短暂奖励任务:为什么鸽子很难学会?

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Daniel Peng, Zohaib Iqbal, Thomas R Zentall
{"title":"短暂奖励任务:为什么鸽子很难学会?","authors":"Daniel Peng, Zohaib Iqbal, Thomas R Zentall","doi":"10.1037/xan0000397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the Ephemeral Reward Task, a subject is presented with a choice between two stimuli, A and B. If it chooses A, it gets a reward and the trial is over. If it chooses B, it gets a reward and it can then respond to A, to obtain a second reward. Wrasse (cleaner fish) and parrots learn to choose B optimally within 100 trials, primates may also learn, whereas pigeons and rats do not. We attempted to determine why pigeons have difficulty learning their task. First, we tested the hypothesis that pigeons fail because the outcome after choice of A is similar to the outcome after a response to A given choice of B. For group AC, after the choice of B, stimulus A changed to stimulus C. For group BC, after the choice of stimulus B, stimulus B changed to stimulus C. For group BB, after the choice of stimulus B, stimulus B remained for a second reward. None of the three groups learned to choose optimally. In Experiment 2, the probability of reward for choice of stimulus A or B was reduced to 50%. Pigeons learned to choose optimally. We suggest that the difference in value between one and two rewards may not be as great as the difference in value between 0.5 and one reward. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ephemeral reward task: Why is it so difficult for pigeons to learn it?\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Peng, Zohaib Iqbal, Thomas R Zentall\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xan0000397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the Ephemeral Reward Task, a subject is presented with a choice between two stimuli, A and B. If it chooses A, it gets a reward and the trial is over. If it chooses B, it gets a reward and it can then respond to A, to obtain a second reward. Wrasse (cleaner fish) and parrots learn to choose B optimally within 100 trials, primates may also learn, whereas pigeons and rats do not. We attempted to determine why pigeons have difficulty learning their task. First, we tested the hypothesis that pigeons fail because the outcome after choice of A is similar to the outcome after a response to A given choice of B. For group AC, after the choice of B, stimulus A changed to stimulus C. For group BC, after the choice of stimulus B, stimulus B changed to stimulus C. For group BB, after the choice of stimulus B, stimulus B remained for a second reward. None of the three groups learned to choose optimally. In Experiment 2, the probability of reward for choice of stimulus A or B was reduced to 50%. Pigeons learned to choose optimally. We suggest that the difference in value between one and two rewards may not be as great as the difference in value between 0.5 and one reward. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000397\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000397","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在短暂奖励任务(Ephemeral Reward Task)中,受试者被要求在a和b两种刺激中做出选择。如果受试者选择了a,就会得到奖励,实验结束。如果它选择B,它会得到奖励,然后它可以对a做出反应,获得第二个奖励。濑鱼(清洁鱼)和鹦鹉在100次试验中学会最佳选择B,灵长类动物也可能学会,而鸽子和老鼠则不会。我们试图确定为什么鸽子很难学习它们的任务。首先,我们检验了鸽子失败的假设,因为选择A后的结果与选择B后的结果相似。对于AC组,在选择B后,刺激A变成了刺激c。对于BC组,在选择B后,刺激B变成了刺激c。对于BB组,在选择B后,刺激B保留了第二个奖励。这三组人都没有学会如何做出最优选择。在实验2中,选择刺激A或B的奖励概率降低到50%。鸽子学会了最优选择。我们认为,1和2个奖励之间的价值差异可能不如0.5和1个奖励之间的价值差异那么大。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ephemeral reward task: Why is it so difficult for pigeons to learn it?

In the Ephemeral Reward Task, a subject is presented with a choice between two stimuli, A and B. If it chooses A, it gets a reward and the trial is over. If it chooses B, it gets a reward and it can then respond to A, to obtain a second reward. Wrasse (cleaner fish) and parrots learn to choose B optimally within 100 trials, primates may also learn, whereas pigeons and rats do not. We attempted to determine why pigeons have difficulty learning their task. First, we tested the hypothesis that pigeons fail because the outcome after choice of A is similar to the outcome after a response to A given choice of B. For group AC, after the choice of B, stimulus A changed to stimulus C. For group BC, after the choice of stimulus B, stimulus B changed to stimulus C. For group BB, after the choice of stimulus B, stimulus B remained for a second reward. None of the three groups learned to choose optimally. In Experiment 2, the probability of reward for choice of stimulus A or B was reduced to 50%. Pigeons learned to choose optimally. We suggest that the difference in value between one and two rewards may not be as great as the difference in value between 0.5 and one reward. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition Psychology-Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition publishes experimental and theoretical studies concerning all aspects of animal behavior processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信