反应性喂养治疗儿童喂养障碍（PFD）：一个范围综述

IF 4.6 2区医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Appetite Pub Date : 2025-06-27 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2025.108211

Melissa R. Mattner, Alma Luis Guzman, Elizabeth Moore, Jennifer Fortuna, Laureen Cantwell-Jurkovic

{"title":"反应性喂养治疗儿童喂养障碍（PFD）：一个范围综述","authors":"Melissa R. Mattner, Alma Luis Guzman, Elizabeth Moore, Jennifer Fortuna, Laureen Cantwell-Jurkovic","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study summarizes existing research on responsive feeding interventions for pediatric feeding disorder (PFD). This study also identifies gaps in the literature to inform future research.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The five stages of a scoping review methodologicsal framework were used to guide this study. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were conducted by hand. Descriptive statistics included simple frequency counts and percentages (mean average) of all values. Content analysis was completed based on guidance from the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. This research followed reporting guidelines from the PRISMA-ScR checklist to improve transparency throughout the scoping review process.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Common themes include use of environmental supports, providing education to strengthen caregiver and child relationships, and lack of guidelines for intervention. Gaps in the literature include intervention effectiveness, lack of guidance for feeding specialists, and rationale for selecting and applying research evidence in practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Specialists from a variety of disciplines utilize responsive feeding principles. An overarching framework for treating PFD is needed that includes caregiver coaching as a foundation for high-quality feeding interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 108211"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsive feeding therapy for children with pediatric feeding disorder (PFD): A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Melissa R. Mattner, Alma Luis Guzman, Elizabeth Moore, Jennifer Fortuna, Laureen Cantwell-Jurkovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study summarizes existing research on responsive feeding interventions for pediatric feeding disorder (PFD). This study also identifies gaps in the literature to inform future research.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The five stages of a scoping review methodologicsal framework were used to guide this study. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were conducted by hand. Descriptive statistics included simple frequency counts and percentages (mean average) of all values. Content analysis was completed based on guidance from the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. This research followed reporting guidelines from the PRISMA-ScR checklist to improve transparency throughout the scoping review process.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Common themes include use of environmental supports, providing education to strengthen caregiver and child relationships, and lack of guidelines for intervention. Gaps in the literature include intervention effectiveness, lack of guidance for feeding specialists, and rationale for selecting and applying research evidence in practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Specialists from a variety of disciplines utilize responsive feeding principles. An overarching framework for treating PFD is needed that includes caregiver coaching as a foundation for high-quality feeding interventions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325003642\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325003642","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的总结反应性喂养干预治疗小儿喂养障碍（PFD）的研究现状。本研究还确定了文献中的空白，为未来的研究提供信息。方法采用五个阶段的范围综述方法学框架来指导本研究。手工进行描述性统计和定性内容分析。描述性统计包括简单的频率计数和所有值的百分比（平均）。内容分析是根据JBI证据综合手册的指导完成的。本研究遵循PRISMA-ScR检查表的报告指南，以提高整个范围审查过程的透明度。结果常见的主题包括使用环境支持，提供教育以加强照顾者和儿童的关系，以及缺乏干预指南。文献中的空白包括干预的有效性，缺乏对喂养专家的指导，以及在实践中选择和应用研究证据的理由。结论：不同学科的专家采用反应性喂养原则。需要一个治疗PFD的总体框架，其中包括护理人员指导，作为高质量喂养干预的基础。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Responsive feeding therapy for children with pediatric feeding disorder (PFD): A scoping review

Objectives

This study summarizes existing research on responsive feeding interventions for pediatric feeding disorder (PFD). This study also identifies gaps in the literature to inform future research.

Method

The five stages of a scoping review methodologicsal framework were used to guide this study. Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were conducted by hand. Descriptive statistics included simple frequency counts and percentages (mean average) of all values. Content analysis was completed based on guidance from the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. This research followed reporting guidelines from the PRISMA-ScR checklist to improve transparency throughout the scoping review process.

Results

Common themes include use of environmental supports, providing education to strengthen caregiver and child relationships, and lack of guidelines for intervention. Gaps in the literature include intervention effectiveness, lack of guidance for feeding specialists, and rationale for selecting and applying research evidence in practice.

Conclusions

Specialists from a variety of disciplines utilize responsive feeding principles. An overarching framework for treating PFD is needed that includes caregiver coaching as a foundation for high-quality feeding interventions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Appetite 医学-行为科学

CiteScore

9.10

自引率

11.10%

发文量

566

审稿时长

13.4 weeks

期刊介绍： Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.