陆生脊椎动物持续的能量多样性关系

IF 45.8 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Science Pub Date : 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1126/science.adu2590
Marco Túlio P. Coelho, Elisa Barreto, José Alexandre F. Diniz-Filho, Thiago F. Rangel, Eliška Bohdalková, David Storch, Yun-Ting Jang, Mikael Pontarp, Fernanda Cassemiro, Matheus Lima de Araujo, Pincelli M. Hull, Catherine H. Graham
{"title":"陆生脊椎动物持续的能量多样性关系","authors":"Marco Túlio P. Coelho,&nbsp;Elisa Barreto,&nbsp;José Alexandre F. Diniz-Filho,&nbsp;Thiago F. Rangel,&nbsp;Eliška Bohdalková,&nbsp;David Storch,&nbsp;Yun-Ting Jang,&nbsp;Mikael Pontarp,&nbsp;Fernanda Cassemiro,&nbsp;Matheus Lima de Araujo,&nbsp;Pincelli M. Hull,&nbsp;Catherine H. Graham","doi":"10.1126/science.adu2590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div >Ecologists have long proposed that environments providing more energy can support more species, yet empirical evidence frequently contradicts this expectation. We argue that such inconsistencies result from confounding geographical influences that mask the true relationship between species richness and energy-related factors. Here, by comparing species richness across different climate conditions, we disentangle the direct effects of temperature, precipitation, and primary productivity from the confounding impacts of the area and isolation of various climates. Using a global analysis of terrestrial vertebrates, we reveal clear and consistent relationships between energy-related factors and species richness. Our findings clarify existing ecological theory and illustrate how adopting a climate space perspective advances biodiversity research, providing critical insights into biodiversity patterns and their responses to environmental change.</div>","PeriodicalId":21678,"journal":{"name":"Science","volume":"389 6755","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":45.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistent energy-diversity relationships in terrestrial vertebrates\",\"authors\":\"Marco Túlio P. Coelho,&nbsp;Elisa Barreto,&nbsp;José Alexandre F. Diniz-Filho,&nbsp;Thiago F. Rangel,&nbsp;Eliška Bohdalková,&nbsp;David Storch,&nbsp;Yun-Ting Jang,&nbsp;Mikael Pontarp,&nbsp;Fernanda Cassemiro,&nbsp;Matheus Lima de Araujo,&nbsp;Pincelli M. Hull,&nbsp;Catherine H. Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.1126/science.adu2590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div >Ecologists have long proposed that environments providing more energy can support more species, yet empirical evidence frequently contradicts this expectation. We argue that such inconsistencies result from confounding geographical influences that mask the true relationship between species richness and energy-related factors. Here, by comparing species richness across different climate conditions, we disentangle the direct effects of temperature, precipitation, and primary productivity from the confounding impacts of the area and isolation of various climates. Using a global analysis of terrestrial vertebrates, we reveal clear and consistent relationships between energy-related factors and species richness. Our findings clarify existing ecological theory and illustrate how adopting a climate space perspective advances biodiversity research, providing critical insights into biodiversity patterns and their responses to environmental change.</div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science\",\"volume\":\"389 6755\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":45.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adu2590\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adu2590","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态学家早就提出,提供更多能量的环境可以支持更多的物种,然而经验证据经常与这一预期相矛盾。我们认为,这种不一致是由混淆的地理影响造成的,这些影响掩盖了物种丰富度和能源相关因素之间的真正关系。在这里,通过比较不同气候条件下的物种丰富度,我们将温度、降水和初级生产力的直接影响与各种气候的面积和隔离的混杂影响区分开来。通过对陆生脊椎动物的全球分析,我们揭示了能量相关因子与物种丰富度之间清晰一致的关系。我们的研究结果澄清了现有的生态学理论,说明了采用气候空间视角如何推进生物多样性研究,为生物多样性模式及其对环境变化的响应提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consistent energy-diversity relationships in terrestrial vertebrates
Ecologists have long proposed that environments providing more energy can support more species, yet empirical evidence frequently contradicts this expectation. We argue that such inconsistencies result from confounding geographical influences that mask the true relationship between species richness and energy-related factors. Here, by comparing species richness across different climate conditions, we disentangle the direct effects of temperature, precipitation, and primary productivity from the confounding impacts of the area and isolation of various climates. Using a global analysis of terrestrial vertebrates, we reveal clear and consistent relationships between energy-related factors and species richness. Our findings clarify existing ecological theory and illustrate how adopting a climate space perspective advances biodiversity research, providing critical insights into biodiversity patterns and their responses to environmental change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science
Science 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
61.10
自引率
0.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Science is a leading outlet for scientific news, commentary, and cutting-edge research. Through its print and online incarnations, Science reaches an estimated worldwide readership of more than one million. Science’s authorship is global too, and its articles consistently rank among the world's most cited research. Science serves as a forum for discussion of important issues related to the advancement of science by publishing material on which a consensus has been reached as well as including the presentation of minority or conflicting points of view. Accordingly, all articles published in Science—including editorials, news and comment, and book reviews—are signed and reflect the individual views of the authors and not official points of view adopted by AAAS or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated. Science seeks to publish those papers that are most influential in their fields or across fields and that will significantly advance scientific understanding. Selected papers should present novel and broadly important data, syntheses, or concepts. They should merit recognition by the wider scientific community and general public provided by publication in Science, beyond that provided by specialty journals. Science welcomes submissions from all fields of science and from any source. The editors are committed to the prompt evaluation and publication of submitted papers while upholding high standards that support reproducibility of published research. Science is published weekly; selected papers are published online ahead of print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信