制裁对公司报告行为的影响:国际证据

IF 2.8 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Mohammad Abweny, Rizwan Ahmed, Chonlakan Benjasak, Dung T. K. Nguyen
{"title":"制裁对公司报告行为的影响:国际证据","authors":"Mohammad Abweny,&nbsp;Rizwan Ahmed,&nbsp;Chonlakan Benjasak,&nbsp;Dung T. K. Nguyen","doi":"10.1002/ijfe.3064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study investigates the impact of sanctions on corporate reporting behaviour, encompassing both financial and sustainability reporting. Utilising comprehensive data from the Global Sanctions Database (GSDB), the study reveals an asymmetrical effect of sanctions on corporate reporting behaviours. Specifically, our findings reveal a negative relationship between sanctions and earnings management, suggesting a more conservative and transparent approach to financial reporting during sanction periods. However, the relationship between sanctions and the quality of sustainability reporting is significantly negative, indicating a decline in sustainability reporting quality during times of sanctions. Furthermore, the study provides evidence that EU sanctions have a stronger influence on both types of reporting compared to US sanctions. The results also break down the effects of each type of sanction on corporate reporting, indicating that financial and trade sanctions have a significant impact, while military and other types of sanctions do not show a significant effect. Drawing from signalling theory, corporate reports serve to signal stakeholders about a firm's behaviour and alleviate the information asymmetry between managers and other stakeholders. Consequently, our study contributes to signalling theory by illustrating that distinct signals are conveyed through different reports during uncertain periods, such as sanctions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47461,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Finance & Economics","volume":"30 3","pages":"3322-3339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Sanctions on Corporate Reporting Behaviour: International Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Abweny,&nbsp;Rizwan Ahmed,&nbsp;Chonlakan Benjasak,&nbsp;Dung T. K. Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijfe.3064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This study investigates the impact of sanctions on corporate reporting behaviour, encompassing both financial and sustainability reporting. Utilising comprehensive data from the Global Sanctions Database (GSDB), the study reveals an asymmetrical effect of sanctions on corporate reporting behaviours. Specifically, our findings reveal a negative relationship between sanctions and earnings management, suggesting a more conservative and transparent approach to financial reporting during sanction periods. However, the relationship between sanctions and the quality of sustainability reporting is significantly negative, indicating a decline in sustainability reporting quality during times of sanctions. Furthermore, the study provides evidence that EU sanctions have a stronger influence on both types of reporting compared to US sanctions. The results also break down the effects of each type of sanction on corporate reporting, indicating that financial and trade sanctions have a significant impact, while military and other types of sanctions do not show a significant effect. Drawing from signalling theory, corporate reports serve to signal stakeholders about a firm's behaviour and alleviate the information asymmetry between managers and other stakeholders. Consequently, our study contributes to signalling theory by illustrating that distinct signals are conveyed through different reports during uncertain periods, such as sanctions.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Finance & Economics\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"3322-3339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Finance & Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijfe.3064\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Finance & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijfe.3064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了制裁对公司报告行为的影响,包括财务报告和可持续发展报告。该研究利用全球制裁数据库(GSDB)的综合数据,揭示了制裁对企业报告行为的不对称影响。具体而言,我们的研究结果揭示了制裁与盈余管理之间的负相关关系,建议在制裁期间采用更保守和透明的财务报告方法。然而,制裁与可持续发展报告质量之间的关系明显为负,表明制裁期间可持续发展报告质量下降。此外,该研究提供的证据表明,与美国的制裁相比,欧盟的制裁对这两种类型的报道都有更大的影响。结果还分解了每种制裁对公司报告的影响,表明金融和贸易制裁有显著影响,而军事和其他类型的制裁没有显示出显著影响。根据信号理论,公司报告可以向利益相关者发出有关公司行为的信号,并缓解管理者和其他利益相关者之间的信息不对称。因此,我们的研究有助于信号理论,说明在不确定时期,如制裁,不同的信号通过不同的报告传达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Influence of Sanctions on Corporate Reporting Behaviour: International Evidence

This study investigates the impact of sanctions on corporate reporting behaviour, encompassing both financial and sustainability reporting. Utilising comprehensive data from the Global Sanctions Database (GSDB), the study reveals an asymmetrical effect of sanctions on corporate reporting behaviours. Specifically, our findings reveal a negative relationship between sanctions and earnings management, suggesting a more conservative and transparent approach to financial reporting during sanction periods. However, the relationship between sanctions and the quality of sustainability reporting is significantly negative, indicating a decline in sustainability reporting quality during times of sanctions. Furthermore, the study provides evidence that EU sanctions have a stronger influence on both types of reporting compared to US sanctions. The results also break down the effects of each type of sanction on corporate reporting, indicating that financial and trade sanctions have a significant impact, while military and other types of sanctions do not show a significant effect. Drawing from signalling theory, corporate reports serve to signal stakeholders about a firm's behaviour and alleviate the information asymmetry between managers and other stakeholders. Consequently, our study contributes to signalling theory by illustrating that distinct signals are conveyed through different reports during uncertain periods, such as sanctions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
143
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信