“不后悔,它们没有用”:利用修复策略来接受个人职业生涯中的困难

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Claire Schulze Schleithoff, Evgenia I. Lysova, Svetlana N. Khapova, Konstantin Korotov
{"title":"“不后悔,它们没有用”:利用修复策略来接受个人职业生涯中的困难","authors":"Claire Schulze Schleithoff,&nbsp;Evgenia I. Lysova,&nbsp;Svetlana N. Khapova,&nbsp;Konstantin Korotov","doi":"10.1111/joop.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As scholarly interest in the impact of career difficulties like career setbacks grows, research increasingly aims to understand how individuals navigate these difficulties. To explore how individuals handle them and prevent career regret, we conducted a qualitative investigation with a total sample of 109 participants. Our findings reveal that many individuals embraced difficulties in their careers instead of regretting them. We saw that the difference between regretting and embracing these difficulties lies in whether individuals employ repair strategies: embracing difficulties was possible through repair, whereas failing to engage in repair led them to feel a sense of regret about the difficulty. We identified three repair strategies—<i>reclaiming</i> (i.e., realigning career with personal values or restoring measurable, tangible conditions), <i>enriching</i> (i.e., adding new knowledge or extending career towards greater fulfilment), and <i>mobilizing</i> (i.e., disrupting the career, or transitioning into a more promising career)—which enable individuals to embrace difficulties. Additionally, our findings revealed that two triggering factors foster engagement with repair, namely, <i>adopting a protean career attitude</i> and <i>exercising courage</i>. Taken together, our findings promote the importance of repair strategies as a crucial response that can alter how people perceive difficulties in their careers and avoid emotions of regret.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.70033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘No regrets, they don't work’: Utilizing repair strategies to embrace difficulties in individuals' careers\",\"authors\":\"Claire Schulze Schleithoff,&nbsp;Evgenia I. Lysova,&nbsp;Svetlana N. Khapova,&nbsp;Konstantin Korotov\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joop.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As scholarly interest in the impact of career difficulties like career setbacks grows, research increasingly aims to understand how individuals navigate these difficulties. To explore how individuals handle them and prevent career regret, we conducted a qualitative investigation with a total sample of 109 participants. Our findings reveal that many individuals embraced difficulties in their careers instead of regretting them. We saw that the difference between regretting and embracing these difficulties lies in whether individuals employ repair strategies: embracing difficulties was possible through repair, whereas failing to engage in repair led them to feel a sense of regret about the difficulty. We identified three repair strategies—<i>reclaiming</i> (i.e., realigning career with personal values or restoring measurable, tangible conditions), <i>enriching</i> (i.e., adding new knowledge or extending career towards greater fulfilment), and <i>mobilizing</i> (i.e., disrupting the career, or transitioning into a more promising career)—which enable individuals to embrace difficulties. Additionally, our findings revealed that two triggering factors foster engagement with repair, namely, <i>adopting a protean career attitude</i> and <i>exercising courage</i>. Taken together, our findings promote the importance of repair strategies as a crucial response that can alter how people perceive difficulties in their careers and avoid emotions of regret.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"98 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.70033\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.70033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.70033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着学术界对职业挫折等职业困难影响的兴趣日益浓厚,研究的目的越来越多地是了解个人如何应对这些困难。为了探讨个人如何处理和预防职业后悔,我们对109名参与者进行了定性调查。我们的研究结果表明,许多人接受了职业生涯中的困难,而不是后悔。我们发现,后悔和拥抱这些困难的区别在于个体是否采用了修复策略:通过修复拥抱困难是可能的,而不进行修复则会让他们对困难感到后悔。我们确定了三种修复策略——回收(即,重新调整职业与个人价值观或恢复可测量的、有形的条件),丰富(即,增加新知识或将职业扩展到更大的成就)和动员(即,破坏职业,或过渡到更有前途的职业)——这使个人能够接受困难。此外,我们的研究结果还揭示了两个触发因素,即采取多变的职业态度和锻炼勇气,促进了修复的参与。综上所述,我们的研究结果促进了修复策略作为一种关键反应的重要性,它可以改变人们对职业生涯中困难的看法,避免后悔的情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

‘No regrets, they don't work’: Utilizing repair strategies to embrace difficulties in individuals' careers

‘No regrets, they don't work’: Utilizing repair strategies to embrace difficulties in individuals' careers

As scholarly interest in the impact of career difficulties like career setbacks grows, research increasingly aims to understand how individuals navigate these difficulties. To explore how individuals handle them and prevent career regret, we conducted a qualitative investigation with a total sample of 109 participants. Our findings reveal that many individuals embraced difficulties in their careers instead of regretting them. We saw that the difference between regretting and embracing these difficulties lies in whether individuals employ repair strategies: embracing difficulties was possible through repair, whereas failing to engage in repair led them to feel a sense of regret about the difficulty. We identified three repair strategies—reclaiming (i.e., realigning career with personal values or restoring measurable, tangible conditions), enriching (i.e., adding new knowledge or extending career towards greater fulfilment), and mobilizing (i.e., disrupting the career, or transitioning into a more promising career)—which enable individuals to embrace difficulties. Additionally, our findings revealed that two triggering factors foster engagement with repair, namely, adopting a protean career attitude and exercising courage. Taken together, our findings promote the importance of repair strategies as a crucial response that can alter how people perceive difficulties in their careers and avoid emotions of regret.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信