基于物体的各向异性注意力转移是由视野经络对神经注意梯度的不均匀影响引起的。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
David Hughes, Adam J Barnas, Adam S Greenberg
{"title":"基于物体的各向异性注意力转移是由视野经络对神经注意梯度的不均匀影响引起的。","authors":"David Hughes, Adam J Barnas, Adam S Greenberg","doi":"10.1152/jn.00554.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Object-based attention prioritizes the processing of information appearing within a selected object. We previously showed an object-based shift direction anisotropy (SDA) whereby horizontal shifts are more efficient than vertical shifts (1, 2), an effect modulated by the visual field meridians (3). Our present aim was to understand how the functional brain mechanisms of attention give rise to the SDA. We hypothesized that the SDA arises from attentional resources being partitioned differently by horizontal and vertical meridians. To test this, we used fMRI of visual cortex while subjects shifted attention horizontally and vertically within a single, L-shaped object. An SDA was observed when targets crossed the visual field meridians, and the object vertex was positioned in the upper-left corner. However, no SDA was observed when the object vertex was positioned in the lower-right corner. Cue-related activations revealed that attention spreads throughout the vertical component of each object (even to locations where the target never appeared). Additionally, the vertical meridian seemed to impede the spread of attention for the upper-left object's horizontal component. However, for the lower-right object, the horizontal component showed a similar attentional modulation to its vertical component, commensurate with behavioral performance in response to that object. These results suggest the efficiency of horizontal shifts crossing the vertical meridian is enhanced by the support of attentional resources from both hemispheres. As such, we offer a refinement of how the visual field meridians may influence the spread of object-based attention via an anisotropic attention gradient.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anisotropic object-based shifts of attention arise from unequal influences of visual field meridians on neural attention gradients.\",\"authors\":\"David Hughes, Adam J Barnas, Adam S Greenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/jn.00554.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Object-based attention prioritizes the processing of information appearing within a selected object. We previously showed an object-based shift direction anisotropy (SDA) whereby horizontal shifts are more efficient than vertical shifts (1, 2), an effect modulated by the visual field meridians (3). Our present aim was to understand how the functional brain mechanisms of attention give rise to the SDA. We hypothesized that the SDA arises from attentional resources being partitioned differently by horizontal and vertical meridians. To test this, we used fMRI of visual cortex while subjects shifted attention horizontally and vertically within a single, L-shaped object. An SDA was observed when targets crossed the visual field meridians, and the object vertex was positioned in the upper-left corner. However, no SDA was observed when the object vertex was positioned in the lower-right corner. Cue-related activations revealed that attention spreads throughout the vertical component of each object (even to locations where the target never appeared). Additionally, the vertical meridian seemed to impede the spread of attention for the upper-left object's horizontal component. However, for the lower-right object, the horizontal component showed a similar attentional modulation to its vertical component, commensurate with behavioral performance in response to that object. These results suggest the efficiency of horizontal shifts crossing the vertical meridian is enhanced by the support of attentional resources from both hemispheres. As such, we offer a refinement of how the visual field meridians may influence the spread of object-based attention via an anisotropic attention gradient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00554.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00554.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于对象的注意力优先处理出现在选定对象中的信息。我们之前展示了一个基于物体的偏移方向各向异性(SDA),其中水平偏移比垂直偏移更有效(1,2),这种效应由视野子午线调制(3)。我们目前的目的是了解注意的功能性脑机制是如何引起SDA的。我们假设SDA是由于注意资源被水平和垂直子午线不同地分割而产生的。为了验证这一点,我们使用了视觉皮层的功能磁共振成像,同时受试者在一个l形物体内水平和垂直地转移注意力。当目标穿过视野子午线时,观察到一个SDA,目标顶点定位在左上角。然而,当目标顶点位于右下角时,没有观察到SDA。与线索相关的激活表明,注意力在每个物体的垂直部分传播(甚至到目标从未出现的位置)。此外,垂直子午线似乎阻碍了人们对左上角物体水平部分的注意力分散。然而,对于右下方的物体,水平分量表现出与垂直分量相似的注意调制,与对该物体的反应行为表现相称。这些结果表明,在来自两个半球的注意力资源的支持下,跨越垂直子午线的水平转移的效率得到了提高。因此,我们提供了视野子午线如何通过各向异性注意梯度影响基于对象的注意力传播的细化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anisotropic object-based shifts of attention arise from unequal influences of visual field meridians on neural attention gradients.

Object-based attention prioritizes the processing of information appearing within a selected object. We previously showed an object-based shift direction anisotropy (SDA) whereby horizontal shifts are more efficient than vertical shifts (1, 2), an effect modulated by the visual field meridians (3). Our present aim was to understand how the functional brain mechanisms of attention give rise to the SDA. We hypothesized that the SDA arises from attentional resources being partitioned differently by horizontal and vertical meridians. To test this, we used fMRI of visual cortex while subjects shifted attention horizontally and vertically within a single, L-shaped object. An SDA was observed when targets crossed the visual field meridians, and the object vertex was positioned in the upper-left corner. However, no SDA was observed when the object vertex was positioned in the lower-right corner. Cue-related activations revealed that attention spreads throughout the vertical component of each object (even to locations where the target never appeared). Additionally, the vertical meridian seemed to impede the spread of attention for the upper-left object's horizontal component. However, for the lower-right object, the horizontal component showed a similar attentional modulation to its vertical component, commensurate with behavioral performance in response to that object. These results suggest the efficiency of horizontal shifts crossing the vertical meridian is enhanced by the support of attentional resources from both hemispheres. As such, we offer a refinement of how the visual field meridians may influence the spread of object-based attention via an anisotropic attention gradient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信