精神科医生和患者对精神分裂症相关认知障碍的认识和管理:一项横断面调查的结果

IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Tomiki Sumiyoshi , Satoru Ikezawa , Kaori Inaba , Tatsuro Marumoto , Ichiro Kusumi , Kazuyuki Nakagome
{"title":"精神科医生和患者对精神分裂症相关认知障碍的认识和管理:一项横断面调查的结果","authors":"Tomiki Sumiyoshi ,&nbsp;Satoru Ikezawa ,&nbsp;Kaori Inaba ,&nbsp;Tatsuro Marumoto ,&nbsp;Ichiro Kusumi ,&nbsp;Kazuyuki Nakagome","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluated awareness, management, and the burden of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) in Japan. A non-interventional, cross-sectional study was conducted online between April and December 2023, involving 149 psychiatrists and 852 patients. Psychiatrists prioritized controlling positive symptoms in the acute phase of the illness, while improving social functioning was the top priority for the maintenance/stable phase. Management of CIAS was regarded as most important for the reintegration of patients into society. Psychiatrists reported higher occurrence of CIAS among inpatients than outpatients. While 72 % of psychiatrists assessed CIAS, only 15 % used the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia. Further, 58 % of them reported that ≤40 % of their patients received interventions for CIAS. Sixty-eight percent of patients reported current or previous experiences of CIAS. The most common CIAS-related burdens were “unable to perform tasks I could do before or they take longer” (65 %) and “unable to maintain concentration” (64 %). In patients not currently experiencing CIAS (<em>n</em> = 496), these burdens were reported by 52 % and 50 %, respectively. Although CIAS was generally recognized by psychiatrists, the use of appropriate assessment tools and interventions was not common. While many patients reported CIAS-related burdens, a substantial proportion of them were unaware of CIAS. These observations indicate that the greater awareness of CIAS may facilitate its management in clinical practice, thus enhancing the ability of patients to reintegrate into society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100375"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Awareness and management of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia in psychiatrists and patients: Results from a cross-sectional survey\",\"authors\":\"Tomiki Sumiyoshi ,&nbsp;Satoru Ikezawa ,&nbsp;Kaori Inaba ,&nbsp;Tatsuro Marumoto ,&nbsp;Ichiro Kusumi ,&nbsp;Kazuyuki Nakagome\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study evaluated awareness, management, and the burden of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) in Japan. A non-interventional, cross-sectional study was conducted online between April and December 2023, involving 149 psychiatrists and 852 patients. Psychiatrists prioritized controlling positive symptoms in the acute phase of the illness, while improving social functioning was the top priority for the maintenance/stable phase. Management of CIAS was regarded as most important for the reintegration of patients into society. Psychiatrists reported higher occurrence of CIAS among inpatients than outpatients. While 72 % of psychiatrists assessed CIAS, only 15 % used the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia. Further, 58 % of them reported that ≤40 % of their patients received interventions for CIAS. Sixty-eight percent of patients reported current or previous experiences of CIAS. The most common CIAS-related burdens were “unable to perform tasks I could do before or they take longer” (65 %) and “unable to maintain concentration” (64 %). In patients not currently experiencing CIAS (<em>n</em> = 496), these burdens were reported by 52 % and 50 %, respectively. Although CIAS was generally recognized by psychiatrists, the use of appropriate assessment tools and interventions was not common. While many patients reported CIAS-related burdens, a substantial proportion of them were unaware of CIAS. These observations indicate that the greater awareness of CIAS may facilitate its management in clinical practice, thus enhancing the ability of patients to reintegrate into society.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001325000332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001325000332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了日本精神分裂症相关认知障碍(CIAS)的意识、管理和负担。一项非介入性的横断面研究于2023年4月至12月在线进行,涉及149名精神科医生和852名患者。精神科医生在疾病的急性期优先考虑控制阳性症状,而在维持/稳定期优先考虑改善社会功能。CIAS的管理被认为是患者重新融入社会的最重要的。精神科医生报告住院患者的CIAS发生率高于门诊患者。虽然72%的精神科医生评估了CIAS,但只有15%的人使用了精神分裂症认知简要评估。此外,58%的医生报告说,≤40%的患者接受了CIAS干预。68%的患者报告了目前或以前的CIAS经历。最常见的与cias相关的负担是“无法完成以前可以完成的任务或需要更长的时间”(65%)和“无法保持注意力集中”(64%)。在目前未经历CIAS的患者中(n = 496),分别有52%和50%的患者报告了这些负担。虽然精神科医生普遍认可CIAS,但使用适当的评估工具和干预措施并不常见。虽然许多患者报告了与CIAS相关的负担,但其中很大一部分人并不知道CIAS。这些观察结果表明,提高对CIAS的认识可能有助于临床实践中对其进行管理,从而提高患者重新融入社会的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Awareness and management of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia in psychiatrists and patients: Results from a cross-sectional survey
This study evaluated awareness, management, and the burden of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) in Japan. A non-interventional, cross-sectional study was conducted online between April and December 2023, involving 149 psychiatrists and 852 patients. Psychiatrists prioritized controlling positive symptoms in the acute phase of the illness, while improving social functioning was the top priority for the maintenance/stable phase. Management of CIAS was regarded as most important for the reintegration of patients into society. Psychiatrists reported higher occurrence of CIAS among inpatients than outpatients. While 72 % of psychiatrists assessed CIAS, only 15 % used the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia. Further, 58 % of them reported that ≤40 % of their patients received interventions for CIAS. Sixty-eight percent of patients reported current or previous experiences of CIAS. The most common CIAS-related burdens were “unable to perform tasks I could do before or they take longer” (65 %) and “unable to maintain concentration” (64 %). In patients not currently experiencing CIAS (n = 496), these burdens were reported by 52 % and 50 %, respectively. Although CIAS was generally recognized by psychiatrists, the use of appropriate assessment tools and interventions was not common. While many patients reported CIAS-related burdens, a substantial proportion of them were unaware of CIAS. These observations indicate that the greater awareness of CIAS may facilitate its management in clinical practice, thus enhancing the ability of patients to reintegrate into society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信