Wentong Yu, Yunsi He, Xuan Qiu, Ying Yao, Qingqing Ye, Lei Feng, Zixuan Xu, Yusong Zhou, Yangfei Pang, Yudan Zhong, Qiuying Li, Junpeng Yuan, Yun Wen, Jinrong Li
{"title":"儿童弱视的眼轴长度动态和闭锁治疗的安全性:一项纵向分析。","authors":"Wentong Yu, Yunsi He, Xuan Qiu, Ying Yao, Qingqing Ye, Lei Feng, Zixuan Xu, Yusong Zhou, Yangfei Pang, Yudan Zhong, Qiuying Li, Junpeng Yuan, Yun Wen, Jinrong Li","doi":"10.1167/iovs.66.9.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of occlusion therapy on the elongation of axial length in children with amblyopia using real-world big data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 2932 children aged 3 to 15 years undergoing occlusion therapy with varying patching durations was analyzed using longitudinal data from the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (May 1, 2019 to September 30, 2023). Retrospective analyses utilized multivariable linear regression to assess associations between patching duration and axial length elongation. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to evaluate interocular axial length differences. The analyses were adjusted for factors including revisit interval, age, sex, baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), initial axial length, spherical equivalent, amblyopia type, and concurrent treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean annual axial length increase was 0.23 ± 0.22 mm. Patching had no significant overall effect on axial length elongation (β = -0.02, P = 0.12), even for long daily patching (≥5 hours/day). Subgroup analyses revealed reduced axial length elongation in patched eyes of school-age children (6-12 years) with shorter baseline axial lengths, suggesting age- and baseline-specific effects. GEE analysis showed no significant interocular differences except among preschool children (3-5 years), where the observed eyes exhibited slightly less axial length elongation compared with fellow eyes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Occlusion therapy is safe for amblyopia management. Tailored regimens based on age and baseline ocular characteristics are recommended to optimize therapeutic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14620,"journal":{"name":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","volume":"66 9","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Axial Length Dynamics and Safety of Occlusion Therapy in Pediatric Amblyopia: A Longitudinal Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wentong Yu, Yunsi He, Xuan Qiu, Ying Yao, Qingqing Ye, Lei Feng, Zixuan Xu, Yusong Zhou, Yangfei Pang, Yudan Zhong, Qiuying Li, Junpeng Yuan, Yun Wen, Jinrong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/iovs.66.9.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of occlusion therapy on the elongation of axial length in children with amblyopia using real-world big data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 2932 children aged 3 to 15 years undergoing occlusion therapy with varying patching durations was analyzed using longitudinal data from the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (May 1, 2019 to September 30, 2023). Retrospective analyses utilized multivariable linear regression to assess associations between patching duration and axial length elongation. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to evaluate interocular axial length differences. The analyses were adjusted for factors including revisit interval, age, sex, baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), initial axial length, spherical equivalent, amblyopia type, and concurrent treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean annual axial length increase was 0.23 ± 0.22 mm. Patching had no significant overall effect on axial length elongation (β = -0.02, P = 0.12), even for long daily patching (≥5 hours/day). Subgroup analyses revealed reduced axial length elongation in patched eyes of school-age children (6-12 years) with shorter baseline axial lengths, suggesting age- and baseline-specific effects. GEE analysis showed no significant interocular differences except among preschool children (3-5 years), where the observed eyes exhibited slightly less axial length elongation compared with fellow eyes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Occlusion therapy is safe for amblyopia management. Tailored regimens based on age and baseline ocular characteristics are recommended to optimize therapeutic outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science\",\"volume\":\"66 9\",\"pages\":\"12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236630/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.66.9.12\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.66.9.12","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是利用真实世界的大数据,评估遮挡治疗对弱视儿童眼轴长度延长的影响。方法:利用中山眼科中心(2019年5月1日至2023年9月30日)的纵向数据,对2932名3 ~ 15岁接受不同补片时间遮挡治疗的儿童进行队列分析。回顾性分析利用多变量线性回归来评估补片持续时间和轴长延伸之间的关系。使用广义估计方程(GEEs)评估眼间轴长差异。根据重访时间间隔、年龄、性别、基线最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、初始眼轴长度、球形当量、弱视类型和同时治疗等因素对分析结果进行调整。结果:年平均轴长增加0.23±0.22 mm。即使长时间的补片(≥5小时/天),补片对轴长延长的总体影响也不显著(β = -0.02, P = 0.12)。亚组分析显示,学龄儿童(6-12岁)眼罩后眼轴长度延长减少,基线眼轴长度较短,提示年龄和基线特异性效应。GEE分析显示,除了学龄前儿童(3-5岁)外,没有显著的眼间差异,在学龄前儿童中,观察到的眼睛轴向长度延长比其他眼睛略少。结论:遮挡治疗弱视是安全的。建议根据年龄和基线眼部特征定制方案以优化治疗结果。
Axial Length Dynamics and Safety of Occlusion Therapy in Pediatric Amblyopia: A Longitudinal Analysis.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of occlusion therapy on the elongation of axial length in children with amblyopia using real-world big data.
Methods: A cohort of 2932 children aged 3 to 15 years undergoing occlusion therapy with varying patching durations was analyzed using longitudinal data from the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (May 1, 2019 to September 30, 2023). Retrospective analyses utilized multivariable linear regression to assess associations between patching duration and axial length elongation. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to evaluate interocular axial length differences. The analyses were adjusted for factors including revisit interval, age, sex, baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), initial axial length, spherical equivalent, amblyopia type, and concurrent treatments.
Results: The mean annual axial length increase was 0.23 ± 0.22 mm. Patching had no significant overall effect on axial length elongation (β = -0.02, P = 0.12), even for long daily patching (≥5 hours/day). Subgroup analyses revealed reduced axial length elongation in patched eyes of school-age children (6-12 years) with shorter baseline axial lengths, suggesting age- and baseline-specific effects. GEE analysis showed no significant interocular differences except among preschool children (3-5 years), where the observed eyes exhibited slightly less axial length elongation compared with fellow eyes.
Conclusions: Occlusion therapy is safe for amblyopia management. Tailored regimens based on age and baseline ocular characteristics are recommended to optimize therapeutic outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS), published as ready online, is a peer-reviewed academic journal of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). IOVS features original research, mostly pertaining to clinical and laboratory ophthalmology and vision research in general.