{"title":"一种基于力量的方法来探索学龄前儿童的空间语言和模式技能","authors":"Danielle Harris, Ilyse Resnick, Tom Lowrie","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Deficits in spatial language and patterning skills are disproportionately represented amongst marginalized groups. However, ‘deficit models’ do not consider children's enactment of skills within contexts other than traditional test-based assessment. It is possible that assessment context (e.g., test-based versus game-based) influences the manifestation of these skills.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To compare the spatial language and patterning skills of children in game-based and test-based assessment contexts drawn from different geographic locations and levels of socio-economic advantage (SEA).</div></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><div>Preschool children (Mean age = 4 years, 11 months, S.D. = 6 months) from Metropolitan Cities, Regional Cities, and Rural Areas (<em>N</em> = 402 for spatial language, <em>N =</em> 439 for patterning).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Performance was compared on digital measures of spatial language and spatial patterning through game-based and test-based assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant main effects were found for performance on language and patterning test-based assessments for Geography and SEA, as well as significant interactions. Children from rural areas outperformed children from metropolitan and regional cities, and children from High SEA communities outperformed children from Low SEA communities on these measures. The effects of SEA on test-based assessment were most pronounced in city samples. There were no significant effects for SEA or Geography on game-based assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results highlight the impact of assessment context on measurement of spatial language and patterning skills for marginalized students. Current measures may not entirely capture children's capabilities. Furthermore, the superior spatial skills found amongst children from rural communities could be capitalized upon to support performance in traditional education settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 102180"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A strength-based approach to exploring pre-school children’s spatial language and patterning skills\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Harris, Ilyse Resnick, Tom Lowrie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Deficits in spatial language and patterning skills are disproportionately represented amongst marginalized groups. However, ‘deficit models’ do not consider children's enactment of skills within contexts other than traditional test-based assessment. It is possible that assessment context (e.g., test-based versus game-based) influences the manifestation of these skills.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To compare the spatial language and patterning skills of children in game-based and test-based assessment contexts drawn from different geographic locations and levels of socio-economic advantage (SEA).</div></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><div>Preschool children (Mean age = 4 years, 11 months, S.D. = 6 months) from Metropolitan Cities, Regional Cities, and Rural Areas (<em>N</em> = 402 for spatial language, <em>N =</em> 439 for patterning).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Performance was compared on digital measures of spatial language and spatial patterning through game-based and test-based assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant main effects were found for performance on language and patterning test-based assessments for Geography and SEA, as well as significant interactions. Children from rural areas outperformed children from metropolitan and regional cities, and children from High SEA communities outperformed children from Low SEA communities on these measures. The effects of SEA on test-based assessment were most pronounced in city samples. There were no significant effects for SEA or Geography on game-based assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results highlight the impact of assessment context on measurement of spatial language and patterning skills for marginalized students. Current measures may not entirely capture children's capabilities. Furthermore, the superior spatial skills found amongst children from rural communities could be capitalized upon to support performance in traditional education settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225001045\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225001045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A strength-based approach to exploring pre-school children’s spatial language and patterning skills
Background
Deficits in spatial language and patterning skills are disproportionately represented amongst marginalized groups. However, ‘deficit models’ do not consider children's enactment of skills within contexts other than traditional test-based assessment. It is possible that assessment context (e.g., test-based versus game-based) influences the manifestation of these skills.
Aims
To compare the spatial language and patterning skills of children in game-based and test-based assessment contexts drawn from different geographic locations and levels of socio-economic advantage (SEA).
Sample
Preschool children (Mean age = 4 years, 11 months, S.D. = 6 months) from Metropolitan Cities, Regional Cities, and Rural Areas (N = 402 for spatial language, N = 439 for patterning).
Methods
Performance was compared on digital measures of spatial language and spatial patterning through game-based and test-based assessment.
Results
Significant main effects were found for performance on language and patterning test-based assessments for Geography and SEA, as well as significant interactions. Children from rural areas outperformed children from metropolitan and regional cities, and children from High SEA communities outperformed children from Low SEA communities on these measures. The effects of SEA on test-based assessment were most pronounced in city samples. There were no significant effects for SEA or Geography on game-based assessment.
Conclusions
The results highlight the impact of assessment context on measurement of spatial language and patterning skills for marginalized students. Current measures may not entirely capture children's capabilities. Furthermore, the superior spatial skills found amongst children from rural communities could be capitalized upon to support performance in traditional education settings.
期刊介绍:
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.