纽甜(e961)作为食品添加剂的再评价

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), Laurence Castle, Monica Andreassen, Gabriele Aquilina, Maria Lourdes Bastos, Polly Boon, Biagio Fallico, Reginald FitzGerald, Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez, Bettina Grasl-Kraupp, Ursula Gundert-Remy, Rainer Gürtler, Eric Houdeau, Marcin Kurek, Henriqueta Louro, Patricia Morales, Sabina Passamonti, Monika Batke, Ellen Bruzell, James Chipman, Riccardo Crebelli, Cristina Fortes, Peter Fürst, Eric Gaffet, Cheyns Karlien, Thorhallur Halldorsson, Jean-Charles Leblanc, Oliver Lindtner, Katrin Loeschner, Jan Mast, Manuela Mirat, Alicja Mortensen, Anna Undas, Matthew Wright, Stefania Barmaz, Consuelo Civitella, Jose Cortiñas Abrahantes, Pauline Le Gall, Elena Mazzoli, Agnieszka Mech, Josef Daniel Rasinger, Ana Rincon, Francesca Riolo, Camilla Smeraldi, Alexandra Tard, Panagiota Zakidou, Federica Lodi
{"title":"纽甜(e961)作为食品添加剂的再评价","authors":"EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF),&nbsp;Laurence Castle,&nbsp;Monica Andreassen,&nbsp;Gabriele Aquilina,&nbsp;Maria Lourdes Bastos,&nbsp;Polly Boon,&nbsp;Biagio Fallico,&nbsp;Reginald FitzGerald,&nbsp;Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez,&nbsp;Bettina Grasl-Kraupp,&nbsp;Ursula Gundert-Remy,&nbsp;Rainer Gürtler,&nbsp;Eric Houdeau,&nbsp;Marcin Kurek,&nbsp;Henriqueta Louro,&nbsp;Patricia Morales,&nbsp;Sabina Passamonti,&nbsp;Monika Batke,&nbsp;Ellen Bruzell,&nbsp;James Chipman,&nbsp;Riccardo Crebelli,&nbsp;Cristina Fortes,&nbsp;Peter Fürst,&nbsp;Eric Gaffet,&nbsp;Cheyns Karlien,&nbsp;Thorhallur Halldorsson,&nbsp;Jean-Charles Leblanc,&nbsp;Oliver Lindtner,&nbsp;Katrin Loeschner,&nbsp;Jan Mast,&nbsp;Manuela Mirat,&nbsp;Alicja Mortensen,&nbsp;Anna Undas,&nbsp;Matthew Wright,&nbsp;Stefania Barmaz,&nbsp;Consuelo Civitella,&nbsp;Jose Cortiñas Abrahantes,&nbsp;Pauline Le Gall,&nbsp;Elena Mazzoli,&nbsp;Agnieszka Mech,&nbsp;Josef Daniel Rasinger,&nbsp;Ana Rincon,&nbsp;Francesca Riolo,&nbsp;Camilla Smeraldi,&nbsp;Alexandra Tard,&nbsp;Panagiota Zakidou,&nbsp;Federica Lodi","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present opinion deals with the re-evaluation of neotame (E 961) as a food additive. Neotame is the chemically manufactured compound N-[N-(3,3-dimethylbutyl)-<span>l</span>-α-aspartyl]-<span>l</span>-phenylalanine 1-methyl ester. The main impurity of neotame (E 961) is also a degradation product (de-esterified form), N-[N-(3,3-dimethylbutyl)-<span>l</span>-α-aspartyl]-<span>L</span>-phenylalanine (NC-00751) and the primary metabolite. No new data were received following the call for biological and toxicological data. A summary of the toxicological studies available in the EFSA opinion of 2007 is presented and studies gathered from the literature are summarised. Neotame is rapidly absorbed and pre-systemically metabolised, systemic intact neotame is likely to be excreted in the urine with its metabolites. The potential aneugenic effects at the site of contact are not expected to occur; overall, there is no concern for genotoxicity of neotame (E 961) at the maximum permitted levels or reported use levels. A review of the other endpoints from the already available toxicological database did not indicate an adverse effect for neotame at the highest doses tested. The Panel established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 10 mg/kg bw per day for neotame based on the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 1000 mg/kg bw per day from a 52-week chronic and 104-week carcinogenicity studies in