基于专家的德国绿色公路客运燃料替代评价

IF 3.3 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Javier Perez Vera , Ali E. Torkayesh , Sandra Venghaus
{"title":"基于专家的德国绿色公路客运燃料替代评价","authors":"Javier Perez Vera ,&nbsp;Ali E. Torkayesh ,&nbsp;Sandra Venghaus","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To achieve climate-neutrality in Germany by 2045, a profound transformation across all sectors is necessary. The transport sector is responsible for a significant proportion of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Germany and the European Union more widely. With low reductions in GHG emissions, the fossil fuel-dependent German road passenger sector is regarded as one of the primary challenges to achieving the climate-neutrality target. Thus, replacing current fossil fuels with sustainable alternatives is of high importance for defossilizing the road passenger transport sector and moving towards climate-neutrality. However, the identification of promising fuel alternatives and their prioritization for implementation is a complex and multi-dimensional decision-making problem that requires robust tools to generate reliable solutions. For this purpose, a holistic approach was developed using an entropy-based consolidated multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for fuel evaluation under technical and sustainability frameworks based on stakeholder opinions. Methodological and managerial sensitivity analyses are conducted to show the robustness of the results under different circumstances. The results indicate that GHG emissions with an importance of 22%, policy compliance with an importance of 13%, and ecotoxicity with an importance of 9% are the most important criteria for fuel evaluation. On the other hand, electric vehicles and green hydrogen demonstrate the most promising performance for shaping the future road transport sector, followed by advanced biofuels and Power-to-X fuels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 101502"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An expert-based evaluation of fuel alternatives for green road passenger transport in Germany\",\"authors\":\"Javier Perez Vera ,&nbsp;Ali E. Torkayesh ,&nbsp;Sandra Venghaus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To achieve climate-neutrality in Germany by 2045, a profound transformation across all sectors is necessary. The transport sector is responsible for a significant proportion of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Germany and the European Union more widely. With low reductions in GHG emissions, the fossil fuel-dependent German road passenger sector is regarded as one of the primary challenges to achieving the climate-neutrality target. Thus, replacing current fossil fuels with sustainable alternatives is of high importance for defossilizing the road passenger transport sector and moving towards climate-neutrality. However, the identification of promising fuel alternatives and their prioritization for implementation is a complex and multi-dimensional decision-making problem that requires robust tools to generate reliable solutions. For this purpose, a holistic approach was developed using an entropy-based consolidated multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for fuel evaluation under technical and sustainability frameworks based on stakeholder opinions. Methodological and managerial sensitivity analyses are conducted to show the robustness of the results under different circumstances. The results indicate that GHG emissions with an importance of 22%, policy compliance with an importance of 13%, and ecotoxicity with an importance of 9% are the most important criteria for fuel evaluation. On the other hand, electric vehicles and green hydrogen demonstrate the most promising performance for shaping the future road transport sector, followed by advanced biofuels and Power-to-X fuels.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25001397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25001397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了在2045年之前实现德国的气候中和,所有部门都必须进行深刻的变革。在德国和更广泛的欧盟,交通运输部门的温室气体排放量占很大比例。由于温室气体排放量减少较少,依赖化石燃料的德国公路客运部门被视为实现气候中和目标的主要挑战之一。因此,用可持续的替代品取代目前的化石燃料对于公路客运部门的去化石化和向气候中立迈进至关重要。然而,确定有前景的替代燃料及其实施的优先顺序是一个复杂的、多维度的决策问题,需要强大的工具来生成可靠的解决方案。为此,在基于利益相关者意见的技术和可持续性框架下,开发了一种基于熵的综合多标准决策分析(MCDA)的燃料评估整体方法。进行方法和管理敏感性分析,以显示结果在不同情况下的稳健性。结果表明,温室气体排放重要性为22%,政策符合性重要性为13%,生态毒性重要性为9%,是燃料评价的最重要标准。另一方面,电动汽车和绿色氢燃料在塑造未来道路运输部门方面表现出最有希望的表现,其次是先进的生物燃料和Power-to-X燃料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An expert-based evaluation of fuel alternatives for green road passenger transport in Germany
To achieve climate-neutrality in Germany by 2045, a profound transformation across all sectors is necessary. The transport sector is responsible for a significant proportion of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Germany and the European Union more widely. With low reductions in GHG emissions, the fossil fuel-dependent German road passenger sector is regarded as one of the primary challenges to achieving the climate-neutrality target. Thus, replacing current fossil fuels with sustainable alternatives is of high importance for defossilizing the road passenger transport sector and moving towards climate-neutrality. However, the identification of promising fuel alternatives and their prioritization for implementation is a complex and multi-dimensional decision-making problem that requires robust tools to generate reliable solutions. For this purpose, a holistic approach was developed using an entropy-based consolidated multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for fuel evaluation under technical and sustainability frameworks based on stakeholder opinions. Methodological and managerial sensitivity analyses are conducted to show the robustness of the results under different circumstances. The results indicate that GHG emissions with an importance of 22%, policy compliance with an importance of 13%, and ecotoxicity with an importance of 9% are the most important criteria for fuel evaluation. On the other hand, electric vehicles and green hydrogen demonstrate the most promising performance for shaping the future road transport sector, followed by advanced biofuels and Power-to-X fuels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信