near , Ashley D. Harris
{"title":"3T时重叠信号分离的MRS采集方法比较。","authors":"Tiffany K. Bell ,&nbsp;Dana Goerzen ,&nbsp;Jamie Near ,&nbsp;Ashley D. Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) can be used to quantify multiple neurometabolites. However, due to the difficulty of separating overlapping signals at the commonly used field strength of 3 T, the quantified values are often composites of metabolically related chemicals. This can complicate interpretation and mask effects of interest. Therefore, it is important to determine the ability to accurately separate these signals at 3 T. Data acquired at 7 T can provide a benchmark, as higher field strength facilitates spectral resolution and reduces the signal overlap.</div></div><div><h3>New Methods</h3><div>This study assessed the ability of multiple 3 T MRS sequences to separate the commonly acquired neurochemicals (Glutamate (Glu) and Glutamine (Gln); N-Acetyl aspartate (NAA) and N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG); Creatine (Cr) and Phosphocreatine (PCr); Choline (Cho), Phosphocholine (PC) and Glycerophosphocholine (GPC)). We compared metabolites quantified at 3 T from 6 acquisitions (PRESS, TE= 20, 30, 40, 80 ms, semi-LASER, TE=28 ms and STEAM TE=6 ms) with those quantified at 7 T using STEAM (TE=8 ms).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sequences with short echo times (STEAM-6, PRESS-20) generally performed better at separating most metabolites when using correlative and difference analyses with 7 T reference data. The exceptions were NAAG, which was best quantified with PRESS-80, and Cr and PCr, which were not well separated by any sequence.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison with existing methods and conclusion</h3><div>When wanting to specifically separate composite metabolite signals using single voxel MRS, shorter echo times generally perform better. Researchers should be mindful of the effects of acquisition parameters on the metabolite measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"423 ","pages":"Article 110523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of MRS acquisition methods for separation of overlapping signals at 3 T\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany K. Bell ,&nbsp;Dana Goerzen ,&nbsp;Jamie Near ,&nbsp;Ashley D. Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) can be used to quantify multiple neurometabolites. However, due to the difficulty of separating overlapping signals at the commonly used field strength of 3 T, the quantified values are often composites of metabolically related chemicals. This can complicate interpretation and mask effects of interest. Therefore, it is important to determine the ability to accurately separate these signals at 3 T. Data acquired at 7 T can provide a benchmark, as higher field strength facilitates spectral resolution and reduces the signal overlap.</div></div><div><h3>New Methods</h3><div>This study assessed the ability of multiple 3 T MRS sequences to separate the commonly acquired neurochemicals (Glutamate (Glu) and Glutamine (Gln); N-Acetyl aspartate (NAA) and N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG); Creatine (Cr) and Phosphocreatine (PCr); Choline (Cho), Phosphocholine (PC) and Glycerophosphocholine (GPC)). We compared metabolites quantified at 3 T from 6 acquisitions (PRESS, TE= 20, 30, 40, 80 ms, semi-LASER, TE=28 ms and STEAM TE=6 ms) with those quantified at 7 T using STEAM (TE=8 ms).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sequences with short echo times (STEAM-6, PRESS-20) generally performed better at separating most metabolites when using correlative and difference analyses with 7 T reference data. The exceptions were NAAG, which was best quantified with PRESS-80, and Cr and PCr, which were not well separated by any sequence.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison with existing methods and conclusion</h3><div>When wanting to specifically separate composite metabolite signals using single voxel MRS, shorter echo times generally perform better. Researchers should be mindful of the effects of acquisition parameters on the metabolite measures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"volume\":\"423 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027025001670\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027025001670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:质子磁共振波谱(MRS)可用于定量多种神经代谢物。然而,由于在常用的3T场强下难以分离重叠信号,因此量化值通常是代谢相关化学物质的复合。这可能会使解释复杂化,并掩盖兴趣的影响。因此,确定在3T时准确分离这些信号的能力是很重要的。在7T时获得的数据可以提供一个基准,因为更高的场强有助于光谱分辨率并减少信号重叠。本研究评估了多个3T MRS序列分离常见获得性神经化学物质(谷氨酸(Glu)和谷氨酰胺(Gln))的能力;n -乙酰天冬氨酸(NAA)和n -乙酰天冬氨酸谷氨酸(NAAG);肌酸(Cr)和磷酸肌酸(PCr);胆碱(Cho)、磷酸胆碱(PC)和甘油磷酸胆碱(GPC))。我们比较了6次采集(PRESS、TE= 20、30、40、80 ms、semi-LASER、TE=28 ms和STEAM TE=6 ms)在3T时定量的代谢物与使用STEAM (TE=8 ms)在7T时定量的代谢物。结果:与7T参考数据进行相关分析和差异分析时,回声时间较短的序列(STEAM-6、PRESS-20)在分离大多数代谢物方面表现较好。例外的是NAAG, PRESS-80是最好的定量方法,Cr和PCr不能很好地分离任何序列。与现有方法的比较及结论当需要利用单体素MRS特异性分离复合代谢物信号时,通常较短的回波时间效果更好。研究人员应注意获取参数对代谢物测量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of MRS acquisition methods for separation of overlapping signals at 3 T

Background

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) can be used to quantify multiple neurometabolites. However, due to the difficulty of separating overlapping signals at the commonly used field strength of 3 T, the quantified values are often composites of metabolically related chemicals. This can complicate interpretation and mask effects of interest. Therefore, it is important to determine the ability to accurately separate these signals at 3 T. Data acquired at 7 T can provide a benchmark, as higher field strength facilitates spectral resolution and reduces the signal overlap.

New Methods

This study assessed the ability of multiple 3 T MRS sequences to separate the commonly acquired neurochemicals (Glutamate (Glu) and Glutamine (Gln); N-Acetyl aspartate (NAA) and N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG); Creatine (Cr) and Phosphocreatine (PCr); Choline (Cho), Phosphocholine (PC) and Glycerophosphocholine (GPC)). We compared metabolites quantified at 3 T from 6 acquisitions (PRESS, TE= 20, 30, 40, 80 ms, semi-LASER, TE=28 ms and STEAM TE=6 ms) with those quantified at 7 T using STEAM (TE=8 ms).

Results

Sequences with short echo times (STEAM-6, PRESS-20) generally performed better at separating most metabolites when using correlative and difference analyses with 7 T reference data. The exceptions were NAAG, which was best quantified with PRESS-80, and Cr and PCr, which were not well separated by any sequence.

Comparison with existing methods and conclusion

When wanting to specifically separate composite metabolite signals using single voxel MRS, shorter echo times generally perform better. Researchers should be mindful of the effects of acquisition parameters on the metabolite measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信