rats. This ADI replaces the ADI of 2 mg/kg bw per day established by EFSA in 2007. The resulting exposure to methanol and its metabolite formaldehyde from the use of neotame at the ADI of 10 mg/kg bw per day does not raise a concern. The dietary exposure estimates of neotame (E 961) for the different population groups of all exposure scenarios did not exceed the ADI. The Panel concluded that there is no safety concern for neotame (E 961) at the currently permitted and reported uses and use levels. The Panel recommended the European Commission to consider revising the EU specifications of neotame (E 961).</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9480","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-evaluation of neotame (E 961) as food additive\",\"authors\":\"EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF),&nbsp;Laurence Castle,&nbsp;Monica Andreassen,&nbsp;Gabriele Aquilina,&nbsp;Maria Lourdes Bastos,&nbsp;Polly Boon,&nbsp;Biagio Fallico,&nbsp;Reginald FitzGerald,&nbsp;Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez,&nbsp;Bettina Grasl-Kraupp,&nbsp;Ursula Gundert-Remy,&nbsp;Rainer Gürtler,&nbsp;Eric Houdeau,&nbsp;Marcin Kurek,&nbsp;Henriqueta Louro,&nbsp;Patricia Morales,&nbsp;Sabina Passamonti,&nbsp;Monika Batke,&nbsp;Ellen Bruzell,&nbsp;James Chipman,&nbsp;Riccardo Crebelli,&nbsp;Cristina Fortes,&nbsp;Peter Fürst,&nbsp;Eric Gaffet,&nbsp;Cheyns Karlien,&nbsp;Thorhallur Halldorsson,&nbsp;Jean-Charles Leblanc,&nbsp;Oliver Lindtner,&nbsp;Katrin Loeschner,&nbsp;Jan Mast,&nbsp;Manuela Mirat,&nbsp;Alicja Mortensen,&nbsp;Anna Undas,&nbsp;Matthew Wright,&nbsp;Stefania Barmaz,&nbsp;Consuelo Civitella,&nbsp;Jose Cortiñas Abrahantes,&nbsp;Pauline Le Gall,&nbsp;Elena Mazzoli,&nbsp;Agnieszka Mech,&nbsp;Josef Daniel Rasinger,&nbsp;Ana Rincon,&nbsp;Francesca Riolo,&nbsp;Camilla Smeraldi,&nbsp;Alexandra Tard,&nbsp;Panagiota Zakidou,&nbsp;Federica Lodi\",\"doi\":\"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The present opinion deals with the re-evaluation of neotame (E 961) as a food additive. Neotame is the chemically manufactured compound N-[N-(3,3-dimethylbutyl)-<span>l</span>-α-aspartyl]-<span>l</span>-phenylalanine 1-methyl ester. The main impurity of neotame (E 961) is also a degradation product (de-esterified form), N-[N-(3,3-dimethylbutyl)-<span>l</span>-α-aspartyl]-<span>L</span>-phenylalanine (NC-00751) and the primary metabolite. No new data were received following the call for biological and toxicological data. A summary of the toxicological studies available in the EFSA opinion of 2007 is presented and studies gathered from the literature are summarised. Neotame is rapidly absorbed and pre-systemically metabolised, systemic intact neotame is likely to be excreted in the urine with its metabolites. The potential aneugenic effects at the site of contact are not expected to occur; overall, there is no concern for genotoxicity of neotame (E 961) at the maximum permitted levels or reported use levels. A review of the other endpoints from the already available toxicological database did not indicate an adverse effect for neotame at the highest doses tested. The Panel established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 10 mg/kg bw per day for neotame based on the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 1000 mg/kg bw per day from a 52-week chronic and 104-week carcinogenicity studies in rats. This ADI replaces the ADI of 2 mg/kg bw per day established by EFSA in 2007. The resulting exposure to methanol and its metabolite formaldehyde from the use of neotame at the ADI of 10 mg/kg bw per day does not raise a concern. The dietary exposure estimates of neotame (E 961) for the different population groups of all exposure scenarios did not exceed the ADI. The Panel concluded that there is no safety concern for neotame (E 961) at the currently permitted and reported uses and use levels. The Panel recommended the European Commission to consider revising the EU specifications of neotame (E 961).