{"title":"全双列杂交对4个鸡品种产蛋性状的遗传分析","authors":"Philimon Teshome , Gebeyehu Goshu , Wondmeneh Esatu , Tadelle Dessie","doi":"10.1016/j.psj.2025.105459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the present study, effects of crossbreeding on egg production traits were evaluated using a 4 × 4 full diallel cross involving four chicken breeds: Improved Horro (<strong>H</strong>), Sasso (<strong>S</strong>), Potchefstroom Koekoek (<strong>K</strong>), and Dz-white feathered (<strong>D</strong>). The experiment included 800 chickens in a completely randomized design. Data on egg production traits were collected over 40 weeks (<strong>WK</strong>). Genotypes exhibited significant variations (<em>P</em> < 0.0001) in age at first egg (<strong>AFE</strong>), body weight at sexual maturity (<strong>BWSM</strong>), egg weight at first egg (<strong>EWAFE</strong>), egg number (<strong>EN</strong>), hen-housed egg production <strong>(HHEP</strong>), hen-day egg production (<strong>HDEP</strong>), and egg mass (<strong>EM</strong>). Heterosis effects (<strong>H<sup>e</sup></strong>) varied widely, with positive H<sup>e</sup> for BWSM and EM in most crosses, while AFE consistently showed negative H<sup>e</sup>. All reciprocal crosses showed positive H<sup>e</sup> for EWAFE, while direct crosses had negative values except <em>H</em> × <em>S</em> and <em>H</em> × <em>D</em>. The <em>K</em> × <em>H</em> cross showed the highest H<sup>e</sup> for HHEP (26.85 %), HDEP (29.44 %), EM (40.88 %), and EN (28.27 %). The cross <em>D</em> × <em>H</em> also exhibited strong H<sup>e</sup> for HHEP (25.16 %) and EN (24.60 %), while <em>K</em> × <em>S</em> ranked second for HDEP (22.60 %) and EM (33.89 %). Reciprocal crosses showed positive H<sup>e</sup> for BWSM, EWAFE, HHEP, HDEP, EM, and EN, except AFE. General combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) effects were highly significant (<em>P</em> < 0.0001) for all traits. Reciprocal effects (<strong>RE</strong>) and maternal effects (<strong>M<sup>e</sup></strong>) also influenced trait expression. GCA/SCA ratios indicated that non-additive effects influenced AFE, while additive effects influenced EWAFE. Moderate ratios for HHEP, HDEP, EM, and EN suggested a balance between additive and non-additive effects. Optimizing crossbreeding strategies, aligning with synthetic breed development, using a K sire with H and S dams, and a D sire with H dam, is recommended to improve egg production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20459,"journal":{"name":"Poultry Science","volume":"104 9","pages":"Article 105459"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic analysis of egg production traits in four chicken breeds using a full diallel cross\",\"authors\":\"Philimon Teshome , Gebeyehu Goshu , Wondmeneh Esatu , Tadelle Dessie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psj.2025.105459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the present study, effects of crossbreeding on egg production traits were evaluated using a 4 × 4 full diallel cross involving four chicken breeds: Improved Horro (<strong>H</strong>), Sasso (<strong>S</strong>), Potchefstroom Koekoek (<strong>K</strong>), and Dz-white feathered (<strong>D</strong>). The experiment included 800 chickens in a completely randomized design. Data on egg production traits were collected over 40 weeks (<strong>WK</strong>). Genotypes exhibited significant variations (<em>P</em> < 0.0001) in age at first egg (<strong>AFE</strong>), body weight at sexual maturity (<strong>BWSM</strong>), egg weight at first egg (<strong>EWAFE</strong>), egg number (<strong>EN</strong>), hen-housed egg production <strong>(HHEP</strong>), hen-day egg production (<strong>HDEP</strong>), and egg mass (<strong>EM</strong>). Heterosis effects (<strong>H<sup>e</sup></strong>) varied widely, with positive H<sup>e</sup> for BWSM and EM in most crosses, while AFE consistently showed negative H<sup>e</sup>. All reciprocal crosses showed positive H<sup>e</sup> for EWAFE, while direct crosses had negative values except <em>H</em> × <em>S</em> and <em>H</em> × <em>D</em>. The <em>K</em> × <em>H</em> cross showed the highest H<sup>e</sup> for HHEP (26.85 %), HDEP (29.44 %), EM (40.88 %), and EN (28.27 %). The cross <em>D</em> × <em>H</em> also exhibited strong H<sup>e</sup> for HHEP (25.16 %) and EN (24.60 %), while <em>K</em> × <em>S</em> ranked second for HDEP (22.60 %) and EM (33.89 %). Reciprocal crosses showed positive H<sup>e</sup> for BWSM, EWAFE, HHEP, HDEP, EM, and EN, except AFE. General combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) effects were highly significant (<em>P</em> < 0.0001) for all traits. Reciprocal effects (<strong>RE</strong>) and maternal effects (<strong>M<sup>e</sup></strong>) also influenced trait expression. GCA/SCA ratios indicated that non-additive effects influenced AFE, while additive effects influenced EWAFE. Moderate ratios for HHEP, HDEP, EM, and EN suggested a balance between additive and non-additive effects. Optimizing crossbreeding strategies, aligning with synthetic breed development, using a K sire with H and S dams, and a D sire with H dam, is recommended to improve egg production.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poultry Science\",\"volume\":\"104 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 105459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poultry Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579125007035\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579125007035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genetic analysis of egg production traits in four chicken breeds using a full diallel cross
In the present study, effects of crossbreeding on egg production traits were evaluated using a 4 × 4 full diallel cross involving four chicken breeds: Improved Horro (H), Sasso (S), Potchefstroom Koekoek (K), and Dz-white feathered (D). The experiment included 800 chickens in a completely randomized design. Data on egg production traits were collected over 40 weeks (WK). Genotypes exhibited significant variations (P < 0.0001) in age at first egg (AFE), body weight at sexual maturity (BWSM), egg weight at first egg (EWAFE), egg number (EN), hen-housed egg production (HHEP), hen-day egg production (HDEP), and egg mass (EM). Heterosis effects (He) varied widely, with positive He for BWSM and EM in most crosses, while AFE consistently showed negative He. All reciprocal crosses showed positive He for EWAFE, while direct crosses had negative values except H × S and H × D. The K × H cross showed the highest He for HHEP (26.85 %), HDEP (29.44 %), EM (40.88 %), and EN (28.27 %). The cross D × H also exhibited strong He for HHEP (25.16 %) and EN (24.60 %), while K × S ranked second for HDEP (22.60 %) and EM (33.89 %). Reciprocal crosses showed positive He for BWSM, EWAFE, HHEP, HDEP, EM, and EN, except AFE. General combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) effects were highly significant (P < 0.0001) for all traits. Reciprocal effects (RE) and maternal effects (Me) also influenced trait expression. GCA/SCA ratios indicated that non-additive effects influenced AFE, while additive effects influenced EWAFE. Moderate ratios for HHEP, HDEP, EM, and EN suggested a balance between additive and non-additive effects. Optimizing crossbreeding strategies, aligning with synthetic breed development, using a K sire with H and S dams, and a D sire with H dam, is recommended to improve egg production.
期刊介绍:
First self-published in 1921, Poultry Science is an internationally renowned monthly journal, known as the authoritative source for a broad range of poultry information and high-caliber research. The journal plays a pivotal role in the dissemination of preeminent poultry-related knowledge across all disciplines. As of January 2020, Poultry Science will become an Open Access journal with no subscription charges, meaning authors who publish here can make their research immediately, permanently, and freely accessible worldwide while retaining copyright to their work. Papers submitted for publication after October 1, 2019 will be published as Open Access papers.
An international journal, Poultry Science publishes original papers, research notes, symposium papers, and reviews of basic science as applied to poultry. This authoritative source of poultry information is consistently ranked by ISI Impact Factor as one of the top 10 agriculture, dairy and animal science journals to deliver high-caliber research. Currently it is the highest-ranked (by Impact Factor and Eigenfactor) journal dedicated to publishing poultry research. Subject areas include breeding, genetics, education, production, management, environment, health, behavior, welfare, immunology, molecular biology, metabolism, nutrition, physiology, reproduction, processing, and products.