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9480\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9480\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9480","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本意见涉及对纽甜(e961)作为食品添加剂的重新评价。纽甜是化学合成的化合物N-[N-(3,3-二甲基丁基)- 1- α-天冬氨酸]-l-苯丙氨酸1-甲酯。纽甜(E 961)的主要杂质也是降解产物(去酯化形式)N-[N-(3,3-二甲基丁基)- 1 -α-天冬氨酸]- l-苯丙氨酸(NC-00751)和初级代谢物。在要求提供生物学和毒理学数据之后,没有收到新的数据。介绍了欧洲食品安全局2007年意见中提供的毒理学研究摘要,并对从文献中收集的研究进行了总结。纽甜被迅速吸收并在全身前代谢,全身完整的纽甜可能随其代谢物随尿液排出。预计在接触部位不会发生潜在的非优生效应;总体而言,在最大允许水平或报告使用水平下,纽甜(e961)不存在遗传毒性问题。对现有毒理学数据库中其他终点的回顾没有显示在最高剂量下纽甜有不良反应。小组根据对大鼠进行的52周慢性和104周致癌性研究得出的每日1000 mg/kg bw的未观察到的不良反应水平(NOAEL),确定了纽甜的可接受日摄入量(ADI)为每天10 mg/kg bw。该建议摄入量取代了欧洲食品安全局于2007年制定的每日2毫克/公斤体重的建议摄入量。以每天10毫克/公斤体重的推荐摄入量使用纽甜所导致的甲醇及其代谢物甲醛暴露不值得关注。在所有暴露情况下,不同人群对纽甜的饮食暴露估计(e961)没有超过ADI。专家小组得出结论,在目前允许和报告的用途和使用水平下,纽甜(e961)不存在安全问题。专家组建议欧盟委员会考虑修订欧盟纽甜(e961)的规格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Re-evaluation of neotame (E 961) as food additive

Re-evaluation of neotame (E 961) as food additive

The present opinion deals with the re-evaluation of neotame (E 961) as a food additive. Neotame is the chemically manufactured compound N-[N-(3,3-dimethylbutyl)-l-α-aspartyl]-l-phenylalanine 1-methyl ester. The main impurity of neotame (E 961) is also a degradation product (de-esterified form), N-[N-(3,3-dimethylbutyl)-l-α-aspartyl]-L-phenylalanine (NC-00751) and the primary metabolite. No new data were received following the call for biological and toxicological data. A summary of the toxicological studies available in the EFSA opinion of 2007 is presented and studies gathered from the literature are summarised. Neotame is rapidly absorbed and pre-systemically metabolised, systemic intact neotame is likely to be excreted in the urine with its metabolites. The potential aneugenic effects at the site of contact are not expected to occur; overall, there is no concern for genotoxicity of neotame (E 961) at the maximum permitted levels or reported use levels. A review of the other endpoints from the already available toxicological database did not indicate an adverse effect for neotame at the highest doses tested. The Panel established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 10 mg/kg bw per day for neotame based on the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 1000 mg/kg bw per day from a 52-week chronic and 104-week carcinogenicity studies in rats. This ADI replaces the ADI of 2 mg/kg bw per day established by EFSA in 2007. The resulting exposure to methanol and its metabolite formaldehyde from the use of neotame at the ADI of 10 mg/kg bw per day does not raise a concern. The dietary exposure estimates of neotame (E 961) for the different population groups of all exposure scenarios did not exceed the ADI. The Panel concluded that there is no safety concern for neotame (E 961) at the currently permitted and reported uses and use levels. The Panel recommended the European Commission to consider revising the EU specifications of neotame (E 961).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信